Will Canada's wind turbines invade lakes?
Feb 26 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - Tina Lam Detroit Free Press
A proposal to put 700 wind turbines along the shores of Lakes St. Clair
and Erie, each about as tall as a 40-story building, is provoking
controversy in Canada and the U.S.
The turbines, planted on the lake bottom and arranged in grids jutting
more than 3 miles out into the lakes, easily would be seen from the
marinas and mansions of the Grosse Pointes, as well as from Rockwood,
Gibraltar and Grosse Ile.
Some residents on both sides of the border are worried about how the
windmills would affect shoreline property values, fishing, boating and
bird migration. The turbines would be on major migratory pathways for
birds at several major wildlife refuges, including Point Pelee, Ontario,
and the Detroit International Wildlife Refuge.
The province of Ontario, which recently lifted a moratorium on offshore
wind projects, is aggressively pursuing green energy under a new law
because it hopes to close its coal plants within five years.
"I am furious at our provincial government for doing this,"
said Maureen Anderson, a resident of Amherstburg whose family has a
charter fishing business. "Who wants to go relax in a giant industrial
zone?"
Storm brews over Ontario winds
A plan by SouthPoint Wind, a Canadian firm, to pepper the shores off
western Ontario with 700 spinning wind turbines is setting off alarms.
"There's already a groundswell of opposition," said Rick Fryer, a
councillor in Amherstburg, just north of one of the 13 proposed wind
farms. "People are already unhappy with these on land, let alone what
the sunset will look like through these in the lake."
Charles Parcells, who lives in Grosse Pointe Park, has modeled how the
turbines would look from the Grosse Pointes: like a long line of skinny
palm trees on the horizon. "The view of Lake St Clair from the American
shore will be transformed for the worse," he said. Property values of
expensive shoreline homes could drop, he said.
"The turbines could have a huge impact on boating and fishing on the
lake, especially for those of us whose livelihood depends on the lake
sustaining the quality of the recreational fishing it provides," said
Doug Cummings of Chesterfield Township, who runs a fishing charter
business.
But some say it's the future. Mark LaBelle of Clinton Township owns a
powerboat and spends lots of time on Lake St. Clair. "Other countries
are doing it, and if we want to stay a world leader on technology, we
need to embrace some of these things," he said. "I look at it as job
creation."
3 farms in Lake St. Clair
The turbines in the SouthPoint Wind project would be in 13 rectangular
farms, three along southern Lake St. Clair and 10 along northern Lake
Erie. The rectangles would be a mile out from shore, about a mile wide
and 3 miles deep, with 55 turbines each.
The turbines would stick up 410 feet out of the water, atop pillars
hammered into the lake bottom.
SouthPoint Wind is to submit its plans to the province of Ontario, which
is pursuing large wind projects under its new Green Energy Act. The
province had a moratorium on offshore wind projects on the Great Lakes
after an outcry over plans by SouthPoint to put turbines in Lake Erie in
2006, but lifted the ban in 2008.
SouthPoint's project would be larger than a similar plan on Lake
Michigan near Ludington and Pentwater, which has drawn strong opposition
from local residents and officials. That project was to have 100-200
turbines and generate 1,000 megawatts of power, 40% less than the
Ontario wind farms.
Those two projects, plus an even larger one proposed for northern Lake
Ontario, are "validation of the keen interest from wind developers to go
offshore," where wind is stronger and steadier than on land, said Skip
Pruss, chairman of Michigan's Great Lakes Offshore Wind Council. The
council has identified Michigan waters where turbines could go and is
working on legislation for such projects, which should be ready in
March.
Officials at SouthPoint, headquartered in Leamington, declined to be
interviewed, but answered questions by e-mail.
The company said many states around the Great Lakes are looking at wind
power offshore, and by getting out in front with its plans, it hopes to
spur wind manufacturers to locate in Ontario and create jobs.
Environmental concerns
The turbines would be near Point Pelee, a Canadian wildlife sanctuary,
and the Detroit International Wildlife Refuge. "We're in a sensitive
eco-corridor," said John Hartig, director of the Detroit refuge, which
stretches along the shore 48 miles between Monroe and Detroit. The
refuges are in a major pathway for migrating birds, bats and waterfowl.
"Those are issues that would have to be dealt with," he said.
In plan documents, SouthPoint acknowledges the wind farms could have an
effect on animals, but says the effects would be small and outweighed by
the benefits.
Gord Meuser is a member of Citizens against Lake Erie Wind Turbines,
which has fought SouthPoint's plans for turbines near Point Pelee since
2006. The group has consulted experts who have said wind farms could
harm birds, waterfowl, bats and fish and the noise from them would
disturb humans. The group is also concerned that building turbine bases
on the lake bottom will kick up sediment contaminated with toxins.
"From everything we've seen, the government is plowing ahead without
those concerns being answered," Meuser said.
A spokeswoman for the Ontario Ministry of Environment said the company
will be required to do environmental studies.
Ontario is to decide
Local residents don't call the shots; the provincial government does,
said Ruth Coursey, chief administrative officer in Lakeshore, Canada, on
Lake St. Clair. Coursey likes the idea of wind energy replacing
polluting coal plants. "I believe the province will act responsibly,"
she said.
On the U.S. side, few people are aware of the project, since no notices
are required here. But some are bothered by the prospect of turbines on
the horizon and whether they'll disrupt fishing and boating.
"I think the public outcry will be huge, since visually, they're ugly,"
said Cummings, who operates bass charters. "I do a lot of fishing in
Canadian waters. The amount of turbines sounds insane."
The turbines could be a boating hazard, he said.
"If they don't let me fish in that zone, I'll be vehemently opposed,"
said John Maniaci, a professional fisherman who works with Bass Pro
Shops. "But I know I'll have no say-so, it's the government of Canada."
Contact TINA LAM: 313-222-6421 or tlam@freepress.com
Related content
SouthPoint Wind project
Here is a look at the proposal:
--700 turbines, each standing 400 feet above the lake's surface, or
about as tall as a 40-story building.
--13 individual wind farms with turbines in rows in a rectangle a mile
wide jutting some 3 miles into the lake. The closest turbines would be
about a mile from the Canadian shore.
--About 165 turbines would be in southern Lake St. Clair and the rest in
northern Lake Erie. They would likely be visible from the Grosse Pointes
and from Grosse Ile, Rockwood and Gibraltar and to boaters and anglers.
--Cables would be buried on the lake bottom to transmit electricity to
the shore.
--The developer is the Liovas family of Leamington, a residential and
commercial developer.
Source: SouthPoint Wind documents
(c) 2010,
McClatchy-Tribune Information Services
|