| US airlines at a competitive disadvantage 
    
 Successful hedgers have ideally hedged about 50% of their fuel needs but 
    their advantage really lies in having managed risk proactively years ago 
    compared with their counterparts, which are left with spot prices or minimal 
    hedges ranging around 20%, an airlines analyst at UBS analyst said.
 The toll on the airlines industry is significant; every $1/b increase in the 
    price of oil costs Delta about $60 million.
 
 Delta Airlines has hedged 29% of its 2008 fuel needs and only 10% and 5% of 
    it 2009 and 2010 needs respectively, its first quarter SEC filing shows.
 
 The airline relies heavily on crude oil call options for its risk management 
    needs but also has exposure to jet fuel and heating oil swaps.
 
 Northwest Airlines, which for the quarter ended March 31 recorded a net loss 
    of $4.1 billion, hedged the price of approximately 30% of its projected fuel 
    requirements for the remainder of 2008 through a combination of crude oil 
    collars and three-way collars, but all its existing fuel derivative 
    contracts expire on or before the year end (podcast: Nymex crude and heating 
    oil contracts send jet fuel price soaring).
 
 A fair amount of the rise in jet fuel prices are in tandem with firmness in 
    crude oil prices. Platts' WTI prompt-month spot price assessments have risen 
    by about 38% in the past twelve-months.
 
 The toll on the airlines industry is significant; every $1/b increase in the 
    price of oil costs Delta about $60 million (see chart: NYMEX sweet crude 
    oil).
 
 "The increase from $110/b to $115/b in the first two weeks of May alone will 
    cost Delta over $300 million on an annual basis," Anderson said.
 
 While last year, refineries' crude oil acquisition costs have risen by 
    approximately 8%, end-users absorbed a jet fuel price hike of 17% as the 
    pace of jet fuel outstripped that of crude to push crack spreads to levels 
    only seen during after force-majeure events, EIA data implies.
 
 Jet fuel crack spreads currently hover around $30/b, six times greater than 
    the traditional $5/b crack spread. But despite the obviously profitable 
    refining economics, the issue of whether refineries are able to turn cracks 
    into yields is contentious, at least in the US.
 
 Many US refineries are configured to produce light-end products, such as 
    gasoline and naphtha, and initial refinery capital investment and upgrades 
    generally pay off in the long term.
 
 Hence due to infrastructure limitations, US refineries are not nimble enough 
    to switch to jet fuel production even when the economics permits. This puts 
    US airlines at a competitive disadvantage compared with their European 
    counterparts (see chart: Chicago Jet Rack Price).
 
 As diesel - a heavier grade product closer to jet fuel than gasoline is- 
    dominates refinery outputs in Europe, it is relatively easier to switch to 
    jet fuel production in Europe than it is in the US, sources say. This boosts 
    the availability of products in Europe.
 
 In addition, European and certain Asian end-users have advantage when 
    purchasing dollar-denominated commodities such as jet fuel as they collect 
    revenues in Euro, Pound Sterling, and Yen, which are at a premium to the US 
    dollar, industry trade organizations say.
 
 US dollar's weakness has created a $40/b, or a 37% price parity for US-based 
    airlines purchasing jet fuel, the ATA says.
 
 To illustrate, Northwest Airlines, with a hub in Japan, has significant 
    revenue and expense exposure to exchange rate fluctuations.
 
 Mindful of its delicate balance book since it emerged from bankruptcy last 
    May, the company is keen to hedge its currency exposure with financial 
    instruments such as collars or put options.
 
 As of March 31 2008, the company had hedged approximately 48% of its 
    anticipated yen-denominated sales for the remainder of the year with forward 
    contracts.
   |