German Environmental Groups Step Up Pressure to Abandon Nuclear Power
Jan 05 - BBC Monitoring
Europea
Environmental organization Greenpeace has demanded to speed up the
projected abandonment of nuclear energy. Greenpeace Managing Director
Brigitte Behrens warned on Sunday [ 4 January] that nuclear energy was "the
most dangerous and most irresponsible method to generate electricity."
Nuclear power had therefore to be abandoned "considerably more quickly than
currently planned." The Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Union of
Germany (NABU) criticized the recent proposals made by the Christian
Democratic Union/Christian Social Union to extend the operating lives of
nuclear power plants.
In an interview with ddp, Behrens demanded that Germany should "disconnect
the last nuclear reactor no later than 2015, rather than 2025." She
stressed: "Some terrible accident like that in Chernobyl is possible any
time." In addition, "the highly radioactive waste left behind by nuclear
power generation must be stored for 10,000 years under absolutely safe
conditions." The Greenpeace director emphasized: "No one knows where and how
that can be done; there is not a single permanent disposal site in place to
date."
Another risk was that no nuclear power plant was sufficiently protected
against terrorist attacks. Behrens also rejected the claim that nuclear
power would make it possible to fight climate change. That view was "simply
wrong."
NABU energy expert Elmar Grusse-Ruse stressed: "Longer operating life cycles
for nuclear power plants not only fail to promote climate protection, they
even obstruct it." It had to be assumed "that nuclear power groups will
reduce or even withdraw their investments in renewable energies at the very
moment the extension of operating lives will be agreed." The reason is that
the existing power grid had "no space" for additional electricity from
renewable sources of energy on a lasting and reliable basis if electricity
generated by nuclear power had to be taken in.
The energy expert added in an interview with ddp: "That would be the end to
the extension plans for offshore wind farms." If the share of renewable
energies was to climb to a minimum of 30 per cent until 2020, it was
necessary to have "highly efficient and, above all, decentralized power
plants that are in a position to respond flexibly to supply and demand in a
region." That excluded large-scale nuclear power plants. They were
associated with huge losses in primary energy and had to be "operated
permanently, because they cannot be powered up and down at short notice."
From NABU's point of view, the "Stone Age technology nuclear power" was
standing in the way of a future-compliant energy policy. In addition, "there
is no prospect of being able to find a safe permanent disposal site for
nuclear waste in Germany."
Originally published by ddp news agency, Berlin, in German 0709 4 Jan 09.
(c) 2009 BBC Monitoring European. Provided by ProQuest
LLC. All rights Reserved. |