| Organic Photovoltaics: the Good, the Bad, and 
    the Inefficient by Joe Kwiatkowski, Physicist, Imperial College London
 May 19, 2008
 What if making a solar cell was as easy as printing a newspaper? What if it 
    was flexible, light and above all, cheap? The current photovoltaic (PV) 
    market, dominated by expensive and fragile silicon, would be revolutionized. 
    These are the lofty ambitions of a growing number of scientists in companies 
    and universities worldwide who are developing organic photovoltaics: solar 
    cells that are made from carbon-based molecules.
 
 Successful large scale commercialization of solar energy depends on three 
    criteria in particular: efficiency, lifetime and cost. Much of the early 
    excitement in organic photovoltaics arose from expectations that they could 
    be very cheap. First, the chemicals industry already manufactures organic 
    molecules by the kiloton and sells them cheap. Second, making an organic 
    solar cell is wonderfully slapdash when compared to the care needed in 
    making a silicon solar cell. However, efficiency and lifetime remain 
    stubborn thorns in the side of advocates of organic photovoltaics: 
    efficiencies waiver around 5% and ironically, although reasonably stable in 
    the dark, organic materials tend to degrade in the light.
 
 Both the advantages and the shortcomings of organic photovoltaics can be 
    understood in terms of their material properties. Whereas the building block 
    of other solar cells like silicon is the atom, the building block of organic 
    cells is the molecule (a collection of atoms into well-defined groups). This 
    fundamental difference has far-reaching implications for the performance of 
    organic solar cells.
 
 Because molecules are larger than atoms, they are easier to work with. For 
    example, by dissolving them in a solvent they can be turned into an ink that 
    can then be printed in much the same way as a newspaper. As evidenced the 
    daily press, printing is cheap and fast; the area of print produced every 
    day for a typical newspaper is on the same order of magnitude as the area of 
    all the solar cells produced every year from a large polysilicon plant.
 
 Not only are the molecules easier to handle than atoms, it is also easy make 
    new designs with molecules. Whereas it is difficult to build an entirely new 
    material when starting from atoms, almost anything can be built when 
    starting from molecules. Indeed, the number of molecules that could 
    potentially be used in an organic cell are limited only by the imagination 
    of the synthetic chemist. This means that organic solar cells could be 
    customized for a particular application or market. Massachusetts-based 
    Konarka, for example, can manufacture cells with different color schemes 
    including cells that are camouflaged for their military customers. More 
    importantly, researchers hope that by careful design and with repeated 
    tweaks, molecules can be developed that will satisfy all three criteria 
    necessary for a successful solar cell: efficiency, lifetime and cost.
 
 One benefit of the huge molecular portfolio available to organic 
    photovoltaics is the ability to choose molecules that absorb sunlight very 
    efficiently. As a result organic solar cells can be made 1000 times thinner 
    than silicon solar cells, thereby offering huge savings on materials. 
    Furthermore, because they are thin, the cells are also flexible and could be 
    printed on a roll-to-roll process, transported easily and simply unrolled on 
    the customer's roof. Konarka, amongst others, is also developing cells that 
    can be incorporated into tents or clothes.
 
 Another advantage of moving from atoms to molecules, is that it opens 
    photovoltaics to entirely new industries. For example, powerful chemical 
    companies such as BASF, Merck, and Dow have recently realized that the large 
    scale manufacture of organic solar cells could provide an enormous market 
    for their products. To encourage the development of organic photovoltaics 
    and to ensure their place in any future markets, these companies have 
    devoted substantial manpower and funds to photovoltaics research.
 
 Whilst organic photovoltaics may have cost advantages and whilst they may 
    open up a range of other exciting possibilities, they also have 
    shortcomings. To efficiently extract electricity from a solar cell, 
    electrical charges need to be able to travel through it quickly. If charges 
    move slowly they are likely to become stuck or recombine with other charges 
    (of opposite polarity) and disappear altogether. As a result, the number of 
    electrical charges available to do useful work, such as recharging a 
    battery, is diminished. It is not hard to get charges out of a silicon solar 
    cell because its atoms are neatly arranged into crystals and and so charges 
    can fly between them at enormous speeds. However, molecules are less 
    ordered, particularly when printed, and so charges move much more slowly 
    between them. To further compound the problem molecules hold onto a charge 
    very tightly and are reluctant to pass it on to their neighbors. Because 
    electricity can't flow easily, the efficiency of an organic solar cell is 
    limited.
 
 Sadly, it's not only a problem of getting electrical charges out of an 
    organic solar cell: it's also a problem of generating them. When a solar 
    cell absorbs sunlight it gains energy but, being uncomfortable in this 
    state, it attempts to discharge that energy. Ideally it does so by 
    generating two charges but alternatively it may simply throw the energy away 
    as heat. Solar cells are designed to favor the former process: silicon cells 
    consist of two doped regions that attract positive and negative charges, and 
    organic cells attempt the same effect using two different types of molecule. 
    However, whilst the process is very efficient in silicon, it is less so in 
    organic cells.
 
 Whilst poor generation and extraction of electrical charges limits the 
    efficiency of organic photovoltaics, a further problem is lifetime. If you 
    take the care to build a material from atoms, it will generally last a 
    fairly long time. In comparison, molecules are fickle entities that will 
    react with other molecules such as oxygen and water. In doing so, they 
    change. They might absorb less light, or generate fewer charges, or actually 
    trap charges and prevent them from being collected. It is an unfortunate, 
    but ironic, fact that molecules are more likely degrade in this way whilst 
    illuminated.
 
 As with any new technology, there are many high hurdles to be cleared before 
    a finished product can be sold. However, the excitement growing worldwide is 
    testament to the potentials of organic photovoltaics; a coalition of the 
    German government, BASF, Bosh, and others recently announced an organic 
    photovoltaics research program to the tune of US $570 million. Maybe organic 
    photovoltaics are a long way from competing directly with silicon; however, 
    they would open niche markets and, with such serious backing, it would be 
    surprising if somebody didn't make money from molecules at some point.
 
 Joe Kwiatkowski is a physicist at Imperial College London, where he works 
    on organic photovoltaics. His current interest is the development of 
    computational methods that can aid the design and optimization of new 
    photovoltaic materials.
 
 The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author 
    and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that 
    advertise on its Web site and other publications.
  To subscribe or visit go to: 
http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com
 |