Why You Should Say No to GMOs
(NaturalNews) Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are the latest
travesty thrust upon an unsuspecting public by the greedy, control
minded corporations that see the Almighty Sign ($$) as the ultimate in
achieving the highest "bottom line" possible. If you control the food
supply you control the people. If you control the people, then
ultimately they will work for you and their money is yours.
Did you know...if seeds from a GMO field blow over to a non-GMO field
the non-GMO farmer can be sued for theft?
Did you know...normally, a farmer holds seeds to be used for the next
season? But Monsanto,
who must be hurting for money, makes GMO
farmers buy new
seeds every year?
Did you know... if you ever wondered why GMO
foods are not
labeled as such it is because Monsanto paid off whoever to make sure
that GMO foods do NOT
get labeled as such? Do you think they did that because they knew that
no one would buy them if they were labeled?
Did you know... research was done that showed when GMO and
non-GMO foods are
put in the wild the animals will not eat the GMO
food? One would think
we would learn from that.
Did you know...one would ask why GMO foods are so readily accepted by
the Fraud and Drug Administration? Wonder if Monsanto`s former top
executives having key positions in the FDA have anything to do with
that?
Did you know... since 1996 Americans have been eating genetically
modified ingredients in most processed foods?
Did you know... GM plants, such as soybean,
corn, cottonseed,
canola (what`s a canola?) and now
sugar beets
have had foreign genes
forced into their DNA
and the inserted genes come from
bacteria and
viruses that have never been in the human
food supply?
Did you know... GMOs
have been linked to thousands of toxic and
allergic
reactions, thousands of sick, sterile and dead livestock, and damage
to virtually every organ and system studied in lab animals?
In 1992, the Fraud and Drug Administration claimed that they had no
information showing that
GM foods were
substantially different from conventionally grown foods and therefore
were safe to eat. But, internal memos made public by a lawsuit reveal
that their position was staged by political appointees under orders from
the White House to promote GMOs.
FDA scientists, on the other hand, warned that GMOs can create
unpredictable, hard-to-detect side effects, including
allergies,
toxins, new diseases, and nutritional problems. They urged long-term
safety studies, but were ignored. Why? Because the Fraud and Drug
Administration does not require any safety evaluations for GMOs.
Instead, biotech companies, who have been found guilty of hiding the
toxic effects of their chemical products, are now in charge of
determining whether their GM foods are safe. The FDA official in charge
of creating this policy was Michael Taylor, Monsanto`s former attorney
and later vice-president.
Although these biotech companies participate in a voluntary consultation
process with the FDA, it is a meaningless exercise. The summaries of the
superficial research they submit cannot identify most of the
health risks of
GMOs. In contrast to the statements of biotech advocates,
FDA scientists
and others affirm that genetic modification is not just an extension of
the conventional breeding techniques that have been used by farmers for
lifetimes. Genetic engineering transfers genes across natural species
barriers, using imprecise laboratory techniques that bear no resemblance
to natural breeding. Furthermore, the technology is based on outdated
concepts of how genes and cells work.
Gene insertion is done either by shooting genes from a gene gun into a
plate of cells or by using bacteria to invade the cell with foreign DNA.
The altered cell is then cloned into a plant. These processes create
massive collateral damage, causing mutations in hundreds or thousands of
locations throughout the plant`s DNA.
Natural genes can be deleted or permanently turned on or off, and
hundreds may change their levels of expression. In addition, the
inserted gene is often rearranged, may transfer from the food into our
body`s cells or into the DNA of bacteria inside us, and the GM protein
produced by the gene may have unintended properties or effects.
The primary reason companies genetically engineer plants is to make them
tolerant to their brand of
herbicide and
pesticide. The four major GM plants,
soy, corn, canola, and
cotton and now, sugar beets, are designed to survive an otherwise deadly
dose of weed killer. These
crops have much
higher residues of toxic herbicides.
Basically, Monsanto created GMOs to withstand enormous amounts of their
cash crop, Roundup
*(see end of article for some interesting bits about Roundup). The
second GM trait is a built-in pesticide. A gene from the soil bacterium
called Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) is inserted into cotton and corn DNA,
where it secretes the insect-killing Bt-toxin in every cell. About 19%
of GM crops produce their own pesticide. Another 13% produce a pesticide
and are herbicide, pesticide tolerant.
Also, small amounts of zucchini, and yellow crookneck squash as well as
Hawaiian papaya are engineered to resist plant
viruses. In fact,
virtually all Hawaiian papaya is genetically modified.
Now, let`s take a look at some of the evidence of harm from GMOs: Soy
allergies skyrocketed by 50% in the UK, soon after GM soy was
introduced. A human subject showed a skin prick allergic-type reaction
to GM soy, but not to natural soy. The level of one known soy allergen
is as much as 7-times higher in cooked GM soy compared to non-GM soy. GM
soy also contains an unexpected allergen-type protein not found in
natural soy.
The biotech industry claims that the Bt-toxin found in corn and cotton
is harmless to humans and mammals because the natural bacteria version
has been used as a spray by farmers for years. In reality, hundreds of
people exposed to Bt spray had allergic-type symptoms and mice fed Bt
had powerful immune responses and damaged intestines. Bt in GM crops is
designed to be more toxic than the natural spray and is thousands of
times more concentrated. Hundreds of laborers in India report allergic
reactions just from handling Bt cotton and their symptoms are identical
to those exposed to Bt spray.
No tests can guarantee that a GMO will not cause allergies. Although the
World Health Organization recommends a protein screening protocol, the
GM soy, corn, and papaya in our food supply fail these tests because
they have properties of known allergens. If
proteins digest
slowly, there is more time for allergic reactions. Because GM soy
reduces digestive enzymes in mice, it may slow protein digestion and
promote allergies to many foods.
