China says water pollution double official figure
Emma Graham-Harrison
BEIJING
Tue Feb 9, 2010 1:36am EST
BEIJING (Reuters) - A new Chinese government survey of the country's
environmental problems has shown water pollution levels in 2007 were
more than twice the government's official estimate, largely because
agricultural waste was ignored.
Green Business
The data, presented by Vice Environment Protection Minister Zhang Lijun,
revives persistent questions about the quality of Chinese official
statistics and the effectiveness of a government push for cleaner growth
after decades of unbridled expansion.
The first national census on pollution sources found that discharge of
"chemical oxygen demand" (COD) -- a measure of water pollution -- in
wastewater was 30.3 million metric tons, Zhang said.
The government had said in an official paper published two years ago
that 2007 was the first year it managed to reduce water pollution, with
COD falling 3 percent to 13.8 million metric tons.
The census has been years in the making, in part because it was
extremely comprehensive, but possibly also because the contents include
painful revelations like this one.
Zhang played down the difference between the totals. He said it was
explained by the survey's expanded scope, the inclusion of agricultural
sources of wastewater -- which contributed some 13.2 million metric tons
-- and different calculation methods.
"The scope of the data was different, this time it included a survey of
agricultural sources," Zhang told a news conference.
A more detailed survey of industrial and household emissions, and a
different statistical approach also contributed to the leap. When these
were accounted for, COD was only around 5 percent above the original
2007 figure, he said.
Figures for other pollutants did not suggest widespread fiddling of
data. Acid-rain-causing sulfur dioxide emissions for example, were
pegged at 23.2 million metric tons by the census and had been estimated
at 24.7 million metric tons in the earlier data.
But whether the omission of agricultural pollutants was intentional or
not, the fact that the government managed to overlook a major
contributor to one of its benchmark pollution indicators is bound to
raise concern.
MORE DATA NOT RELEASED
There may also be other serious problems that Beijing is reluctant to
reveal. Activists who welcomed the effort to collect a more
comprehensive picture of the country's pollution problem, also called
for access to detailed results.
"It appears that the comprehensive pollution data from the census has
not been made accessible to the public," Greenpeace Campaign Director
Sze Pang Cheung said.
"We urge the government to immediately establish a strong platform
through which the public could easily access a wide range of pollution
data."
Zhang said the survey had given China a better handle on its challenges
and the country in future would hope to increase the range of pollutants
it monitored and controlled.
It was a sign of China's commitment to shifting its economic model, he
added, which should allow it to cap pollution growth at an earlier stage
of development than western nations.
"Because China has taken a different development path than other
advanced nations, it is very likely that the peak of our pollution will
come (earlier)," he said.
But he added that the government would not change the baseline or survey
methods for a target of cutting wastewater pollution 10 percent by 2010
from 2005 levels.
"The emission reduction base was determined on the basis of 2005
environmental data, and so the targets...have to remain the same," he
said.
© Thomson Reuters 2010 All rights reserved

|