| Barnwell nuclear dump ruling pending
Dec 26 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - Sammy Fretwell The State,
Columbia, S.C.
After a six-year legal war over safety at a nuclear waste dump, South
Carolina environmentalists hope a pending court decision will force
stricter disposal practices for the Barnwell County site.
The S.C. Court of Appeals, which heard the case last fall, is expected
to render a decision early next year on the Sierra Club's challenge to
the site's operating permit. The landfill closed to the nation in 2008,
but remains open to bury low-level nuclear waste for South Carolina and
two other states.
If the appeals court sides with the Sierra Club, it could force Chem-Nuclear
to improve the way it buries garbage, which would better prevent leaks
of radioactive material into groundwater, club lawyer Jimmy Chandler
said.
For years, landfill operators have allowed rainwater to fall on open
trenches lined with clay, instead of plastic. Burial vaults also have
holes in them, allowing water to escape.
"We want to make Chem-Nuclear plug these holes and stop the leaks, as is
required by law," Chandler said. "Routinely, this waste leaks out.
According to the state regulations, there is supposed to be a barrier to
prevent that."
Controversial leaks of tritium from the landfill date to at least 1982.
The radioactive material has trickled off site and polluted a creek
about a half-mile below the landfill near the tiny community of Snelling.
No one's drinking water has been polluted, but the landfill is uphill
from a small community that relies on wells. The creek eventually drains
into the Savannah River.
Tritium levels in the creek are 23 times higher than the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency's safe drinking water standard of 20,000
pico curies per liter for tritium. But the levels are within a looser
state standard of 500,000 pico curies per liter, records show. The
highest concentration of radioactive tritium beneath the landfill is
23.3 million pico curies, according to a December 2009 state
environmental report. That's more than 1,000 times higher than the EPA's
safe drinking water standard.
The landfill for years was the only site in the country that took all
types of low-level nuclear waste from every state. Utilities, hospitals
and other generators of low-level atomic waste have sent about 28
million cubic feet of radioactive waste to the site. Low-level
radioactive waste ranges from hospital booties from ex-rays to more
radioactive atomic reactor parts. South Carolina leaders backed the
landfill for years because it generated millions of dollars in revenue
for the state.
Chem-Nuclear's parent company, Energy Solutions, had no immediate
comment on the court case. But officials have said they run a safe
landfill that hasn't caused any health problems for people who live
nearby. They also say they have improved burial practices since the site
opened nearly 39 years ago.
While only South Carolina, Connecticut and New Jersey now use the dump,
Chandler said it remains important to stop future leaks with tougher
disposal requirements. Chandler said he doesn't agree with arguments
that the site is so polluted that it isn't worth worrying about
additional contamination.
"That's saying 'the heck with it, we will sacrifice the whole area in
the Savannah River Basin and just write it off,'" he said.
At issue is a 2004 permit granted by state regulators for Chem-Nuclear
to continue operating the 235-acre site. The landfill opened in 1971,
but no one apparently ever challenged the site's operating permit until
2004. The Sierra Club appealed the state Department of Health and
Environmental Control's decision to issue the permit, then appealed an
Administrative Law Court ruling that upheld the DHEC decision.
During its legal battle, the Sierra Club has been denied records by DHEC
and slowed by technicalities over which court had jurisdiction over the
case. The case was finally heard in the fall of 2009.
The club says DHEC regulators issued the permit in violation of their
own rules. State regulations require adequate barriers at the landfill
to prevent leaks to groundwater, the Sierra Club says. But DHEC didn't
follow those rules when it agreed to issue a new permit for the landfill
in 2004, the club says.
Thom Berry, a spokesman for DHEC, said the agency's decision to issue
the permit was proper.
"We believe the permit was properly issued and is protective of the
environment," Berry said in a written statement. "Since the matter is
still before the court, we will make no other comment on the case or any
of the specifics."
The site is expected to take in about 13,000 cubic feet of waste this
year, Berry said. During its peak years in the 1970s, the Barnwell
County site was taking in more than 2 million cubic feet of waste, DHEC
records show.
Reach Fretwell at (803) 771-8537.
(c) 2009,
McClatchy-Tribune Information Services
|