Land for carbon storage a challenge
May 12 - The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Pennsylvania has the underground storage capacity to hold more than 300
years' worth of carbon dioxide extracted from coal-fired power plants in
the state at a cost competitive with carbon storage systems worldwide, a
state official said Tuesday.
The state's problem in developing what's known as carbon capture and
sequestration on a commercial scale, which proponents say could create
jobs, is that no single land owner controls a sufficient geographic area
to move a project forward.
"We want to get carbon capture and sequestration on a commercial scale
moving -- in the next five years," said John Quigley, secretary of the
state's Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. He spoke to
600 attendees at the Ninth Annual Carbon Capture & Sequestration
Conference in the Pittsburgh Hilton Hotel.
Carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere is viewed by experts as a
major contributor to global warming. Some analyses project that without
a major push on advanced carbon capture and storage technology, power
prices by 2030 will jump 65 percent and cost the economy as much as $1.5
trillion.
Pennsylvania's Act 129, signed into law in 2008, mandated the
assessment of geologic formations for carbon dioxide storage. The state
and Department of Conservation and Natural Resources partnered with the
Clinton Climate Initiative to look at the viability of a large-scale
carbon capture and storage network in the state.
The Clinton Initiative in Boston was started to create solutions to
issues driving climate change, such as greenhouse gas emissions like
carbon dioxide.
A Clinton study looked at retrofitting six coal-fired power plants with
carbon capture equipment, which would be connected by centralized
pipelines to a storage area. The cost to capture carbon dioxide and
compress the emissions from the plants was $6.9 billion, and to
transport and store the carbon dioxide was another $1.2 billion, the
study found.
"We found that the capture, transport and storage of carbon dioxide,
plus annual operating expenses to store the carbon dioxide, would cost
about $73 a ton of carbon dioxide," comparable with any existing or
proposed system in the world, Quigley said.
Benefits of moving quickly to adopt carbon storage and sequestration
technology include avoiding liabilities that a coal-dependent state like
Pennsylvania would face when new carbon regulations are introduced,
potentially reducing the cost of electricity and making power more
attractive for export.
A large-scale carbon capture and storage system would help retain jobs
related to coal mining and coal-fired power generation, while creating
an unspecified number of new jobs and exportable technologies, the
Clinton Initiative said.
Pennsylvania's problem is land control, according to Quigley.
Department of Energy criteria state that 100 square miles of underground
land area would be needed in order
to capture 90 percent of carbon emissions from a 500-megawatt coal-fired
power plant for 40 years and pump the captured carbon dioxode into an
underground space 300 feet thick.
A 500-megawatt coal-fired plant is not a large facility. FirstEnergy
Corp.'s Bruce Mansfield Power Station in Shippingport, Beaver County,
has a generating capacity of more than 2,700 megawatts. One megawatt
powers about 800 homes.
"We looked at both public and private lands statewide, and none we
looked at had 100 square miles of property under a single owner,"
Quigley said. "The state owns sufficient state forest land, but the
underground space only is 30 feet thick."
Quigley suggests that to make commercial-scale carbon capture and
sequestration viable, the federal government may have to step in,
perhaps taking over deep salt aquifers for carbon storage.
-----
To see more of The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review or to subscribe to the
newspaper, go to http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/.
Copyright (c) 2010, The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
(c) 2010,
McClatchy-Tribune Information Services To subscribe or visit go to:
www.mcclatchy.com/
|