Yucca Fight Reaffirmed
Sep 22 - Las Vegas Review - Journal
No matter what happens with the embattled director of Nevada's Nuclear
Projects Agency, the state will not give up the fight against Yucca
Mountain, Nevada's senators vowed Thursday.
Sens. Harry Reid and John Ensign insisted the Energy Department's plans for
a nuclear waste repository are still more dead than alive, even as the
department made progress this summer moving it toward construction.
In a conference call with reporters, the senators said they wanted to nip in
the bud any thoughts that the state should abandon its long-held opposition
and seek benefits instead from the federal government to host the site.
"There will be no deal cut," Reid said.
Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., echoed Reid and Ensign in a separate
interview.
Berkley said the nuclear industry and supporters of Yucca Mountain "smell
blood" in the turmoil surrounding the Agency for Nuclear Projects, whose
executive director, Bob Loux, is under fire for giving himself and his staff
unauthorized raises.
Although Berkley said she disapproved of Loux's actions and expected him to
leave the job, "let's not throw out the baby with the bath water" by
altering strategy in the anti-Yucca campaign.
Members of the state's congressional delegation were largely silent in the
days after the disclosure by Loux that he gave himself and other staffers
raises up to 16 percent.
Gov. Jim Gibbons demanded that Loux resign, but the director's fate rests
with a seven-member Commission on Nuclear Projects that oversees his office.
It is not clear when the case will be resolved. A commission meeting that
was set for Tuesday has been canceled because of a failure to post a timely
public notice. Commission chairman Richard Bryan said a new hearing might be
Sept. 29 in Las Vegas.
The pay scandal has sparked discussion in op-ed pages whether the state
should take stock of its battle against Yucca Mountain.
While polls show a majority of Nevadans oppose Yucca Mountain, there are
citizens who believe the massive government project could provide an
economic shot in the arm.
Some others argue the repository is inevitable and the state should protect
its interests rather than battle to the end.
Reid insisted that only a "tiny segment" favors such a plan, and Ensign
added that "there are no benefits to get."
Chuck Muth, a Carson City conservative activist who has written that Nevada
should reconsider its Yucca Mountain stance, said residents "have not gotten
both sides of the story where they can make an intelligent decision" on the
project.
"After 20 years, Nevadans have to look at the chance that it may come here,"
Muth said. "Is Yucca Mountain the best place? Maybe, maybe not. But we are
not going to know if we just say no, no, no in knee-jerk fashion and not get
the facts."
Muth has acknowledged he has received backing from the pro-Yucca Nuclear
Energy Institute, including $5,000 to buy gifts for attendees at a
Conservative Leadership Conference in Las Vegas this week.
State scientists have argued that deadly nuclear particles will escape Yucca
Mountain, contaminate the environment, create a safety hazard and ruin the
tourist-driven economy of Las Vegas, 100 miles southeast of the Mountain.
Those arguments will be weighed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which
last week opened a three- to four-year review period for a Yucca
construction license.
Reid said some of Yucca's "cheerleaders" are leaving Congress, such as Sens.
Pete Domenici, R-N.M., and Larry Craig, R-Idaho, and momentum is building
toward reprocessing the waste instead of disposing it immediately.
Review-Journal writers Keith Rogers and Sean Whaley contributed to this
report. Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at
stetreault@stephensmedia.com or 202-783-1760.
(c) 2008 Las Vegas Review - Journal. Provided by ProQuest
LLC. All rights Reserved. |