Poll: World wants green action, despite costs
Sixty-nine percent of those polled in 21 countries say utility
firms should be obliged to use more renewable resources, even if this would
increase their monthly bills.
By
Peter Ford| Staff writer of The Christian
Science Monitor/ November 19,
2008 edition
Reporter Peter Ford discusses a 21-nation poll that shows
citizens want their governments to take stronger action to help prevent
climate change.
|
Beijing
A wide majority of the world’s citizens are unhappy with the slow pace of
their governments’ moves toward renewable energy and want their leaders to
do more, even if that raises their utility bills, according to a global
opinion poll released today.
The finding sends a clear signal to officials at next month’s climate change
meeting in Poznan, Poland, scheduled to lay the groundwork for a 2009
international treaty to limit greenhouse-gas emissions.
“Governments have left a lot on the table in terms of public readiness to
take action,” says Steven Kull, head of the Program on International Policy
Attitudes at the University of Maryland, which conducted the 21-nation poll.
“I was struck by the consistency and strength of support” for greater
reliance on solar and wind power to generate electricity, he adds. “People
think of this as an investment and a transition. They are optimistic.”
From Buenos Aires to Nairobi to Beijing, only 40 percent of respondents said
they thought more coal, oil, and nuclear power plants were needed.
Seventy-seven percent said their governments should put more emphasis on
solar and wind energy systems, and 69 percent said utility companies should
be obliged to use more renewable energy sources “even if this increases the
cost of energy in the short run.”
Fifty-eight percent also said they were ready to pay higher prices for goods
if the money was used to help businesses use energy more sparingly.
In the long run, two-thirds of respondents felt a major shift to alternative
sources of energy would save money rather than hurt the economy.
Concerns about oil supplies
Behind these figures, says Dr. Kull, lie fears of climate change and worries
about the reliability and cost of oil supplies. “That has caused people to
look to alternatives,” he says.
“Energy security and climate change loom large” in many parts of the world,
adds Antony Froggatt, an energy specialist at the Chatham House think tank
in London. “Renewables and energy efficiency simultaneously address both
concerns.”
At the same time, the poll also seems to suggest that increasing numbers of
people believe that a shift away from fossil fuel toward renewable energy
sources offers practical and immediate economic benefits.
Barack Obama’s victory in the recent US presidential elections was a signal
of this trend, argues Keith Schneider, spokesman for the Apollo Alliance of
businesses, unions, and environmentalists in the US, which advocates rapid
development of “clean technology.”
Obama plan over ‘drill baby, drill’?
Mr. Obama’s plan to invest $150 billion over 10 years in “clean technology”
is designed to create 5 million new jobs in the sector, the president-elect
has said.
“Obama made clean energy one of his three basic visions,” says Mr.
Schneider. “ ‘Drill, baby, drill’ sounded good, but Obama won the election.
People understand that this is an investment in their futures.”
Speaking to a bipartisan group of governors by video on Tuesday, Obama said
that despite the weakening economy, he had no intention of softening or
delaying his aggressive targets for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions.
“Now is the time to confront this challenge once and for all,” Obama said.
“Delay is no longer an option. Denial is no longer an acceptable response.”
Financial crisis may dampen zeal
In the short term, Kull predicts, the financial crisis and the global
recession it has spawned “will probably have some dampening effect” on
public enthusiasm worldwide for a quick shift to renewable energy sources,
given the initial investment costs of such a move.
Dallas Kachan, managing director of the Cleantech Group, which promotes
“green” business investment, notes that public concern about climate change
was more noticeable a year ago “before rising gas prices made people look
more at their pocket book than at the polar icecaps.”
Investors stand by ‘clean tech’
But the poll numbers “show a fairly large wellspring of support for
significant change … even if people are not ready to go as far as they were
six months ago,” says Kull. And investor interest in “clean technology” is
still growing strongly, Mr. Kachan points out; Venture capitalists invested
$6.6 billion in the sector worldwide in the first nine months of this year,
up 10 percent from the total for the whole of 2007, he says.
Indeed, with advocates holding out the promise of growth and jobs in
renewable energy – making and installing new technology – “a lot of people
are saying that the current situation offers an opportunity we cannot miss
to create a “green New Deal,” says Mr. Froggatt. “Renewable energy and
energy efficiency can be a fundamental part of revitalizing our economies.”
“The way Barack Obama made alternative energy a major part of his jobs
program was quite popular,” Kull points out. “I see no reason why that would
not be the case in other countries. When that is aligned with long-term
concerns about climate change it would have a lot of appeal.”
The economic potential of renewable energy is equally attractive to
governments facing a slowdown.
China, for example “hopes to take this opportunity to upgrade [its]industrial
restructuring” away from traditional low-cost, low-margin industries toward
more sophisticated and profitable sectors, said Xie Zhenhua, vice chairman
of China’s National Development and Reform Commission recently.
Although China is the largest producer of solar panels in the world, and one
of the top producers of wind energy, it still generates only 8.3 percent of
its electricity from renewable resources according to official figures, and
is expected to rely very heavily on coal for the foreseeable future, because
it is cheap.
Other governments, too, are reluctant to pay the price that shifting to new
technologies will demand, and persuading them to do so more quickly will not
be easy despite the clear trend in public opinion, Kull warns.
“The short-term costs are always a problem and organized economic interests
are invested in the status quo,” he says. “Support for change is very
widespread, but it is not very well organized.”
www.csmonitor.com | Copyright ©
2008 The Christian Science Monitor. All rights reserved. |