Law bars homeowner from installing solar panels on
pier
Apr 16 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - Timothy B. Wheeler The
Baltimore Sun
Maryland is so eager for its residents to try solar power that it offers
homeowners thousands of dollars in grants to mount photovoltaic panels
on or around their homes to generate electricity from the sun.
Just don't try to put them on your boat pier.
That's what Robert Bruninga found out when he proposed putting PV panels
on a wooden pier jutting out into Marley Creek in Glen Burnie. An
engineer at the Naval Academy in Annapolis, Bruninga says he needs to
use his pier because there are too many trees elsewhere on his property
to get a steady dose of the sun's energy-producing rays.
His solar-pier plan passed muster with federal and local regulators, he
says, but got a cold reception from the Maryland Department of the
Environment. The department rejected his application for the wetland
permit he needs to construct the pier, saying solar panels are not
"water-dependent."
The state's rejection was a shock to Bruninga, 62, who calls
himself a "born-again solar-power junkie." He drives a plug-in Prius
with custom-built solar panels mounted on the roof, which he estimates
boosts the hybrid's gas-sipping mileage by another 10 percent.
He's eager to take advantage of what he says are growing financial
incentives to install solar energy at home. He had hoped to mount 8
kilowatts' worth of photovoltaic panels on his property -- enough on
sunny days to offset the electricity he buys from Baltimore Gas and
Electric.
Pointing north across the creek to the plume of steam rising from BGE's
Brandon Shores coal-burning plant, Bruninga said he figures his
household's energy consumption is responsible for 22,000 pounds of
climate-warming carbon dioxide going into the air, plus other
pollutants.
"Why can't I eliminate my contribution?" he asked. He originally planned
to mount the solar panels on the roof of his 100-year-old house, but the
tall oaks and poplars around it shade it from the sun too often to
generate much power. Indeed, the trees cast shadows across all but a
scrap of his one-acre lot. For now, he has 12 solar panels -- a third of
what he needs -- mounted in that one sunny spot in his yard, feeding
electricity to his hot-water heater.
Bruninga said he wants to build a standard 100-foot pier and lay solar
panels end to end along its deck. He's also thinking about building a
solar-powered boat to tie up at the pier. State officials told him
they'd approve the pier, just not the solar panels, he said.
"Our regulations do not permit nonwater-dependent structures on piers,"
said Jay Apperson, a spokesman for the department. The rules are
written, he explained, to keep people from building houses, restaurants
or other structures out over the water that might do environmental harm.
The structures themselves can shade the water from sunlight, preventing
the growth of underwater grasses that provide fish habitat.
"Apparently, my pier and riparian rights only allow me to have a pier to
access a gas-burning, oil-leaking, energy-consuming, noise-generating,
bay-polluting, air-fouling, fossil-fuel stink-pot boat," Bruninga wrote
in an e-mail. "But putting clean-energy-generating solar panels on a
pier ... [is] not allowed."
Brad Heavner, state director of Environment Maryland, called the state's
ban on solar facilities on piers "ridiculous."
"A pier seems like as good a place as a backyard or a rooftop to
generate electricity," Heavner said. "Solar panels have such a positive
public benefit that we should be looking to put them in places like
piers, and every nook and cranny that doesn't get in the way."
Apperson said state environmental officials, who are charged with
shrinking Maryland's carbon footprint, sympathize with Bruninga's cause,
but for now there's nothing else they can do.
"We obviously want to encourage renewable energy, and we appreciate Mr.
Bruninga's interest in this sort of green initiative," the MDE spokesman
said. "We're reviewing the regulations that might constrain that type of
project, but obviously we have to follow the regulations."
Bruninga said he doesn't blame the bureaucrats. They're just following
an outdated law, he said.
"I would not want to see my neighbor put a god-awful array on his pier,"
he said. But he added that what he plans would be unobtrusive the state
ought to let a little sun shine on its ban on nonwater-dependent uses on
piers.
tim.wheeler@baltsun.com
(c) 2010,
McClatchy-Tribune Information Services To subscribe or visit go to:
www.mcclatchy.com/
|