Funding for Renewables Projects in the Public and Private Sectors

Currency

 

In the last few months, I’ve tried to learn more about the huge, long-term role that the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) plays in supporting the development of clean energy technologies.  I see the work they’ve performed with solar energy leader Solyndra to be the perfect example.  Here’s a case where public support enabled a private company to raise vitally important additional capital.  Had NREL not been there (with
over $700 million as I recall), their initial private investors may have been scared away.  NREL’s robust commitment showed these investors that they had deeply committed partners, which, I’m sure, made them feel much safer in making commitments of their own.

Of course, most companies that ask for money receive none at all -- let alone $700 million.  But how does this process work?  Is it fair?  Why do certain types of companies seem to be favored over others?  It seems that perhaps mature renewables technologies, like PV (where Solyndra plays), may be favored over newer ideas.  (Solyndra’s well proven breakthrough in CIGS (copper indium gallium (di) selenide), generated significant improvement in efficiencies and reductions in cost).


Unfortunately, the workings of this process are not clear -- though perhaps that’s by design.  As an example, consider solar thermal/CSP (concentrated solar power).  PV and wind have a several-decade head-start over CSP and other nascent technologies.  I interviewed CSP industry leader Ausra's founder David Mills for my book on renewables, and he told me that Ausra had gotten to round #2 in one of these DoE contests, but that they didn't get to the finals.  I asked if he resented being turned down, and -- perhaps simply out of gentlemanliness and good sportsmanship – he said that he didn't, but indicated with a smile that he plans simply to try again another time.

I try to stay in communication with all the readers at 2GreenEnergy on this subject, and I can't count the number who have requested our insights on this matter.  Regrettably, all I can turn up are anecdotal incidents similar to those above.  If readers here wouldn’t mind sharing their own experiences with this process, I’m sure many people would be interested. Thank you.

Reader Comments

hiro-chandwani-  It is a common thinking everywhere all over the world. In India, the scene is not different or rather it is worse. Due to the new technology, no private party is interested in venturing into the CSP thermal projects. Even the technocrats with indegenously developed low cost designs are not encouraged either by government agencies or by private corporates. There is no funding for private research work at all. They would rather go for high cost foreign consultants even though their technology may not have been tried out over longer periods.Govt. of India has volunterily opted to reduce carbon emissions by 25% by 2020 but how is this going to be achieved only time will tell.

Bayat-  I have several projects for new energy and I have examined some of them. I am sure that energy crises will solve by my findings. I have new and economical inventions for wind and water turbines and one very important project for clean and very cheap source energy that is going to examination process.
I am writing this comment because some researchers like me are working hard by their own expenses on many countries. I tried several times to share my experiences with famous companies, but there were no response perhaps because of my location.
Unfortunately political and other cases between countries are effecting science and technology progress.

A.M. Bayat  To subscribe or visit go to:  http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com