| Tulsa put on alert about ozone levels 
    Apr 16 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - Susan Hylton Tulsa World, Okla.
 
 
 This year is the critical year that will determine whether Tulsa County will 
    violate the national standard for ozone and wind up on the "dirty air list," 
    a DEQ official said Wednesday.
 
 The state's two metropolitan counties -- Tulsa and Oklahoma -- already had 
    two monitoring sites exceeding the .075 parts per million ozone standard in 
    2008, records show.
 
 The non-attainment areas will be designated in March 2010, said Scott 
    Thomas, an environmental programs manager for the Oklahoma Department of 
    Environmental Quality. Thomas' statements came during a DEQ Air Quality 
    Advisory Council meeting in Tulsa Wednesday.
 
 The non-attainment determination will be based on averaging three years of 
    data from 2007 through 2009.
 
 Ozone levels in 2007 and 2008 are actually much improved from 2006 ozone 
    levels. Thomas said it was hot with little wind and rain in 2006, which 
    caused the ozone to stick around.
 
 This year so far, ozone levels in Tulsa are in compliance, but the city's 
    "Ozone Alert!" program, which runs May through September, hasn't begun yet.
 
 If the Tulsa or Oklahoma City areas are placed on the EPA's "dirty air 
    list," requirements include the following:
 
 Perform a complete inventory of all sites that contribute to air pollution 
    within two years of designation, and repeat every three years until 
    attainment is reached.
 
 Provide evidence that new roads and bridges or improvements to them do not 
    exacerbate the ozone problem.
 
 New facilities
 
 in the non-attainment area must offset or reduce their emissions.
 
 Attain the federal ozone standard within three years. Two, one-year 
    extensions may be obtained.
 
 Officials do not know how much it would cost Tulsa or Oklahoma City to 
    comply with the requirements.
 
 Pete White, a member of the air quality board and an Oklahoma City 
    councilman, questioned the method of determining non-attainment by measuring 
    what is produced within a geographic area. White leans toward source 
    monitoring.
 
 "My bias is transportation is the main one," he said. "We're so addicted to 
    our transportation."
 
 Thomas said DEQ has a rough idea of ozone sources: a third from 
    transportation, a third from the biogenic emissions of plants, and a third 
    from industrial sources such as refineries and power plants.
 
 Eddie Terrill, division director of DEQ's Air Quality Division, said bigger 
    cities may never be able to reach attainment due to the numerous industrial 
    air pollution sources that are stationary. That's why the EPA is active in 
    promoting cleaner fuels and fuel efficiency, Terrill said.
 
 "It would be easier in Oklahoma City if we had mass transit and people would 
    use it," Terrill said.
 
 One of the repercussions of being on a dirty air list is that cities may 
    have a hard time attracting business.
 
 Thomas said limiting the size of the non-attainment area would be part of 
    the negotiations with the EPA if non-attainment is reached.
 
 Terrill said there's no sense in making large non-attainment areas when a 
    good wind could bring it back into compliance.
 
 In a March 9 letter to EPA's region 6, Gov. Brad Henry indicates he will 
    recommend non-attainment areas be smaller than the EPA's default 
    metropolitan statistical area due to the rural nature of counties bordering 
    the metropolitan areas.
 
 Susan Hylton 581-8381 
    susan.hylton@tulsaworld.com
 
Copyright © 2008 The 
McClatchy Company |