April 9, 2009
Why Are Renewable Energy
Systems for Homeowners Still So Expensive?
Q: Can you explain to me
and the readers why solar panels are so expensive? Why can we not get the
cost of this energy down to US $0.15 per kWh while we're paying off the
equipment? Why are we paying for future production capability today? It is
like the current electricity providers are saying, "Well, your house will
use 12,000 kWh this year so we want our $1,800 now" or worse "give us 20
years up front" as the solar industry does today! If the solar market really
wants to see a green planet then I feel they need to get the green out their
eyes! Can they not see that they can truly make every home owner self
sufficient if they bring their costs in line. It seems as though this
renewable energy game is for the wealthy. If I want my home to be totally
self-sustaining, it would cost me $80,000!
A:
Ian, I am happy to respond to your question since I have
spent my own money on both my net-zero-energy home and my
zero-energy office building — so I am acutely aware of the
costs.
My two-story office building in Arlington, VA was built 11
years ago from the ground-up, and includes R40+ insulation
and double pane argon-filled windows with low-e coatings.
The building uses CFLs and LEDs only along with a ceiling
fan and solar daylight tube. Now these additions added 4%
to the building cost and have already been recouped in
energy savings after the first 5 years.
I also included a ductless heat pump, which is more efficient than a
traditional heat pump and has much better air-quality and less maintenance
(no duct cleaning or sealing). So while the unit cost was 20% more than
the traditional heat pump, the installation costs and energy costs are
lower, and it paid for itself in 4 years. And finally, I have a small wind
turbine and photovoltaics roofing shingles tied to a smart web-enabled
battery bank that added $15,000 in costs and paid for itself in 8 years.
Now and for the last 3 years I have had free electricity. The payback was
lessened because I did not need to buy surge protection and long-duration
back-up for the computers and web/fax/phone — all critical for business.
Note that businesses usually have higher energy rates expressed in
demand charges, peak power and ratchet rates, which accelerate payback. I
find in my business where I counsel commercial, industrial and government
customers on the blends of clean energy options behind their corporate or
facility fence, or on their buildings — I am constantly educating these
consumers to actually read and understand the nuances of their energy
bills. (My 15-year-old daughter understands her cellular bill better than
most facility owners understand their energy bills).
The other challenge is to help customers realize the actual costs
associated with traditional energy systems such as duct cleaning, back-up
power, power quality and surge protection, noise reduction, indoor air
quality including respiratory illnesses and loss of productivity due to
unstable indoor temperatures and poorer light quality.
My home systems were tied to renovation and here again, I focused on
energy efficiency first with double-paned argon-filled windows with low-e
coatings, insulation and thermal barrier paint, CFLs and natural lighting,
and Energy Star appliances. This cut the energy costs in my home by 35%
and have long since paid for themselves (I began this in 1990). This was
also true with my solar water heating system that cost $6,500 installed
(in 1984) but was folded into a second mortgage. It added $11 per month to
my mortgage and saved me $20 per month and is now paid off giving me
totally free hot water. The ground-coupled heat pump I just installed
(during the political convention this summer when they chanted "drill
baby, drill) cost $10,000 more than installing a traditional heat pump,
but should pay for itself in 4.5 years, with much higher quality indoor
air quality and much more stable indoor temperatures. Just these renewable
energy and energy efficiency applications — which were all absolutely cost
effective — reduced my home's energy use by almost two-thirds.
Your question also applied to zero-energy building. For my home I have two
kinds of photovoltaics (polycrystalline and 'peal and stick' modules for
metal-seamed roofs) tied to a large deep-cycle battery bank (with 10-year
warranties). Now the installed cost was $25,000 over time, which I
financed at 8% for 15 years, requiring $238.91 per month compared to my
levelized energy bill (electricity and natural gas) of $202.50. So I am
paying $37 more per month than when I received conventional energy. But I
also do not need surge protection or back-up energy for my home (Arlington
has more than 4 outages per year over one hour). And by the way,
approximately $70 per month is charged to me by both my electric and
natural gas utilities as hook-up and transmission fees including tax
whether I draw in one electron or therm from the electric grid or natural
gas pipeline, or not.
