| Sulfate in Wastewater Streams a Growing Concern for
the Energy Sector

| 7.2.09 |
|
David
Kratochvil, President and Chief Operating Officer, BioteQ
Environmental Technologies |
New developments in water quality legislation are making it increasingly
important for companies to look to new technologies for treating their feed
and waste water streams. One area of growing interest is the presence of
sulfates.
Sulfates are a form of salt that cause scaling in equipment, resulting in
reduced performance and premature equipment failure. This is a particular
concern in feed water for boiler furnaces and condensers in power generation
facilities. Sulfates can also be present in blow down wastewater from
emissions control systems and ash ponds.
In addition to process water concerns, many jurisdictions are imposing
tighter discharge limits for sulfate because of concerns about the impact on
the surrounding environment, with evidence that the presence of sulfates can
negatively impact crop yields and fertility in livestock. Although not
considered harmful to humans except at very high levels, sulfate imparts a
bitter taste and odor that makes it undesirable for drinking water.
The growing legislative focus on sulfates will have an impact on virtually
all industries -- from power generation to municipal water systems. The
power generation industry in particular will be affected significantly by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's review of effluent guidelines for
the fossil fuel-burning power generation sector.
In addition to effluent regulations, many jurisdictions are imposing tighter
restrictions on water licenses and limiting access to water supplies. As a
result, large industrial users like the power generation sector are
increasingly interested in ways to improve their water recycle ratios and
reduce their overall water consumption.
With the added restrictions, it may very well be that many conventional
wastewater treatment systems will begin to fall short of the mark. Some
operations have been working with membrane technologies with partial
success. But membrane technologies are becoming a less appealing option
because of their high energy consumption and the associated waste generated
by the process.
A newer, much less energy-intensive alternative that can dramatically
decrease energy requirements and increase the amount of water for reuse is
ion exchange technology. This process works quite differently from membranes
by using chemistry to safely breaking down sulfate molecules, leaving
operations with high water recovery rates, as well as a "clean" waste
product that can be reused in other applications.
Sulfate reduction technologies
Prevailing technologies to treat sulfate include reverse osmosis (membrane
systems), processes based on ettringite formation, biological sulfate
reduction, and precipitation with barium.
Typically these technologies are either not able to treat contaminated water
to a level which complies with new regulations and standards that are being
imposed on industry, or they bring either environmental or economic
disadvantages.
For example, membrane systems have been used for treating wastewater streams
in a number of industries, including the energy sector. They operate by
pushing water through a series of micro filters that capture contaminants in
the form of a supersaturated liquid. Once the system collects the residual
liquid, the liquid is then heated to evaporate the water content, producing
a crystalline byproduct that often requires special handling and disposal.
There are several limitations with this approach. First, water recovery
rates can be low because of the complex cocktail of contaminants typically
found in industrial wastewater. It is not uncommon to have up to 50 percent
of the water end up in the waste product stream. Second, membrane processes
can have high energy costs. As with any process that relies on heat, the act
of crystallization also consumes high amounts of energy. In addition, the
cost of handling the brine byproduct and ongoing maintenance -- including
membrane replacement -- can be extremely high.
Other techniques pose their own unique challenges. For example, processes
based on ettringite formation have not been commercially proven, with
limited effectiveness and high cost. Biological sulfate reduction requires a
large input of energy to raise the temperature of feed water, and generates
a residual waste that can be toxic. Passive biological systems leave a large
environmental footprint, and are suitable for only small flows of water.
Ion exchange
Ion exchange uses an entirely different process, using chemistry to remove
sulfate from water. In the first stage, feed water is passed through a
series of contactors containing cation exchange resin to remove calcium and
magnesium by loading the cations onto the resin, and then through contactors
containing anion exchange resin to remove sulfate. In the second stage, the
resins are regenerated using the low-cost reagents, sulfuric acid and lime,
so that the only products of the process are a solid gypsum product and
clean water that can be re-used or safely discharged. There are no residual
wastes that require special disposal or ongoing management.
Utilities can realize a number of environmental and economic advantages with
ion exchange treatment. It usually requires no pre-treatment and there is no
residual brine waste that would otherwise require special disposal. The
process also consumes 90 percent less energy than a similar capacity
membrane system and has been shown to achieve water recovery rates of up to
95 percent. Depending on the operation and its water treatment needs, ion
exchange technology can reduce operating and capital costs for water
treatment by at least half.
For power generation facilities, this new water treatment process can
improve the rate of water recycle and re-use, and in doing so, facilities
can reduce the quantity of water required for make-up feed, and improve the
quality of water discharged to the environment. By reducing water
consumption, the process can help facilities meet zero-discharge limits. In
addition, facilities can prevent scaling and corrosion by treating feed
water, reducing their equipment maintenance costs.
With the current government's renewed focus on the environment, the energy
sector has an opportunity to break new ground in waste water treatment and
reuse. There is no question that all industries need to explore technologies
that can effectively handle contaminants such as sulfates, while preserving
the integrity of the water supplies for the communities they serve.

Copyright © 2002-2006,
CyberTech, Inc. - All rights reserved.
|