US Senate bill's emission allocations mirror House
plan
Washington (Platts)--26Oct2009/1009 am EDT/1409 GMT
US Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman Barbara
Boxer late Friday released a revised version of a climate change bill
that would largely mirror free emission allowance allocations contained
in legislation approved in late June by the House of Representatives.
The measure released Friday fills in a number of blanks left
open when Boxer, a California Democrat, and John Kerry, a Massachusetts
Democrat, introduced their so-called Clean Energy Jobs and American
Power Act (S. 1733) on September 30.
Boxer's committee is scheduled to begin three straight days of
hearings on the bill Tuesday and may begin voting on the measure as
early as next week with a goal of passing a bill by the Thanksgiving Day
holiday.
In a statement released Friday night, Boxer called her offering
"another milestone as we move to a clean energy future, creating
millions of jobs and protecting our children from dangerous pollution."
The Senate bill would require the US to cut greenhouse gas emissions, or
GHG emissions, 20% below 2005 levels by 2020, tougher than the House
target of a 17% cut by 2020. Both measures call for an 83% cut in GHG
below 2005 levels by 2050.
Boxer, as she had promised earlier, stayed close to the House
language in deciding how free emission allowances would be distributed.
According to bill language released on Friday, the revised
Senate bill would give away 35% of total allowances created under a
cap-and-trade program to the electric power sector, with 30% of total
allowances going to regulated electric utilities. Merchant coal
generators and other independent power producers would receive 5% of
total allowances. The free allowances would begin to phase out starting
in 2026 and end entirely after 2030.
The Senate measure also mirrors House provisions that would
provide 0.5% of total allowances to local distribution utilities,
including rural electric cooperatives.
In addition, the revised Senate bill would grant regulated
natural gas distribution utilities 9% of allowances -- identical to the
House bill -- while home heating oil and propane consumers would receive
1.5%.
The Senate bill again followed the House's lead in providing
free allowances to energy-intensive industries, which lawmakers worry
would be put at a competitive disadvantage under a cap-and-trade
program. The Senate measure, like the House bill, would provide 4% of
all allowances to steel, cement and aluminum makers, in 2012 and 2013.
The percentage of free allowances would then increase to 15% in 2014 and
2015, before declining.
Oil refiners would receive 2.25% of the bill's allowances
starting in 2014 and ending in 2026 under the Senate bill, unchanged
from the House proposal.
Further, the Senate bill would give away allowances to help
utilities install carbon capture and sequestration technologies, help
states fund energy efficiency and renewable energy projects and conduct
energy research and development the federal level.
Both House and Senate bills would set aside a portion of
allowances to establish a reserve pool of allowances that would be made
available if allowance price rises high enough. The House bill would
place 2.7 billion allowances in the strategic reserve representing 2.1%
of total allowances, while the Senate measure would put 3.5 billion
allowances in a market stability reserve, representing 2.7% of total
allowances.
The House bill sets the minimum reserve price of $28 (in
constant 2009 dollars) in 2012 and that price would rise at a real rate
of 5% through 2014. Starting in 2015, the minimum reserve price would be
set at a rate of 60% above a 36-month rolling average of that year's
emission allowance. The Senate bill sets the minimum reserve price at
$28 (in 2005 dollars) in 2012, rising at a real rate of 5% through 2017,
then rising at a real rate of 7% thereafter.
--Jean Chemnick, jean_chemnick@platts.com
|