NCAI passes record number of resolutions
Seventy-two motions address recognition,
litigation, health care, other issues

By Gale Courey Toensing
Story Published: Oct 31, 2008
PHOENIX – From federal
recognition to turning fee lands into trust lands, from truth-in-labeling
to a task force on tribal taxation and dozens of issues in between, the
National Congress of American Indians passed a record 72 resolutions
during its 65th annual conference Oct. 19 – 24.
Members of NCAI committees met daily during the week, between area caucus
meetings, special presentations and appearances by local, state and
federal officials, to deliberate over issues and fine-tune the language of
the resolutions presented on the conference’s last day.
The committees operate under five broad categories: economic, finance and
community development; litigation and governance; veterans; human
resources; and land and natural resources, in addition to the executive
committee.
NCAI’s executive committee was first, with President Joe Garcia presenting
the resolutions in a report to the membership. Among the dozen-plus
executive committee’s resolutions were:
• A policy on federal recognition of Indian tribes.
NCAI strongly supports the recognition of all historic tribes, but cannot
investigate and make determinations on historical and genealogical
questions; doing so in the past has led on occasion to intratribal and
intertribal conflict, the resolution says.
In order to avoid those conflicts, NCAI will support federal recognition
for tribes who are co-sponsored by an NCAI member and present their
request for a resolution at an NCAI meeting.
|
Garcia: ‘We’ve got our
marching orders’
Joe Garcia, president of the National Congress
of American Indians, was energized on the last day of NCAI’s 65th
annual conference, which took place at the Phoenix Convention Center
Oct. 19 – 24. He stopped on his way out to chat with Indian Country
Today.
Indian Country Today: What is
your assessment of the 65th annual conference?
Joe Garcia: I thought it was an
awesome setting. I thought it was energizing and that people were
engaged. We did a lot of work. At least 72 resolutions were passed and
all of them high priority. We’ve got our marching orders.
Highlights would be the engagement of our youth commission and that
they’re more fully engaged in becoming part of our process, and that’s
good.
We’ve set our priorities. We’ve got all of our efforts for the
transition for the new administration lined up. It’s a matter now of
once the resolutions are worked on then we move forward. The passage
of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act is still in the works right
now, so if the lame duck session can tackle that, we’re going to be
right on it to keep pushing it.
But there’s so many [issues] to name – education, homeland security,
our boundary protection, violence against women, the National Indian
Child Welfare Act and encouraging our people to be part of that,
suicide prevention, meth prevention, law enforcement, tribal courts.
Everything we’ve been working on for years and years has been part of
this session and it just tells us that those things still have a lot
of needs and we’re going to find resolutions for them.
ICT: What actually happens to the NCAI resolutions? Do you send
them on to Congress?
Garcia: A number of things. The resolution is just a product.
And the product is then worked hard. Those are our marching orders, so
with 72 resolutions we’re better assured that they go to the next
level and the next level. They’ve got to go to the tribes that
presented them, number one.
Number two, they go to the entities that the resolution is about. For
instance, does it go to the Department of Energy, does it go to the
BIA, to the Department of Homeland Security, or whoever.
Then they’ll be distributed to staffers and to key congressional
people who are identified with any particular resolutions and then
distributed to all the tribes.
The resolutions will also be included on our Web site so anybody has
access to them.
They are now our marching orders, so we can be sure when we do see our
congressional people that our tribal leaders have those things in hand
and can say, “Look, this is what this is all about, these are the
specific things, and we do have support from the National Congress,
which is representative of the members tribes across Indian land.”
That’s an important piece. Before, we didn’t have all of that lined
up. We’d get resolutions, but we didn’t know where they went; but now
it’s identified, it’s clear, the process is laid out.
ICT: I noticed that issues in Alaska have come into prominence
during this session.
Garcia: They’ve always been
there, but part of it has to do with how do we resolve those issues,
because they are somewhat different in how you proceed to address
those issues. In the past we’ve been kind of floundering on, OK, it’s
the same issue as an issue in the lower states, but you handle it
differently.
