There continues to be a community of people who stubbornly
resist jumping on the global warming bandwagon. They're
the people who will ruin your Earth Day party. To a lot of
us, they seem as out of touch as "the world is flat"
believers of another era (obviously before the Thomas
Friedman book of the same name).
Concerns about man-made climate change continue to gain
energy. We take a look at the other side with an article
in this issue, about the skepticism over the need to curb
our greenhouse gas emissions.
We've presented that position in the past as it's come
up in the global warming discussion, but increasingly it
became a stand that few took seriously. Or so we thought.
We continue to get letters from readers complaining about
the assumption by environmentalists, politicians, the
media, etc., that we have to take dramatic steps to reduce
our carbon dioxide emissions.
So we pursued the story with good journalistic
intentions, to present all sides of an issue no matter how
unpopular. But honestly, the story idea gave us some pause
internally. We think we've pretty soundly established that
what appears on our editorial pages is an objective
reflection of the thought and action in the field we
cover. Nevertheless, we are aware that merely running such
a story would be seen by some as endorsing the position of
a bunch of kooks.
The fact that I'm writing this column at least in part
to explain why we're running this story shows the strong
emotion behind the global warming fears. Depending on your
point of view, it's either because that position is
clearly right -- or we're too insecure about the topic to
even consider another side. And that would be dangerous.
Earth Day just passed with an amazing amount of mania.
Just about everyone is doing something to be green, and
they want the world to know it. It officially reached full
pop culture status when I heard about the Low Carbon Diet.
My favorite was the tongue-in-cheek product idea of
environmentally labeled toilet paper that encourages you
to use both sides.
Treating the environment with respect is a noble cause.
But that spirit can't blind us into thinking everything
labeled environmental makes sense. And it can't blind us
to at least looking at all sides of the issue.
Pete Fehrenbach is
managing editor of Waste News. Past installments of this
column are collected in
the Inbox archive.
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.wastenews.com