Mice not only reacted to Bt-toxin, they had immune responses to formerly
harmless compounds. Similarly, a mouse test indicated that people eating
GM peas could develop allergies to the peas and to a range of other
foods. The peas had already passed all the allergy tests normally used
to get GMOs on the market. It took this advanced mouse test, which was
never used on the GMOs we eat, to discover that the peas could be
deadly.
Rats fed GM potatoes
had smaller, partially atrophied livers. The livers of rats fed GM
canola were 12-16% heavier. GM soy altered mouse liver cells in ways
that suggest a toxic insult. The changes reversed after their diet
switched to non-GM soy. More than half the offspring of mother rats fed
GM soy died within three weeks and male rats and mice fed GM soy showed
changes in their testicles; the mice had altered young sperm cells. The
DNA of mouse embryos whose parents ate GM soy functioned differently
than those whose parents ate non-GM soy and the stomach lining of rats
fed GM potatoes showed excessive cell growth, a condition that may be a
precursor to cancer. Rats also had damaged organs and immune systems.
When sheep grazed on Bt cotton plants after harvest, within a week 1 in
4 died. Farmers in Europe and Asia say that cows, water buffaloes,
chickens and horses died from eating Bt corn varieties. About two dozen
US farmers report that Bt corn varieties caused widespread sterility in
pigs and cows. On the human side, Filipinos in at least five villages
fell sick when a nearby Bt corn variety was pollinating.
Unlike safety evaluations for drugs, there are no human clinical trials
of GM foods. The only published human feeding experiment verified that
genetic material inserted into GM soy transfers into the DNA of
intestinal bacteria and continues to function. This means that long
after we stop eating GM foods, we may still have their GM proteins
continuously inside us. This means that if the
antibiotic gene
inserted into most GM crops were to transfer, it could create super
diseases resistant to antibiotics and if the gene that creates Bt-toxin
in GM corn were to transfer, it might turn our intestinal flora into
living pesticide factories - especially since animal studies have shown
that DNA in food can travel into organs throughout the body, even into
fetuses.
In the 1980`s, a contaminated brand of a food supplement called
L-tryptophan killed 100 Americans and caused sickness and disability in
another 5,000 to 10,000 people. The source of the contaminants was
almost certainly the
genetic
engineering process used in its production. The
disease took years
to find and was almost overlooked. It was only because the symptoms were
unique, acute, and fast-acting. If all three characteristics were not in
place, the deadly GM supplement might never have been identified or
removed.
If GM foods on the market are causing common diseases or if their
effects appear only after long-term exposure, we may not be able to
identify the source of the problem for decades, if at all. There is no
monitoring of GMO-related problems and no long-term animal studies. The
bottom line is that these heavily invested biotech
corporations
are gambling away the health of our world for profit.
One last note:
Scientists generally believe that they can do things better than God can
and that God is limited in what he can do for mankind, especially since
our population is growing in leaps and bounds and our resources are
dwindling just as fast. Maybe if we all lived simply and we all saw
ourselves as caretakers, we would be more respectful of the world and
its inhabitants and could put into a much clearer perspective whose
property we were taking care of. After all, it was here before we got
here and it will be here after we are gone. If we could all see this,
there would certainly be no more wars because we would all be sharing
and trading with each other the resources abundant in our part of the
world. It is only due to envy that we wage war. When someone else has
what we want and we have the bigger and better weapons or the greater
force, we go and try to take it. If God is the Owner and we are the
caretakers and if we, His children, are all brothers and sisters, what
would be the need for force?
*
Used in yards, farms and parks throughout thee world, Roundup has long
been a top-selling weed killer. But now, according to an article in
Environmental Health News, written by Crystal Gammon, researchers have
found that one of Roundup`s inert ingredients can kill human cells,
particularly embryonic, placental and umbilical cord cells. Pesticide
researchers and activists from the U.S. to Argentina, Japan and Croatia
have been calling for public access to, and warnings about inerts
(almost 4,000 solvents, surfactants and other chemicals included in
pesticides,
approved by the U.S. EPA, yet not specified on warning labels because
they are not the active ingredient aimed at pest control).
Glyphosate, Roundup`s active ingredient, is the most widely used
herbicide in the U.S. About 100 million pounds are applied to U.S. Farms
and lawns every year. Until now, most health studies have focused on the
safety of glyphosate alone, rather than the mixture of ingredients found
in Roundup. In a study from Caen University, in France, first published
earlier this year, scientists found that Roundup`s inert ingredients
amplified the toxic effect on human cells, even at concentrations much
more diluted than those used on farms and lawns. Their focus was on POEA,
a detergent in Roundup that they were astonished to discover was far
more dangerous than the herbicide itself. The proprietary mixtures
available on the market could cause cell damage and even death at the
residual levels found on Roundup-treated crops, such as soybeans,
alfalfa and corn, or lawns and gardens.
Despite Monsanto`s claims that the study is flawed, Giles-Eric Seralini,
the molecular biologist that headed the French study, says that standard
toxicological methods were used and that competitors can discover what
is in formulations like Roundup with routine lab analysis. The purpose
of the proprietary protection laws for inerts is solely for the purpose
of keeping information from the public. And what`s worse is that when
mixed together at concentrations officially considered "safe", ten of
the world`s most widely used pesticides can combine to produce a
chemical cocktail that is deadlier than any of the chemicals acting
alone.
This is why you MUST say no to GMOs!
Aloha!
Natural News Network © 2009 All Rights Reserved
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.naturalnews.com |