Hydropower not in new energy bill
Apr 24 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - Marc Heller Watertown Daily
Times, N.Y.
As Congress considers ways to boost renewable energy, one big source in
Northern New York -- the St. Lawrence-FDR Power Project in Massena -- does
not count.
Lawmakers are closing in on legislation that would largely leave out
hydroelectric production as a renewable energy source, a move that would
encourage less-established sources such as wind or solar but give New York
and other states a steeper climb to meet new federal standards.
About 19 percent of New York's electricity comes from hydroelectric plants,
Gov. David A. Paterson's office reported. Hydro accounts for a big share of
the renewable energy in the state, perhaps as much as 90 percent, proponents
say.
"It's a renewable resource," said Jeffrey Leahey, senior manager of
government affairs for the National Hydropower Association, which is
pressing as big a role as possible for hydro in the mix of alternative
energy the federal government is seeking. "Frankly, that balance can be
difficult."
Excluding hydro from the standard will drive up the cost of electricity in
the state, say critics of the legislation drafted in the Senate and House.
Committees could vote on the bills in the next few weeks, setting up debates
this summer on a final package. The House Energy and Commerce Committee is
holding hearings this week on the legislation, which attacks climate change
and energy.
The bills' defenders say the point is to encourage a wider range of
electricity sources, and including existing hydro production detracts from
the goal.
But Congress does give hydro plants a nod by letting officials exclude those
plants' production in a state's "base" of electric production to meet the
new standard; a smaller base means a state does not have to generate as much
power from alternative sources to meet the new standard, which is 20 percent
renewable in the Senate bill and 25 percent renewable in the House version.
And new hydro plants could be counted toward the standard. Another question,
Mr. Leahey said, is how lawmakers will treat existing dams that do not
generate electricity. If hydroelectric plants could be added, he said, that
would help states meet the standard.
The New York Power Authority, which operates the St. Lawrence-FDR project as
well as the Niagara Power Project, has not lobbied heavily on the issue in
Washington but has invested heavily at those facilities in recent years in
advance of federal relicensing.
The Power Authority spent $254 million upgrading the St. Lawrence project,
which obtained a new 50-year license in 2003.
Depending on the outcome of legislation, the new renewable electricity
standard could be in place by 2025. However, skeptics in Congress say that
timetable may be too fast for states to meet.
The legislation reflects Democrats' efforts to act quickly on global warming
and on President Obama's pledge to reduce the nation's reliance on fossil
fuels and imported oil. Republican critics say the reductions are too
costly.
Rep. John M. McHugh, R-Pierrepont Manor, is waiting for a bill to come into
better focus before taking a position, said his spokeswoman, Stephanie
Valle.
Mr. Paterson's office is making the case to lawmakers that the proposed
federal standard and the state's own renewable energy standard should match
as closely as possible.
On the hydro issue, they do not; New York counts existing hydro toward its
renewable portfolio standard of 25 percent.
(c) 2009,
McClatchy-Tribune Information Services |