Number one, Alaska is a Public Law 280 state. They’ve got different
land issues. They don’t have trust land, but most people don’t know
these things, and I think in the past we all didn’t know these things
either, so it’s trying to work out something without knowing the
specifics. They don’t own the land. It’s not like being on trust land,
so that’s a big difference and the relationship between the Alaska
tribes and the state government is completely different. So all of
these are critical and crucial positions that we have to know about
and we can address them. The engagement is there and we’re in
full-force support of our Alaska brothers and sisters.
ICT: Do you think there’s a resurgence of Native power
happening?
Garcia: I sense that. I’m a
pusher of that, of change and initiative, but it isn’t happening with
just one person. It’s all the delegates, all the camaraderie and the
teamwork that we have. I think it’s our job to continue to promote
that and not just talk about it, but actually do it, and we’ve been
doing it. The results are obvious. It’s happening and I’m feeling
really good. We’re ready to meet the challenges with the new
administrations and we’re going to go for it. |
• A resolution urging the reversal of President Bush’s interpretation of
“continuing resolution” for funding programs through March 6, 2009.
Congress failed to pass a budget for fiscal year 2009 before Oct. 1, and
instead passed a “continuing resolution” instead that is supposed to fund
government operations until March 6, 2009, at the same level as 2008. But
Bush determined that he could actually slash funding from 2008 levels. The
resolution asks that Bush’s interpretation be reversed and that programs
be funded at the same level as last year.
• A call to reauthorize the Indian Health Care Improvement Act during the
post-election lame duck session of the 110th Congress.
The litigation and governance committee passed almost two dozen
resolutions that were presented by committee Chair John Echohawk, the
executive director of Native American Rights Fund. The resolutions
included:
• A request to the Justice Department to release “meaningful declination
statistics” on the prosecution of crimes reported from Indian country.
This resolution asks Justice to release as soon as possible to Congress
and tribal leaders statistics for the past five years that break down the
declinations into general categories and compare the declinations of cases
in Indian country with declination statistics for other cases provided to
U.S. attorneys to prosecute.
• Approval of the NCAI Transition Plan for the presidential transition
effort following the November election.
The plan provides a broad policy agenda, including issues that need to be
addressed by the incoming administration. It also outlines the process for
selecting qualified people to fill key positions in the new administration
that affect Indian country and tribal citizens.
NCAI is calling for qualified tribal citizens who are interested in
serving in positions from department secretary to staff to send their
resumes to NCAI for review.
• A resolution concerning Public Law 280.
This resolution encourages Congress to hold field hearings on P.L. 280,
the 1950s-era law that imposed state criminal jurisdiction over certain
crimes in Indian country, and supports legislation with appropriate
funding that will enable Indian nations to retrocede, or withdraw, from
all or part of P.L. 280.
Other resolutions from the litigation and governance committee include
support for the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act, with
enhancements to strengthen the sovereignty and safety of American Indian
and Alaska Native women. Others support efforts for a “fair and equitable
settlement” of the Cobell and Nez Perce tribal class action litigation,
and for the fair and equitable settlement of other individual tribal
litigation.
The other committees passed resolutions that:
• Require the Defense Department, Veterans Administration and other
federal agencies to do more to provide for the health care needs of Native
veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, and improve accessibility
and availability of veterans’ health care services in Indian country.
• Support legislation that would require truth-in-labeling for wild rice
sold in or exported from the U.S.
• Call on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to fulfill its
government-to-government consultation obligations regarding activities
affecting bald eagles and golden eagles and their habitats.
• Support a change in the Social Security age of eligibility from 63 to
55, as the life expectancy for American Indians averages 48 years.
• Reaffirm and strengthen the Indian education provisions in the
reauthorization of No Child Left Behind legislation.
• Support the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and
call on the U.S. government to endorse the declaration.
The full set of resolutions will be posted to NCAI’s Web site at
www.ncai.org.
© 1998 - 2008 Indian
Country Today. All Rights Reserved To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.indiancountry.com
|