| Global Warming Bill Would Slash Pollutants, Add 
    Tax Relief   May 21 - Knight Ridder Washington Bureau
 The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on Wednesday offered 
    legislation to slash greenhouse gas emissions in the coming decades while 
    adding protections for consumers and industries.
 
 The measure would be the country's most ambitious effort to reshape the 
    economy, change the way energy is produced and used, and head off 
    potentially catastrophic climate changes such as rising sea levels and mass 
    extinctions.
 
 For the first time, the bill sets a system that would cap the overall amount 
    of earth-warming pollution that U.S. companies can emit and reduces the 
    amount each year through 2050.
 
 Companies would be required to pay for permits to pollute. They could sell 
    or save permits they don't need to use immediately, and in some cases the 
    government would grant permits to help companies make the transition to an 
    economy in which carbon is controlled.
 
 The new measure adds several major new elements to a version of the bill 
    passed by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee in December. The 
    Senate will start debate on the new version of the legislation the first 
    week in June.
 
 The new parts include:
 
 -A cost containment plan. If the price of carbon allowances sold on the 
    market reaches a certain level, a limited amount of additional allowances 
    would be released onto the market to lower the price. These allowances would 
    be borrowed from future amounts, so that the end goal in 2050 could still be 
    met.
 
 -Help for consumers: The bill would set aside an estimated $800 billion in 
    tax relief from the sale of allowances through 2050 for people who need help 
    paying for energy. The details remain to be worked out.
 
 It also provides an estimated $911 billion through 2050 that would be 
    distributed through local electric and gas distribution companies to help 
    consumers offset higher energy prices and to promote efficiency and clean 
    energy.
 
 -Proceeds from the sales of some allowances would be transferred to the 
    Treasury to ensure that the system would not increase the deficit.
 
 Just under half of all pollution permits would be sold at auction. The rest 
    would be handed out to carbon-intensive industries to help them make the 
    transition to cleaner energy and to states and other public entities to 
    reduce energy-related hardships, improve efficiency and cope with problems 
    caused by global warming.
 
 The legislation says that 89 percent of all permits would be used for public 
    purposes. Proceeds from some of the allowances would be used to develop 
    clean-energy technologies.
 
 Although the bill covers most of the greenhouse gases emitted in the United 
    States, its goal for reductions by 2050 is less than what international 
    scientists say is needed to prevent catastrophic climate change.
 
 "I think the bill has been strengthened enormously," said Sen. Barbara 
    Boxer, D-Calif., the chairwoman of the Senate environment panel. She said 
    the bill would create new jobs, ensure a level playing field for American 
    businesses and protect consumers so that they don't suffer from high costs.
 
 Boxer said she hopes that over time the goals for emissions can be 
    toughened.
 
 Republican John McCain and Democrats Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama all 
    support an economy-wide cap and trade program. President Bush prefers 
    voluntary reductions.
 
 Boxer said it was important to start work on the bill.
 
 "Landmark bills don't pass in a week or a day," she said.
 
 One hot part of the debate will be on how to ensure that China and India 
    impose emissions cuts of their own.
 
 The new bill would require that importers pay a fee for products from 
    companies that do not have emission limits. Some experts say such fees could 
    spark retaliatory trade measures or encourage the countries to sell their 
    products elsewhere, and would not be effective in getting them to impose 
    emissions cuts.
 
 A study released Wednesday by two Washington research organizations, the 
    Peterson Institute for International Economics and the World Resources 
    Institute, argued that the best way to ensure a level playing field would be 
    to pursue international agreements and target relief at U.S. industries most 
    affected by emissions controls and facing international competition.
 
 The report "Leveling the Carbon Playing Field: International Competition and 
    U.S. Climate Policy Design" can be read at www.wri.org.
 
 The legislation is called the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act, after 
    its cosponsors, Sens. Joe Lieberman, an independent Democrat from 
    Connecticut, and John Warner, a Republican from Virginia.
 
 To read the latest version of the bill: http://epw.senate.gov, click on 
    "information on the Boxer-Lieberman-Warner Substitute to the 
    Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act, S. 2191"
 
 ___
 
 (c) 2008, McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
 
 Visit the McClatchy Washington Bureau on the World Wide Web at 
    www.mcclatchydc.com.
 |