| Political cost of Cherokee stance on freedmen 
    continues to mount Posted: May 09, 2008
 by: Jerry Reynolds / Indian Country Today
 WASHINGTON - Thirty-five members of the Congressional Black Caucus have 
    informed Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., that they will actively 
    oppose reauthorization of the Native American Housing and Self-Determination 
    Assistance Act unless it cuts off funding to the Cherokee Nation of 
    Oklahoma, pending the nation's recognition of Cherokee freedmen and their 
    descendants as tribal citizens.
 
 The freedmen are descendants of slaves and free blacks who lived among the 
    Cherokee before, during and after the Civil War. The Cherokee, a 
    slave-owning tribe from its origins in the Southeast, sided with the 
    Confederacy at the outset of the Civil War, later switching its allegiance 
    to the Union. An 1866 treaty renewed federal relations with the Cherokee and 
    conferred all rights of native Cherokees on the freedmen and their 
    descendants. U.S. District Court Judge Henry H. Kennedy has found that the 
    Cherokee soon began to marginalize the freedmen; and in 2003, not for the 
    first time, the tribe tried to expel them through changes to its 
    constitution.
 
 The ultimate disposition of the case is still in doubt. But increasingly, 
    Congress is not.
 
 The NAHASDA bill, H.R. 2786 in the House of Representatives, has passed in 
    that chamber, and a Senate counterpart, S. 2062, is on the legislative 
    calendar. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the Financial Services 
    Committee in the House, maintains that it will not become law without the 
    provision against Cherokee funding. Rep. Melvin Watt, D-N.C., and a member 
    of Financial Services, has called for a reality check on the Cherokee, after 
    initially holding out hope of a rapprochement.
 
 A hard-fought bill to reauthorize the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, 
    the top priority of the National Congress of American Indians in the current 
    110th Congress, has passed the full Senate (as S. 1200) and the House 
    Natural Resources Committee (as H.R. 1328). But Rep. G.K. Butterfield, D-N.C., 
    and others in the House have signaled intentions to amend the bill in the 
    Energy and Commerce Committee, with a similar provision forbidding Cherokee 
    funding over the freedmen. Both Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means, the 
    third House committee with jurisdiction over the bill, have until June 6 to 
    consider H.R. 1328.
 
 Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., continues to push a bill that would sever 
    federal relations with the Cherokee and revoke their casino charter until 
    the freedmen are restored to full citizenship. Her bill, H.R. 2824 in the 
    House, has 24 co-sponsors and she hopes to hold public hearings on it yet 
    this year.
 
 In a mid-April letter to tribal leaders, National American Indian Housing 
    Council Chairman Marty Shuravloff wrote, ''The NAIHC is very concerned that 
    the Freedmen matter might upend not only the pending NAHASDA reauthorization 
    but the passage of all Indian tribal legislation in this and possibly future 
    congresses. This would be an unfortunate outcome for the hundreds of 
    thousands of American Indian and Alaska Native low income families that 
    would be unwitting victims in a controversy involving one Indian tribe.''
   © 1998 - 2008 
    Indian Country Today. All Rights Reserved   To subscribe or 
    visit go to:  
    http://www.indiancountry.com  |