| Global Warming Bill Would Slash Pollutants, Add
Tax Relief
May 21 - Knight Ridder Washington Bureau
The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on Wednesday offered
legislation to slash greenhouse gas emissions in the coming decades while
adding protections for consumers and industries.
The measure would be the country's most ambitious effort to reshape the
economy, change the way energy is produced and used, and head off
potentially catastrophic climate changes such as rising sea levels and mass
extinctions.
For the first time, the bill sets a system that would cap the overall amount
of earth-warming pollution that U.S. companies can emit and reduces the
amount each year through 2050.
Companies would be required to pay for permits to pollute. They could sell
or save permits they don't need to use immediately, and in some cases the
government would grant permits to help companies make the transition to an
economy in which carbon is controlled.
The new measure adds several major new elements to a version of the bill
passed by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee in December. The
Senate will start debate on the new version of the legislation the first
week in June.
The new parts include:
-A cost containment plan. If the price of carbon allowances sold on the
market reaches a certain level, a limited amount of additional allowances
would be released onto the market to lower the price. These allowances would
be borrowed from future amounts, so that the end goal in 2050 could still be
met.
-Help for consumers: The bill would set aside an estimated $800 billion in
tax relief from the sale of allowances through 2050 for people who need help
paying for energy. The details remain to be worked out.
It also provides an estimated $911 billion through 2050 that would be
distributed through local electric and gas distribution companies to help
consumers offset higher energy prices and to promote efficiency and clean
energy.
-Proceeds from the sales of some allowances would be transferred to the
Treasury to ensure that the system would not increase the deficit.
Just under half of all pollution permits would be sold at auction. The rest
would be handed out to carbon-intensive industries to help them make the
transition to cleaner energy and to states and other public entities to
reduce energy-related hardships, improve efficiency and cope with problems
caused by global warming.
The legislation says that 89 percent of all permits would be used for public
purposes. Proceeds from some of the allowances would be used to develop
clean-energy technologies.
Although the bill covers most of the greenhouse gases emitted in the United
States, its goal for reductions by 2050 is less than what international
scientists say is needed to prevent catastrophic climate change.
"I think the bill has been strengthened enormously," said Sen. Barbara
Boxer, D-Calif., the chairwoman of the Senate environment panel. She said
the bill would create new jobs, ensure a level playing field for American
businesses and protect consumers so that they don't suffer from high costs.
Boxer said she hopes that over time the goals for emissions can be
toughened.
Republican John McCain and Democrats Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama all
support an economy-wide cap and trade program. President Bush prefers
voluntary reductions.
Boxer said it was important to start work on the bill.
"Landmark bills don't pass in a week or a day," she said.
One hot part of the debate will be on how to ensure that China and India
impose emissions cuts of their own.
The new bill would require that importers pay a fee for products from
companies that do not have emission limits. Some experts say such fees could
spark retaliatory trade measures or encourage the countries to sell their
products elsewhere, and would not be effective in getting them to impose
emissions cuts.
A study released Wednesday by two Washington research organizations, the
Peterson Institute for International Economics and the World Resources
Institute, argued that the best way to ensure a level playing field would be
to pursue international agreements and target relief at U.S. industries most
affected by emissions controls and facing international competition.
The report "Leveling the Carbon Playing Field: International Competition and
U.S. Climate Policy Design" can be read at www.wri.org.
The legislation is called the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act, after
its cosponsors, Sens. Joe Lieberman, an independent Democrat from
Connecticut, and John Warner, a Republican from Virginia.
To read the latest version of the bill: http://epw.senate.gov, click on
"information on the Boxer-Lieberman-Warner Substitute to the
Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act, S. 2191"
___
(c) 2008, McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
Visit the McClatchy Washington Bureau on the World Wide Web at
www.mcclatchydc.com. |