Obama,
America and Afghanistan
By Joel C. Rosenberg
(WASHINGTON,
D.C., December 2, 2009) -- After months of
hemming, hawing, indecision, and in-fighting
within the White House, President Obama finally
laid out his Afghanistan policy last night.
There was good news, and bad.
Good news:
* The President recognized the vital national
interest the U.S. has in defeating the Taliban,
al Qaeda and the forces of Radical Islam in
Afghanistan and along the Pakistani border, and
committed the U.S. to winning this critical war.
* The President endorsed the very "surge"
strategy in Afghanistan that he so vehemently
opposed in Iraq. He is putting an additional
30,000 U.S. troops into the theater, effectively
doubling our troop strength there.
* The President firmly backed the policy
recommended by Gen. David Petraeus and Gen.
Stanley McChrystal, two men I believe could
truly win this war for us if they are fully
supported and unleashed to get the job done
right and well.
* The President sent our enemies, our allies -
and notably Iran - a message that he won't cut
and run from protecting American national
interests in the battle with Radical Islam.
* In sharp contrast to his presidential campaign
rhetoric, Mr. Obama chose to become a "war
president" - a good thing in a war - against
intense opposition from his left-wing political
base.
Bad news:
* The President undermined the full strength of
his new policy by setting an artificial deadline
of bringing the troops home beginning 18 months
from now, in July 2011. This doesn't give
reassurance to American families that the war
will truly be won by then. Rather, it gives the
Taliban and al Qaeda fighters reassurance that
they can outlast the Americans and live to
terrorize another day.
* The President committed only 30,000 new
troops, when McChrystal requested 40,000. Why
give go only 75% of the way?
* The White House is suggesting that perhaps
NATO will provide another 10,000 troops. That
would be nice. But I'm not holding my breathe.
Bottom Line:
* This is a war we have to win. I have been to
Afghanistan. I have seen how badly we were doing
and have talked to Afghan tribal leaders who
were deeply disappointed by the lack of full
American resolve to defeat the Radicals. So I am
grateful to the Lord that President Obama has
committed his administration and our nation to
doing more to win. I have many deep
disagreements with this President, but I
expected him to cut and run from Afghanistan,
and he didn't. He's making a mistake to set an
artificial deadline to withdraw our troops. But
he has backed the very "surge" policy he
detested in Iraq but which ultimately proved the
right decision. This is a good thing, and we
should give him -- and most importantly our
troops -- our full support.
[Photo: President Obama delivering his address
on Afghanistan last night at West Point.]
More stories on weblog:
* Iran to build 10 new nuclear facilities
* Update on efforts to secure release of IDF
solider Gilad Schalit
* EU selects new "President of Europe"
|
|
LEARN: To track the latest news and trends from Israel and the
epicenter, please click here |