Congressional hearing held at Grand Canyon
By Patrick Whitehurst, Special to the Observer
Patrick Whitehurst/NHO
A number of conservation groups, members of the Havasupai and Hualapi
tribes, National Park Service officials and others attended a
congressional hearing on April 8 to discuss the effects of uranium
mining in the area.Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Shrine of Ages hearing focuses on potential uranium
mining implications
GRAND CANYON, Ariz. - A number of conservation groups, members of the
Havasupai and Hualapi tribes, National Park Service officials, and
others filled the Shrine of Ages for a congressional hearing on April 8
to discuss the effects of uranium mining in the area, as well as other
topics. Groups in attendance for the meeting included the Sierra Club,
the Grand Canyon Trust, the National Parks Conservation Association and
more. Reps. Raul Grijalva, Tom McClintock, Grace Napolitano and John
Shaddeg were on hand for the hearing. Grijalva recently introduced
legislation that would formally withdraw more than 1 million acres of
land around the Grand Canyon from new uranium mining claims.
Carletta Tilousi, a member of the Havasupai Tribe, was one of the many
speakers present for the hearing.
"Within our reservation boundaries of 185,000 acres, the Havasupai is
one of the only tribes in the country that has added in to our
constitution for no uranium mining, or exploration or any development of
any kind," Tilousi said. "Within our boundaries we do not have any type
of uranium activity. The closest uranium activity that's currently
happening right now is 13 miles from us."
The proximity to the mining, however, has raised concerns for the
tribe, she said, in that heavy winds can often pass through the area in
question and carry to the reservation. She said that tribal officials
are also concerned that the mining could conceivably contaminate their
water supply, though she added that she currently had no data to support
those concerns.
"The thing with uranium is you cannot, see it, smell it, or touch it or
hear it come," Tilousi said. "We have experienced an increase in
cancer."
Roger Clark, the air and energy director for Grand Canyon Trust, said
the hearing highlighted both the economic and human implications of
uranium mining at the Grand Canyon.
"This is the fourth hearing on the uranium bill on the Grand Canyon
Watershed Protection Act and I think that portion of the hearing brought
to a head people's understanding of, not only the economic implications,
but also the human implications with the Native American presence,"
Clark said. "The economic implications, I think, pretty much showed that
the industry feels that it has a right to move into the landscape around
the Grand Canyon and mine out all the uranium. We feel that it's not in
the economic best interest of our region given the sustaining basis of
tourism, the industrialization of the watershed isn't in our best
interest."
He added that the recent hearing also highlighted the broad support for
uranium withdrawal from various organizations and individuals in the
southwest.
"We had representatives, at least in the room, from five different
tribes in the region and we heard testimony from two," Clark said. "We
had the Sierra Club, National Park Conservation, and the Center for
Biological, three national organizations there in the room. We had the
Grand Canyon Trust, which is a regional organization. We had people in
the boating industry, from recreational tourism in the room, it was just
a good turnout of local and regional leaders."
Clark said he plans to return to Washington, D.C. where he hopes to
continue progress on the watershed protection act.
"I work a lot on the uranium issues so my hope is that we go ahead and
get the Grand Canyon Watershed Protection Act out of the house. We'll be
headed back to D.C. with some of our Havasupai friends fairly soon to
reinforce that message with Congress," Clark said. "We're trying to
build support in the Senate. So far McCain and Kyl have been
unresponsive to our requests, so we may need to go elsewhere to get a
sponsor."
In 2009, Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar segregated roughly 1
million acres of land in the Arizona Strip for a two-year "timeout" from
new mining claims in order to give the department time to look into the
effects on uranium mining on the Grand Canyon area's natural resources.
Their findings could lead to the withdrawal of the land from new mining
claims for 20 years. A U.S. Geological Survey report evaluating uranium
resources can be found online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5025/.
While Salazar's current withdrawal is scheduled to last two years, the
legislation is seeking a more permanent resolution.
"It's a little confusing, because there is this administrative
withdrawal and moratorium that the Secretary of Interior ordered last
year. There is a two-year administrative process on that administrative
withdrawal, but that would be a withdrawal of 20 years. The legislation
is a separate, but related activity, that's in Congress that would
provide a more permanent withdrawal," Clark said.
Software © 1998-2010
1up! Software, All Rights Reserved To subscribe
or visit go to:
http://navajohopiobserver.com |