| May 1, 2008 Biofuels: the Good, the Bad and the Unusual
 by Ralph Sims, International Energy Agency
 
 Within recent months biofuels have gone from making headline news as being 
    the world's salvation for when the oil runs out to becoming a "crime against 
    humanity." Almost every day the world's media run a story on the topic, 
    often blaming biofuels for all the world's pending disasters. Even a recent 
    spike in the price of rice was blamed on producing more biofuels whereas, in 
    fact, rice is not used as a feedstock at all!
 
 There are legitimate concerns about the sustainability of some biofuel 
    sources and they have taken a lot of criticism. But it is important to put 
    this in perspective, since, as is often the case, the truth probably lies 
    somewhere in between the extreme viewpoints. If only the oil market was 
    scrutinized to the same degree!
 
 There is no doubt there are "bad" biofuels that result in the world being 
    worse off as a result of their production. But there are also "good" 
    biofuels that can be produced in a sustainable manner, support local 
    development without exploitation, and result in a reduction of overall 
    environmental impacts including greenhouse gas emission reductions.
 
 Concerns at the amount of misinformation appearing in the media being picked 
    up by policy-makers, coupled with a vision that biofuels produced in 
    developing countries (the South) could in fact provide considerable local 
    benefits relating to sustainable development, as well possibly providing 
    export potential to developed countries (the North), led Professor John 
    Mathews of Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia to take action.
 
 He solicited 17 people with key interests in biofuels from a wide range of 
    international, national, industrial and academic organizations to meet 
    together to discuss the topic in depth and to agree, by consensus, on a 
    brief document. This document could then be used internationally by policy 
    makers, environmental groups, project developers, energy companies and 
    investors to obtain a balanced view of the issues, the relevant problems and 
    the potential benefits from using both first and second generation biofuels.
 
 He persuaded the Rockefeller Foundation to support the activity by 
    sponsoring the meeting, which was then held over a 5-day period in their 
    Conference Centre in Bellagio, Italy.
 
 His next step was somewhat less impressive in that, on the way to Bellagio, 
    he very unfortunately became indisposed and was unable to attend the meeting 
    at all. But thankfully he has now bounced back to full health and is 
    actively pursuing the cause once again - backed up by the Sustainable 
    Biofuels Consensus document completed in his absence.
 
 The Issues
 
 It is true that the increased production of biofuels has distorted some 
    commodity prices and therefore contributed to recent price increases in 
    grains and vegetable oils. However other factors, such as recent droughts, 
    low food stocks and surging demand for meat and milk products in Asia, have 
    probably played a far greater role. The higher world energy prices have also 
    pushed up the costs of food-crop production (including fertilizers), 
    processing and distribution. But in the media, biofuels tend to take the 
    full brunt of the criticism for all of these woes.
 
 Biofuels presently account for less than 2% of liquid transport fuels and 
    take up well below 1% of world agricultural land. This may seem like a small 
    share, but at over 1 million barrels of oil per day equivalent, they have 
    contributed to meet around 30% of the growth in global demand in liquid 
    transport fuels over the past three years and thus made a significant 
    contribution to the balance of the oil market.
 
 It is easy for politicians to over-promote biofuels, given that their 
    constituencies like the concept of simply substituting petroleum products 
    with another type of liquid fuel without having to buy a smaller car or 
    change their driving habits. However the high national costs of various 
    agricultural subsidies necessary to support biofuels in the North, have 
    largely been ignored in the debate. Also for some biofuels, greenhouse gas 
    emission reduction is not always as good as was commonly thought, when 
    demonstrated using complete life cycle analyses. Land use change and 
    deforestation, additional water use, genetic modification, increased 
    fertiliser and chemical inputs, all raise questions as to the longer term 
    sustainability of energy crop production. Interestingly, the same arguments 
    are rarely equally used for increased food production, as exemplified by 
    only around 10% of palm oil being used for biodiesel and the rest for 
    cooking oil.
 
 Potential Solutions
 
 In some tropical/sub-tropical regions of the South where arable land for 
    sugarcane production is available (from improved land management rather than 
    from deforestation), local development opportunities should not be 
    discounted. If biofuels can be produced in a sustainable way, and be 
    certified as such according to an agreed international standard currently 
    being debated, then they can offer valuable economic opportunities, 
    particularly to developing countries. Trade, equity, sustainable development 
    and energy security are all related issues.
 
 In the longer term second generation biofuels from ligno-cellulosic, 
    non-food feedstocks (straw, woody biomass residues, vegetative grasses) hold 
    promise and should address most of the current concerns but they remain 
    relatively costly options, even after 35+ years of RD&D. Several 
    demonstration projects are under way and major deployment of commercially 
    viable second generation biofuels may be just a few years off.
 
 The aim should be to progressively phase out subsidy systems for the less 
    sustainable biofuels and focus on incentives to bring forward second 
    generation production of both ethanol and synthetic diesel as well perhaps a 
    "third generation" from algae and using advanced bio-technoloiges. Recent 
    increases in public and private research investment, including by the 
    biotechnology industry may help to reduce the production costs.
 
 Development of flex-fuel vehicle engines that run on low- or high-level 
    blends of ethanol or gasoline, has been a major step forward to support the 
    increased uptake of biofuels. With over 6 million such vehicles already 
    running on the roads of Brazil, the U.S., Sweden and elsewhere, and more 
    auto manufacturers showing interest, demand is likely to continue. Plug-in 
    hybrid, flex-fuel engine vehicles may be the way of the future.
 
 However one key point to note is that energy-efficiency measures to reduce 
    road transport demand must still be encouraged.
 
 Summary
 
 Overall the Sustainable Biofuels Consensus highlights the opportunities that 
    sustainably produced biofuels could bring if managed carefully. South to 
    South collaborations (as for example Brazil recently announcing a major 
    investment in sugarcane production and ethanol processing in Ghana) can 
    provide positive benefits to all parties. Coupled with the current push to 
    provide improved crop species, better knowledge of fertiliser use and water 
    management for food crop production, it could be that well managed and 
    sustainably produced biofuels, although certainly not a panacea for rising 
    oil demand, could make some contribution towards sustainable development, 
    energy security, equity and greenhouse gas abatement.
 
 Click here to download the 8-page Sustainable Biofuels Consensus.
 
 Ralph Sims is Professor of Sustainable Energy at Massey University, New 
    Zealand where he began his research career producing biodiesel from animal 
    fats in the early 1970s. He is currently based at the Renewable Energy Unit 
    of the International Energy Agency, Paris. He was the Coordinating Lead 
    Author of the "Energy Supply" chapter of the IPCC 4th Assessment Report and 
    is a Companion of the Royal Society. His many publications on energy and 
    climate change mitigation include the book "The Brilliance of Bioenergy - in 
    Business and in Practice."
 
 
 
 The information and views expressed in this article are those of the 
    author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the 
    companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.
  To subscribe or visit go to: 
http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com
 |