|
From: metro
Published October 13, 2008 09:30 AM
Global warming getting political cold shoulder in U.S.
amid economic woes
WASHINGTON - The global economic crisis has thrown a political chill over
one of the main initiatives under consideration in the United States to
combat global warming: the so-called cap-and-trade plan.
Democratic leaders in the House and the Senate, and both presidential
candidates, continue to rank tackling global warming as a chief goal next
year.
But the focus on stabilizing the economy probably will make it more
difficult to pass a law to reduce carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
At the very least, it will push back when the reductions would have to
start.
As one Republican senator put it, the green bubble has burst.
"Clearly it is somewhere down the totem pole given the economic realities
we are facing," said Tom Williams, a spokesman for Duke Energy Corp., an
electricity producer that has supported federal mandates on greenhouse
gases.
Duke is a member of the U.S. Climate Action Partnership, an association of
businesses and non-profit groups that has lobbied Congress to act.
Just months ago, chances for legislation passing in the next Congress and
becoming law looked promising. The presidential candidates support mandatory
cuts and a Democratic majority is ready to act on the problem after years of
the Bush administration resistance.
But the most popular remedy for slowing global warming, a mechanism know as
cap-and-trade, could put further stress on a teetering economy.
Under such a system, the government would establish a market for carbon
dioxide by giving or selling credits to companies with operations that emit
greenhouse gases. The companies can then choose whether to invest in
technologies to reduce emissions to meet targets or instead buy credits from
other companies who have already met them.
In an interview with The Associated Press, Representative Rick Boucher (D-Va.),
said that in light of the economic downturn, a bill that would give
polluters permits free of charge would be preferable.
"The first way we can control program costs is by not charging industrial
emitters," said Boucher, who released a first draft of a bill this past week
with the chairman of the House energy and commerce committee, Representative
John Dingell ( D-Mich.). Giving away right-to-pollute permits was one of the
options.
Other Democrats, however, see a cap-and-trade bill - and the government
revenues it would generate from selling permits - as an engine for economic
growth. Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama supports auctioning off
all permits, using the money to help fund alternative energy.
http://www.metronews.ca/edmonton/world/article/124810 |