Peak oil guru Simmons wants G20 to lead data
transparency drive
Denver (Platts)--13Oct2009/210 am EDT/610 GMT
One of the founding fathers of the peak oil movement, Matthew
Simmons, renewed his call Monday for greater data transparency to
help prove or disprove peak oil theories.
In his keynote address to the annual meeting of the US
Association for the Study of Peak Oil, Simmons said the G-20 group
of nations should be the tool for obtaining accurate data from
producing nations. Under Simmons' plan, the G-20 would set up an
auditing system to verify flows from the world's major producers.
But Simmons did not spell out details on how the G-20 would
go about obtaining this data.
The G-20 group comprises the world's top two oil
producers--Saudi Arabia and Russia, and the top five oil
consumers--USA, China, Japan, India and South Korea.
The enforcement mechanism for those countries that refuse
to comply would be a "transparency fine" of $20 to $40 per barrel
for any oil imported into a member of the G-20 group. At the very
least, he said, such a fine would create a "giant rainy day fund."
Such an audit "would prove or disprove the peak oil
theory," according to Simmons, who has stepped down from day-to-day
management of investment banking firm Simmons & Co. and now has the
title of chairman emeritus.
The audit would create "an accurate data base to track
likely future flows, and it would probably be pretty ugly," he said,
implying that the data would support his long-held view that the
world's crude oil flows peaked in 2005.
Though total petroleum liquids supplies have continued to
rise, this has been supported by increased output of biofuels and
LPGs. Simmons' speech touched on his standard review of declining
flows around the world, with almost no forecasts even slightly
optimistic.
He also said world gas output has peaked as well, later
dismissing increasing optimism about shale gas supplies as "hype
beyond anything I've ever seen."
US government estimates about the potential of the shale
oil and gas Bakken formation in North Dakota and Montana overlook
the rapid declines in output that operators are telling him they
encounter with new wells, Simmons said.
Output from Mexico's Cantarell field, most recently
reported at about 500,000 b/d, will be down to 400,000 b/d by the
end of the year, and Mexico will probably cease exports to US Gulf
Coast refiners by the end of next year, Simmons said.
He also took the occasion to rip into analysts critical of
peak oil theory, specifically citing what he called a gang of four:
Amy Myers Jaffe of Rice University's Baker Institute; Michael Lynch
of EnergySEER; Edward Morse, formerly of Lehman Brothers but more
recently with Louis Capital Markets; and Daniel Yergin, chairman of
IHS CERA.
"We've used up a lot of lumber producing the papers of
optimists writing how stupid peak oil is," Simmons said. "These
optimists abound in simple beliefs that energy resource endowments
are boundless; that advancing technology makes new energy finds
easy; that massive new finds are cropping up everywhere; and that
shale oil and shale gas will provide a bridge to the 22nd century."
Although Simmons is widely quoted in the media, he said the
so-called optimists are "winning the media battle."
--John Kingston, john_kingston@platts.com