House Republicans hope resolution on EPA will send
message
Washington (Platts)--2Mar2010/634 pm EST/2334 GMT
Republicans in the US House of Representatives Tuesday moved to bar
the US Environmental Protection Agency from using its current authority
to regulate greenhouse gases, saying that even if their effort fails it
will send a message that the public will not bear the cost of the
regulations.
The resolution, known as a resolution of disapproval, was
introduced less than a month before the regulatory agency is due to
promulgate its tailpipe emissions rules for light-duty vehicles, which
in turn will prompt regulation of stationary sources of GHGs.
"We get elected to represent our constituency," said
Representative Joseph Barton, a leading sponsor of the resolution of
disapproval. "I'm of the opinion that what the EPA has done is wrong, is
faulty, is not called for."
Barton said that introduction of a resolution of disapproval
would help highlight the cost of EPA's proposed carbon regulations, and
"also show the American people the fault behind the finding" that GHGs
endanger public health.
Barton, a Texas Republican, and other Republicans told
reporters at the Capitol Tuesday that EPA had based its endangerment
finding for GHGs on false scientific conclusions, including from the
UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and the finding should
therefore be thrown out.
"If EPA made a decision without looking at underlying science,
we have to disapprove of that until or unless proper science is
brought," said California Republican Darrell Issa, a leading cosponsor
of the resolution.
Issa would not say if he would support any legislation to curb
carbon emissions, and he questioned whether they were really a problem.
Still, he talked about Congress' need to lead on the issue.
"I am very aware that we should not simply have an agency take
it over, and then what happens, happens," he said.
Barton and Issa's resolution is supported by House Republican
leadership, and by a handful of members from the other side of the
aisle. Democrats Ike Skelton of Missouri and Collin Peterson of
Minnesota introduced an identical resolution last week.
The House efforts mirror another resolution of disapproval
introduced in the US Senate by Alaska Republican Lisa Murkowski, who
plans to bring it up for a vote later this month.
All of these resolutions would nullify EPA's finding that GHG
emissions endanger public health, and would prevent the agency from
regulating those emissions under the Clean Air Act.
SENATE RESOLUTION MAY PASS; HOUSE FAR LESS LIKELY
In contrast to the way the legislative process usually
operates, it will be more difficult to pass the resolution of
disapproval in the House than in the Senate.
Senate rules make such measures easier to pass than ordinary
bills, and Murkowski's effort stands a good chance of winning the needed
51 votes.
House rules, meanwhile, allow leadership to prevent resolutions
of disapproval from coming to the floor, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
is unlikely to call for a vote on the measure no matter how much
bipartisan support it receives.
To come into effect, the resolution would have to pass both the
Senate and the House, and would then go to President Barack Obama, who
could choose to veto it.
The House resolution came the same day a group of 13 Democratic
senators wrote to Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, requesting that
EPA retain its authority to regulate existing coal-fired power plants
even if Congress passes comprehensive climate and energy legislation.
"We need to begin to de-carbonize our utility sector and make
the transition to clean energy," said the group, which included
Environment and Public Works Committee Chairwoman Barbara Boxer, who
co-sponsored the Senate's original cap-and-trade bill.
"As a result, we are writing to ask you to ensure that energy
and climate legislation does not weaken the Clean Air Act's application
to existing coal-fired power plants, the nation's biggest global warming
polluters, so that they meet up-to-date technology standards for carbon
dioxide."
--Jean Chemnick, jean_chemnick@platts.com
|