Hydropower's Turn
August 23, 2010
Ken Silverstein
EnergyBiz Insider
Editor-in-Chief
Hydropower may be green energy's forgotten cousin. But industry
representatives are keen to push it hard now that the U.S. Congress is
grappling with energy legislation. They say that hydro holds great
potential, noting that despite being an emissions-free source only 3
percent of 79,000 U.S. dams are capable of producing such energy.
Producing electricity from dams is one way to increase the hydro
sector's prominence. Generating power from smaller hydro units is
another way. Such facilities are less disruptive environmentally but
useful in supplying electricity to remote areas. All told, researchers
say that almost 60 percent of the nation's water energy resources are
potentially available for development using new technologies.
"Hydro is the original renewable energy source," says Duke Energy's Jim
Turner, who spoke before a group of hydro executives. "Hydro has gotten
lost in the race toward solar, wind and other currently popular green
energy sources," says the executive who heads Duke's U.S. Franchised
Electric and Gas business. "Yet, in fact, hydro represents a vast
renewable energy resource that should not be ignored."
Renewable energy makes up less than 2 percent of this nation's
generation mix. But if hydro is added to the equation, it comprises
about 7 percent, or 100,000 megawatts. Beyond accessing the currently
available water resources here, industry advocates also say that if
Congress eventually places a limit on carbon emissions, then it would
bode well for hydro.
The conventional way to produce hydroelectricity is through dams. But
the amount of power is contingent upon the speed of the water that turns
the turbines. Dams can increase the velocity by raising the water level.
But they leave big footprints and can cause local populations to
disperse. Investors, meantime, are skeptical because the permitting
process is slow and costly.
Perhaps the most fruitful activity will come from so-called
run-of-the-river facilities. They generate power by redirecting the
river's flow using distributed hydropower units that include underwater
watermills. While such technology is dependent on stream flow and access
to power lines, it does not require the construction of dams that block
water and kill off aquatic life.
Indeed, several hundred permits are now pending with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC), with many of those being granted
preliminary approval. Most of those would be run-of-the-river units.
A National Hydro Association study released this year says that hydro
energy could increase by 60,000 megawatts over 15 years and thereby
create 1.4 million new jobs -- if Congress gives it fair consideration.
The states most likely to see the most job growth are Alaska,
California, Oregon and Washington.
"Hydropower has been a critical source of renewable energy for Pacific
Gas & Electric Company as part of a diverse portfolio of low-carbon
sources of energy," says Pacific Gas & Electric Hydro Director David
Moller and the vice president of the hydropower group, in a letter to
Congress. "We support legislation that helps expand the use of
hydropower in an environmentally responsible way."
Seed Money
That's the major hurdle. To build dams that can generate lots of
electricity, local populations oftentimes have to be dispersed and
damages occur to the ecosystem. Such projects can create huge lakes that
harm sensitive streams and rivers while the dams can reduce oxygen
levels in associated waterways. That limits the ability of migratory
fish to spawn. In fact, a movement has been afoot in this country to
destroy some existing dams so that salmon can lay eggs.
Certainly, hydro plants are widely criticized for their high costs both
economically and environmentally. But the focus now is on upgrading and
retrofitting existing facilities. To that end, Senator Lisa Murkowski,
R-Alaska, has introduced two bills that aim to achieve the hydro
association's growth targets over the next 15 years.
Specifically, the bills, which also had cosponsors from the Pacific
Northwest, would direct the U.S. Department of Energy to provide the
seed money for not just research and development but also the
commercialization of hydropower. It would give FERC the ability to
streamline the permitting process -- a necessary component, given that
scores of existing dams must renew their operational licenses in the
coming years.
A second measure would furthermore provide tax credits to builders as
well as allow them access to clean energy bonds, all to raise the needed
capital. The proposed legislation comes atop a
memorandum-of-understanding released collectively by the Energy
Department, the U.S. Department of the Interior and the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers to promote hydropower by identifying prospective hydro
sites and encouraging the use of promising new technologies.
"We have an incredible amount of hydropower potential in my home state
of Alaska, and elsewhere in the country," says Murkowski. "With the
proper financing, we could keep a dozen hydro construction companies
fully employed in Alaska ... Hydropower is one of our greatest untapped
resources for generating clean, renewable electricity."
In Alaska, hydro supplies 24 percent of the state's electricity needs.
Also, more than 200 other sites there look promising for further
hydropower development.
Hydropower has an edge. It is clean and the technologies to improve
performance exist. But if it is to expand its national footprint,
though, its advocates must emphasize their commitment to sustainability
before they raise funds or endorse new legislation.
Copyright © 1996-2010 by
CyberTech,
Inc.
All rights reserved.
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.energycentral.com
|