Lawmakers OK winner-take-all bill
Patrick gets measure to bypass Electoral College for
president
The Massachusetts
Legislature has approved a law intended to bypass the Electoral
College system and ensure that the winner of the presidential
election is determined by the national popular vote.
“What we are submitting is the idea that the president should be
selected by the majority of people in the United States of
America,’’ Senator James B. Eldridge, an Acton Democrat, said as he
introduced the bill on the Senate floor.
Under the law, which was enacted by the House last week, all 12 of
the state's electoral votes would be awarded to the candidate who
receives the most votes nationally. But the bill would take effect
only if enough states adopted the legislation to combine for at
least 270 electoral votes, the amount needed to win the presidency.
Illinois, New Jersey, Hawaii, Maryland, and Washington have adopted
the legislation. If enough states pass the legislation, the
candidate winning the most votes nationally would be assured a
majority of Electoral College votes.
Supporters are campaigning, state by state, to get such bills
enacted. Once states accounting for a majority of the electoral
votes (270 of 538) have enacted the laws, the candidate winning the
most votes nationally would be assured a majority of Electoral
College votes.
That would hold true no matter how the other states vote and how
their electoral votes are distributed.
Illinois, New Jersey, Hawaii, Maryland, and Washington have already
approved the legislation, according to the National Popular Vote
campaign's website.
The current Electoral College system is confusing and causes
presidential candidates to focus unduly on a handful of battleground
states, supporters say. They also say that the popular vote winner
has lost in four of the nation's 56 elections.
Presidential candidates now "ignore wide swaths of the country" that
they consider strong blue or red states and focus their campaigning
on contested states, Eldridge said.
If the president were picked by national popular vote, he argued,
candidates would spread their attention more evenly.
"That's really what we're talking about, making sure that every
voter, no matter where they live, that they're being reached out
to," he said.
Opponents say the current system works. They are concerned about a
possible scenario in which Candidate X wins nationally, but
Candidate Y has won in Massachusetts. In that case, all the state's
12 electoral votes would go to Candidate X, the candidate who was
not supported by Massachusetts voters.
Senate Minority Leader Richard Tisei, the Republican candidate for
lieutenant governor, also criticized the proponents for not
following the normal procedures to seek a constitutional amendment.
"The thing about this that bothers me the most is it's so sneaky,"
he said. "This is the way that liberals do things a lot of times,
very sneaky.
"This is sort of an end run around the Constitution," Tisei said.
The measure passed both branches of the Legislature in 2008, but did
not make it all the way through the process.
Martin Finucane can be reached at
mfinucane@globe.com
Correction: An earlier version of this story
failed to mention that the law would take effect only if a minimum
number of states adopted the legislation. It needs approval in
enough states to account for at least 270 electoral votes, the
number needed to win the presidency.
|