Now I currently have some projects where I have been hired to facilitate
the building of zero-energy buildings, and the $80,000 figure for both
efficiency (including appliances) and renewable energy systems (including
electric and thermal) is a good guide. But at least $60,000 of the
improvements when financed in the mortgage are cash-positive the moment
they are installed and financed. Obviously, the renewable energy additions
for either off-grid buildings or places with time-of-day or true seasonal
energy rates, are absolutely comparable and competitive.
For the rest of us residential owners, if installed and financed with
thought, clean energy power systems are slightly higher than the
traditional energy rates — whose resources are more polluting, less
reliable, and offer poor power quality. So for me, the extra $445 per year
saves me the costs I would normally pay for computer battery units and
diesel-back-up or loss of appliances due to surges or replacing surge
protectors (that my neighbors routinely pay for).
I expect it's dead-even economically if I just attribute these actual
costs - but absolutely a bargain when I consider human health, global
climate, and being a driver of the cleaner technologies for the new green
economy. Aside from seeing my neighbors when they converge upon my home
during power outages, it has been an honor to tour all the interested
groups and individuals at my own buildings and installations to acquaint
them with the many great commercial options available to consumers today.
COMMENTS:
Wow, $80k for your PV? That would be over a 12.3kw system here in CO
(BP175-SMA) and that is over twice what the average home needs here. Perhaps
starting with some conservation and more energy-frugal lifestyle choices is
where you should start...
Oh by the way, after Xcel rebates and the ITC, an AVERAGE net-zero, 5.5kw
system will cost $11,550 here. Over the panel warranty tha will make
200,000kwh so that is $0.05775/kwh - in advance albeit. Additionally,
Boulder County rolled out the ClimateSmart Loan program which is a no-doc,
no appraisal, no credit check loan linked to the property and property tax
collection so for a $75 loan application fee and 1.5% origination that
system is yours! -John Shaw
I found it interesting to note that there was no mention of 'solar
thermal, -specifically solar hot water, in Scott's reply to Ian. Even if
Scott did not use this technology in his home or office building it deserves
mentioning when someone asks a question regarding the economics of renewable
energy solutions.
Solar hot water solutions for residential (and commercial) still to my
knowledge lead all other renewable energy alternatives (other than ground
source heat pumps perhaps) for payback. But this 'ugly cousin' of
photovoltaics still gets little or no exposure (even at REW). Solar Domestic
Hot Water is becoming the status quo for new buildings in some parts of the
world but here in North America we are only just beginning to see the light
(and heat) potential of it. - Ken Schwantje
this is a nice, detailed, clean and correct analysis of how these
efficiencies and other point of use solutions can pay off, BIGTIME, if we
can just get the up-front money. CA passed AB 811 last summer and now if our
cities and counties would just fund the no-risk loans for us, we could ALL
install these types of improvements with no money down, and loans amortized
over 20 years, repayable through the property tax system.
unlike other loans, you do not need to repay the balance if you sell the
property - the loan stays with the equipment on the home or office. the
lender takes a first lien on the property, so there is no risk for the
city/county. and the ratepayer gets to write off the interest, just like
home equity lines.
12 other states are looking at something similar. if we could get feed in
tariffs at the same time, so that WE could be paid fairly for every kWh we
produce and do not use, some of us could actually make a modest profit from
doing the right thing. imagine that! americans, not Big Energy, getting paid
for producing clean power, right where it is needed!
try to get your state to adopt these 2 policies immediately - and to FUND
the loan programs so that we can get our stable, clean, democratic power
infrastructure built where we need it, not in our wilderness! - stop
killin our wilderness
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com
|