Groups want coal ash labeled hazard; $11 billion a
year at stake
Mar 5 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - Rick Stouffer The Pittsburgh
Tribune-Review
Environmental groups and companies are arguing over whether coal ash --
the common name for waste from coal-fired power plants -- is hazardous
to human health.
The coal industry, electricity producers, coal-producing states and the
Environmental Protection Agency say coal ash is safe. Regulating it
could destroy between $6 billion and $11 billion in annual benefits from
using coal waste in its various forms.
But environmental groups are demanding that the EPA reverse its findings
and declare coal waste to be a hazard. They say that's the only way to
eliminate haphazard state regulations and ongoing water contamination
from toxic chemicals in coal waste, much of which is contained in
excavated pits.
The EPA is expected to issue a decision on coal waste next
month.
"The EPA has said and twice before has testified before Congress that
coal waste isn't hazardous," said Tom Robl, associate director of the
University of Kentucky's Center for Applied Energy Research, in
Lexington, Ky. "The EPA would have to reverse itself, when there is no
question the reuse of this material is not hazardous."
Last week, Environmental Integrity Project and Earthjustice released a
report that said four Western Pennsylvania sites are among 31 nationwide
allowing waste from coal-fired power plants to pollute nearby rivers,
creeks, groundwater and wetlands with toxic substances.
Opponents say coal waste often contains elevated levels of metals such
as arsenic, cadmium, lead and selenium that can cause cancer and
neurological damage.
Experts said the impetus for reviewing coal waste regulations was a Dec.
22, 2008, accident near Kingston, Tenn., about 35 miles west of
Knoxville. About 1 billion gallons of coal waste sludge broke through a
holding pond dike and covered about 400 acres of land around the
Tennessee Valley Authority's coal-burning Kingston power plant.
"The Kingston holding pond ... certainly would not have been legal in
Pennsylvania, which has some of the strictest coal ash regulations,"
Robl said. "That was not a coal ash problem at Kingston, that was an
engineering failure, and the reaction to the spill has been based in
fear."
"Science doesn't support the classification of coal ash (waste) as
hazardous," said Ken Reisinger, the Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection's deputy secretary for waste, air and radiation
management.
A 2009 study commissioned by the American Coal Council found the annual
economic impact of coal ash and other products -- through revenue from
selling the material, avoiding disposal costs and using the products as
building materials like concrete and drywall -- was estimated at between
$6.4 billion and $11.4 billion.
One example is the National Gypsum Co. wallboard plant in Shippingport,
Beaver County, which gets its raw material from FirstEnergy Corp.'s
2,460-megawatt D. Bruce Mansfield coal-fired power plant. One megawatt
can power 800 homes.
"Our facility in Shippingport was built specifically to handle the
material from the flue gas desulfurization process at the FirstEnergy
power plant. It's moved by conveyor to our plant," said Nancy Spurlock,
spokeswoman for Charlotte-based National Gypsum.
FirstEnergy sells 400,000 tons of the 1 million tons of material
produced annually at Bruce Mansfield to National Gypsum.
"We could truck in natural rock to make wallboard, but that would be
much more expensive," Spurlock said. "If the material is classified
hazardous, it would have a major impact on us, plus impact other
businesses, like trucking." The plant at peak production employs more
than 80, she said.
Environmental groups say laws on the books to regulate toxic substances
are too lax, according to Lisa Marcucci, a Pleasant Hills resident and
Pennsylvania outreach coordinator for the Environmental Integrity
Project, based in Washington.
"The industry always states it's complying with the state's regulations,
but those regulations are riddled with loopholes," Marcucci said.
Marcucci says the coal ash-producers perform too much self-testing, that
the state Department of Environmental Protection's system allowing
self-testing is "too much the fox guarding the henhouse."
"We've had programs in place for decades to deal with coal ash, and
we've significantly improved our process over decades of regulation,"
said DEP's Reisinger.
Coal-fired power plants in Pennsylvania annually produce about 20
million tons of various types of coal-burning waste. Nearly 65 percent
of the total is reused, according to data provided by Sen. Bob Casey's
office. Eleven coal-fired power plants owned by four different companies
are located in Western Pennsylvania.
"If the byproducts created from burning coal are classified as hazardous
waste, it will take huge amounts of money to create the infrastructure
to handle that waste," said Mark Durbin, spokesman for Akron, Ohio-based
FirstEnergy. "Those costs would be passed on to customers."
Rick Stouffer is a Pittsburgh Tribune-Review staff writer and can be
reached at 412-320-7853 or via e-mail.
(c) 2010,
McClatchy-Tribune Information Services
|