US airlines at a competitive disadvantage
Successful hedgers have ideally hedged about 50% of their fuel needs but
their advantage really lies in having managed risk proactively years ago
compared with their counterparts, which are left with spot prices or minimal
hedges ranging around 20%, an airlines analyst at UBS analyst said.
The toll on the airlines industry is significant; every $1/b increase in the
price of oil costs Delta about $60 million.
Delta Airlines has hedged 29% of its 2008 fuel needs and only 10% and 5% of
it 2009 and 2010 needs respectively, its first quarter SEC filing shows.
The airline relies heavily on crude oil call options for its risk management
needs but also has exposure to jet fuel and heating oil swaps.
Northwest Airlines, which for the quarter ended March 31 recorded a net loss
of $4.1 billion, hedged the price of approximately 30% of its projected fuel
requirements for the remainder of 2008 through a combination of crude oil
collars and three-way collars, but all its existing fuel derivative
contracts expire on or before the year end (podcast: Nymex crude and heating
oil contracts send jet fuel price soaring).
A fair amount of the rise in jet fuel prices are in tandem with firmness in
crude oil prices. Platts' WTI prompt-month spot price assessments have risen
by about 38% in the past twelve-months.
The toll on the airlines industry is significant; every $1/b increase in the
price of oil costs Delta about $60 million (see chart: NYMEX sweet crude
oil).
"The increase from $110/b to $115/b in the first two weeks of May alone will
cost Delta over $300 million on an annual basis," Anderson said.
While last year, refineries' crude oil acquisition costs have risen by
approximately 8%, end-users absorbed a jet fuel price hike of 17% as the
pace of jet fuel outstripped that of crude to push crack spreads to levels
only seen during after force-majeure events, EIA data implies.
Jet fuel crack spreads currently hover around $30/b, six times greater than
the traditional $5/b crack spread. But despite the obviously profitable
refining economics, the issue of whether refineries are able to turn cracks
into yields is contentious, at least in the US.
Many US refineries are configured to produce light-end products, such as
gasoline and naphtha, and initial refinery capital investment and upgrades
generally pay off in the long term.
Hence due to infrastructure limitations, US refineries are not nimble enough
to switch to jet fuel production even when the economics permits. This puts
US airlines at a competitive disadvantage compared with their European
counterparts (see chart: Chicago Jet Rack Price).
As diesel - a heavier grade product closer to jet fuel than gasoline is-
dominates refinery outputs in Europe, it is relatively easier to switch to
jet fuel production in Europe than it is in the US, sources say. This boosts
the availability of products in Europe.
In addition, European and certain Asian end-users have advantage when
purchasing dollar-denominated commodities such as jet fuel as they collect
revenues in Euro, Pound Sterling, and Yen, which are at a premium to the US
dollar, industry trade organizations say.
US dollar's weakness has created a $40/b, or a 37% price parity for US-based
airlines purchasing jet fuel, the ATA says.
To illustrate, Northwest Airlines, with a hub in Japan, has significant
revenue and expense exposure to exchange rate fluctuations.
Mindful of its delicate balance book since it emerged from bankruptcy last
May, the company is keen to hedge its currency exposure with financial
instruments such as collars or put options.
As of March 31 2008, the company had hedged approximately 48% of its
anticipated yen-denominated sales for the remainder of the year with forward
contracts.
|