New climate bill aimed at 'ensuring a future
for coal'
Dec 11 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - Ken Ward Jr. The Charleston
Gazette, W.Va.
The latest version of a U.S. Senate bill to address global warming will
be aimed at "ensuring a future for coal," according to a legislative
framework released Thursday by a bipartisan trio of senators.
Sens. John Kerry, D-Mass.; Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn.; and Lindsey
Graham, R-S.C., said they wanted to announce a starting point for their
discussions. A final bill isn't expected until spring, and they gave few
details so there would be room for further negotiations.
A four-page outline cites recent statements by Sen. Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va.,
that coal will remain a major part of the nation's energy mix, but that
some form of climate change legislation likely will become law.
"We agree with both statements," the new climate framework document
said. "However, due to current regulatory uncertainty, it is
increasingly challenging to site new coal facilities, and utilities are
switching to other fuel sources."
The document noted that one utility in North Carolina announced earlier
this month that it plans to take 11 coal-fired generating units out of
service because of carbon dioxide emissions.
"Coal's future as part of the energy mix is inseparable from the passage
of comprehensive climate change and energy legislation," the document
said. "We will commit significant resources to the rapid development and
deployment of clean-coal technology, and dedicated support for early
deployment of carbon capture and sequestration."
The senators said they hope to propose a near-term greenhouse emissions
reduction "in the range" of 17 percent, equal to that contained in a
bill passed earlier this year by the House.
A current Senate bill proposes a near-term emissions reduction of 20
percent by 2020.
American Electric Power has said it would support the 17 percent cut
contained in the House bill, but other coal industry supporters --
including the United Mine Worker union and Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va.,
-- have said that is too stringent and won't give the industry time to
perfect and deploy carbon-capture and storage equipment on the nation's
power plants.
Also Thursday, Rep. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., announced that she
would be among the Republican members of a bipartisan House delegation
that Speaker Nancy Pelosi, R-Calif., is taking next week to the
climate-change talks in Copenhagen.
Capito said in a statement that she remains "skeptical" that the Obama
administration's goal of a near-term greenhouse emissions cut of 17
percent -- the same figure proposed in the latest Senate outline -- "is
economically viable, particularly at a time of economic distress."
"We all share the goals of a greener energy future, with improved energy
efficiency and a diverse energy portfolio," Capito said. "Yet we also
have an obligation to work towards those goals in a way that doesn't
devastate the economies in the communities we represent. From job losses
to increased energy rates, emissions cuts and a new cap-and-trade regime
are not without serious costs for families across our state."
Previously, Capito has been among the Republicans who have promoted
potential cap-and-trade costs that academic experts whose work they
cited said were being misquoted and exaggerated.
Also, despite a widespread scientific consensus, Capito has said she's
"not convinced" that human-caused emissions of carbon dioxide are
leading to global warming that will alter the planet's climate in ways
that could be dangerous.
"I'm looking at the studies, and trying to understand it," Capito said
earlier this year, "but I'm not convinced that the urgencies or the
doomsday predictions are factual."
Reach Ken Ward Jr. at kward@wvgazette.com or 304-348-1702.
(c) 2009,
McClatchy-Tribune Information Services
|