| US Democratic Candidates Play Up "Clean Coal" 
    US: May 13, 2008
 
 
 CLEAR FORK, W.Va. - Both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are talking more 
    about "clean coal" and less about global warming as they woo voters in West 
    Virginia and Kentucky -- two states that sit at the heart of the nation's 
    coal economy.
 
 
 In a bid to draw voters ahead of Democratic primaries in West Virginia on 
    Tuesday and Kentucky on May 20, both candidates are playing up the ascendant 
    role of commercially untested and so far economically nonviable ways of 
    converting America's plentiful coal supplies into electricity without 
    spewing massive quantities of heat-trapping greenhouse gases.
 
 "We need some big investments right now in figuring out how to capture and 
    store carbon dioxide from coal," Clinton told a rally in the rural town of 
    Clear Fork on Monday.
 
 To get there, she took a windy road through the Appalachian Mountains that 
    passed at least four big coal mines cut into the mountainside.
 
 Not to be outdone, Obama's campaign has distributed flyers in Kentucky 
    stating that "Barack Obama believes in clean Kentucky coal." The flyers show 
    a picture of giant barges carrying coal down the Ohio River.
 
 Coal-fired power plants generate about half of US electricity supplies, and 
    account for about 40 percent of US greenhouse gas emissions -- the biggest 
    single industrial source.
 
 Clinton has a plan to require US industry to cut carbon dioxide emissions by 
    80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050, but she hasn't brought that up in 
    numerous appearances in West Virginia and Kentucky in recent days.
 
 But America has 250 years worth of coal, and will likely remain the backbone 
    of its power generation system for decades. "I know how important coal is to 
    West Virginia," Clinton said last week in the state's capitol rotunda in 
    Charleston. "Coal is not going anywhere for the foreseeable future."
 
 Candidates' support for clean coal indicates a tension between their need to 
    bring along delegate-rich coal states like Pennsylvania and Illinois and 
    their global warming platforms.
 
 "There is no such animal as clean coal," said Brent Blackwelder, president 
    of the environmental group Friends of the Earth. "We shouldn't be placing 
    our bets on coal to bail us out. We need to be looking at getting rid of 
    coal plants."
 
 Among Eastern US states, West Virginia and Kentucky lead the pack in coal 
    production and employ about half of US coal industry workers -- about 39,000 
    people.
 
 Both candidates support legislation that could be debated by the Senate this 
    summer that would require US industry to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 
    more than 70 percent by 2050.
 
 Coal states don't hold the same clout as Farm Belt states who control about 
    a quarter of US Electoral College votes and have pushed for higher 
    government mandates to boost US consumption of ethanol -- made mostly from 
    corn.
 
 But "Big Coal" states are not to be ignored on the electoral map. And as the 
    Democratic presidential process comes down to the wire, coal plays 
    prominently in three of the six remaining primaries including Montana on 
    June 3.
 
 Coal industry officials said US electric utilities are willing to embrace 
    carbon-reduction strategies but cannot simply shut down coal-fired plants 
    without a massive increase in electricity prices.
 
 "The US doesn't just have an environmental problem -- it has an energy 
    supply problem," said Luke Popovich, spokesman for the National Mining 
    Association. "We simply cannot zero out coal use because it is not 
    pristine."
 
 Not all environmental groups take such a hard line on the clean coal, 
    pointing out that it's only natural for politicians to craft their message 
    to their audience.
 
 "The candidates appear to be following a tried and true tradition which is 
    telling the audience what they want to hear," said Frank O'Donnell, 
    president of Clean Air Watch, a nonpartisan environmental group. "It's 
    politics as usual."
 
 Even Al Gore, who has become a spokesman for the dangers of climate change, 
    steered clear of talking about global warming when he campaigned in West 
    Virginia ahead of the 2000 presidential elections, O'Donnell said.
 
 The deletion did not pay off for Gore in the end -- West Virginia cast its 
    lot with Republican George W. Bush instead.
 
 (Editing by David Wiessler)
 
 
 Story by Chris Baltimore
 
 
 REUTERS NEWS SERVICE
 
  |