US States Anxious As Obama Shapes Climate Policy -
ANALYSIS -
Date: 23-Mar-09
Country: US
Author: Peter Henderson and Timothy Gardner
ANALYSIS - US States Anxious As Obama Shapes Climate Policy Photo: Lucy
Nicholson
Century City and downtown Los Angeles are seen through the smog in this file
photo from December 31, 2007.
Photo: Lucy Nicholson
SAN FRANCISCO/NEW YORK - US states have spearheaded moves to curb global
warming and are not ready to pass the leadership baton to President Barack
Obama.
Regional markets to trade air pollution credits, aimed at cutting emissions
that heat the planet, could be overshadowed by a federal system Obama sees
as central to his environmental policy.
But states plan to proceed with their own emission control programs until
the White House and Congress pass a credible federal market mechanism such
as "cap-and-trade" to meet Obama's targets for greenhouse gas cuts.
State officials say the federal program might never happen, or be too weak
to help reduce the chances of catastrophic droughts, floods and heat waves
from global warming.
"There is no guarantee that this federal program will in fact come into
existence," said the California Environmental Protection Agency's Michael
Gibbs.
"We need to continue to press ahead," said Gibbs, the top state official
working in the Western Climate Initiative, a group of 11 US states and
Canadian provinces that plan to start trading in 2012.
Ten Eastern US states in January set emissions limits that get tougher over
time. The program requires power companies to obtain permits to pollute and
allows them to sell excess permits to companies that lag their own targets.
This system is designed to push companies to conserve energy or switch to
cleaner fuels such as natural gas.
New York is the biggest polluter in the group known as the Regional
Greenhouse Gas Initiative. The state's Climate Change Director Peter
Iwanowitz said he welcomed federal action as long as New York had room to be
tougher and experiment.
"We would always want the option to sort of break off and do it ourselves,"
he said.
Obama wants to cut carbon emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and 80 percent
below that by 2050, which is in line with California's goal and
international plans.
Leaders in Congress want to introduce a climate bill this year, but interest
groups already are lining up to soften the targets or to prevent a plan from
going forward.
Industry also is wary of inconsistency. "It ought to be passed at the
federal level and not have a patchwork of regulation at the state level,"
said Duke Energy Corp spokesman Tom Williams.
INNOVATION LABS
The devil is in the details. The regions differ on specific reduction
targets, how many greenhouses gases they track and whether to regulate
transportation as well as industry.
Some systems give credits for cutting pollution outside the region -- by
saving endangered rainforest, for example -- while others limit such
so-called offsets. And the Western plan includes Canadian, and potentially
Mexican, provincial and state governments.
The Western group may give away a substantial number of credits to
polluters. The Eastern plan's biggest gift to global carbon markets has been
proving that polluters, speculators and environmentalists will buy tradebale
permits in auctions. The revenues can help customers deal with costs of
carbon regulation.
RGGI auctions off permits every quarter and so far the first three auctions
have raised $263 million for the states.
Obama's budget plans said national auctions could raise $646 billion from
2012 to 2019 and fund clean energy investments and tax cuts.
AMBITIOUS STATES
Allowing states to set more stringent standards than the federal system
would not be simple. Without adjustment to the system, a California power
producer that meets tough state efficiency standards could simply sell
unneeded credits out of state -- so total US carbon output would not be
affected.
Environmentalists say one plan would be for states to set local premiums --
requiring companies to buy 1.1 tons of federal credit for every ton of
pollution allowance needed.
Dereck Walker, director of Environmental Defense's California Climate Change
office, said there are no unmanageable state-federal conflicts. But he
added, "Let's not be naive. Congress is going to want to put their strong
stamp on federal policy ... they don't want to just take things at the state
level."
Derek Murrow, the director of policy analysis at Environment Northeast, said
the tougher the federal plan, the more likely Washington will argue that it
preempts the states.
"But that doesn't mean states will be willing to give up the role to be
laboratories for innovation," he said.
(Reporting by Peter Henderson and Timothy Gardner; Editing by David
Gregorio)
© Thomson Reuters 2009 All rights reserved

|