SRS backer asks federal panel to keep Yucca Mountain
Mar 27 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - Rob Pavey The Augusta
Chronicle, Ga.
The Energy Department's decision to abandon a planned nuclear waste
repository in Nevada's Yucca Mountain will create long-term problems for
Savannah River Site, a South Carolina official told a blue ribbon panel
convened to explore alternatives.
"Yucca Mountain is the only known means to dispose of high-level waste,
and it must not be discarded until a better disposal option has been
verified," said Rick McLeod, the executive director of the SRS Community
Reuse Organization, a regional economic development coalition.
Yucca Mountain, 90 miles from Las Vegas, was being designed to
accommodate radioactive material now stored at 121 temporary sites in 39
states, including SRS, where high-level wastes are stored in steel
cylinders that were to be shipped elsewhere.
Yucca Mountain also would have housed 70,000 tons of waste from the
nation's 104 commercial reactors, which are generating about 2,000
additional tons of spent fuel each year.
President Obama and Energy Secretary Steven Chu opted last year
to cancel further work on the project.
A 15-member Blue Ribbon Panel created to explore alternatives held its
first meeting this week in Washington, where McLeod and others delivered
comments.
McLeod asked that the commission include the reinstatement of Yucca
Mountain among the alternatives being explored.
"For those of us who live near DOE sites with defense high-level wastes,
a geologic repository at Yucca Mountain has always been the only
answer," he said. "There is not now, nor has there ever been, a Plan B."
The panel, led by former U.S. Rep. Lee Hamilton of Indiana and former
national security adviser Brent Scowcroft, needs representation from the
communities and states most affected by nuclear waste, McLeod said.
"We respectfully insist that affected communities have representation
and input into the panel's deliberations," he said.
McLeod said reprocessing of nuclear waste should also be examined.
Though it could reduce stockpiles of spent fuel, it would only reduce --
not eliminate -- the need for a long-term storage site for waste, he
said.
Other comments submitted Friday included a request from South Carolina
Public Service Commission Chairman David Wright, who also heads the
47-member Nuclear Waste Strategy Coalition. He urged the panel to
continue to review Yucca Mountain, where more than $10 billion has been
spent in an effort to establish the repository.
The panel is scheduled to make its first series of recommendations in
fall of 2011.
(c) 2010,
McClatchy-Tribune Information Services
|