Leaving oil in the ground to fight climate change
A new initiative to fight climate change and
conserve forests by leaving oil in the ground has taken off in Martin Khor WHAT would a country's leaders do if oil reserves were discovered beneath the tropical rainforests of that nation's premier national park? The government would naturally be in a dilemma. If the forests are destroyed to extract the oil, the country and the world would lose the national park and its biodiversity-rich forest. Moreover, the extraction and use of the oil would release a lot of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, contributing to climate change. But if the oil were to be left in the ground in order to protect the forests and avoid emissions, the country would lose a lot of export earnings and state revenues that could be used for development. Economists call this an opportunity cost. Given the dominant priorities and values of the modern world, in which economics and business are put above the environment, most countries would chop the forests, destroy the park and extract the oil. Recently, I heard about a real case of a developing country facing this very dilemma and putting up an alternative approach to resolving it.
It has four major ecological regions - the coast
facing the Pacific Ocean, a set of islands in that ocean, the Andes
mountains in which its capital city In Quito, at the Ministry of Patrimony (which is in charge of the country's environment), Professor Carlos Larrea Maldonado explained to me Ecuador's unique initiative to leave the large oil reserves in the ground at the country's Yasuni National Park in return for international funds. The funds, which are partly to make up for the loss of oil revenue, would be used by the country to conserve its forests, develop renewable energy, and promote social development.
Dr Maldonado is a professor of social and global
studies at the
The country's President, Rafael Correa, announced
at the United Nations that This was in order to put social and environmental values first, while other ways would be found to obtain economic benefits for the country. In the initiative, the international community would contribute at least half the revenue that the state would have received by extracting the oil, while the government would assume up to half of the opportunity cost of keeping the oil in the ground.
The
There are 846 million barrels of recoverable oil reserves found in the ITT field, which are estimated to yield revenues of $7.25 billion (at present value) to the state. The government plans to leave the oil in the ground, and continue to conserve the park. This would also avoid an estimated 407 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions that would have been generated by burning the ITT oil. The 407 million tonnes may be valued at $8.07 billion, according to the current prices of carbon dioxide traded in the European carbon market ($19.81 per tonne of carbon dioxide).
Under the Yasuni-ITT initiative, Thus, of the $7.25 billion of oil revenue foregone, the government would bear half the cost while an international fund contributed by foreign governments and private donations would bear the other half.
The fund's capital will be invested in renewable
energy (hydroelectric, geothermal, wind and solar) projects in order to
overcome The interest earned from the fund would be used to conserve forests in 44 protected areas, help small farmers reforest and manage a million hectares of forests, and promote energy efficiency and social development.
The UN is supporting the project, with the UNDP
already establishing the trust fund. The first contribution of $200,000
was made in mid-September by So far, the UNFCCC has recognised the avoidance of deforestation as contributing to the mitigation of climate change, and developing countries can apply for funds under its system to conserve the forest and for reforestation. It is proposing, with the Yasuni-ITT initiative as a first example, that a new mechanism be set up to fund developing countries that leave fossil fuel reserves located in environmentally or culturally fragile areas underground indefinitely. According to criteria worked out by Prof. Maldonado and his team, the countries that fulfil the conditions, besides Ecuador, include Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, India, Papua New Guinea, Brazil, Colombia, Venezuela, Bolivia, Peru, Costa Rica, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Madagascar. The Yasuni initiative has received support from many famous individuals including Nobel Prize winners (such as Desmond Tutu and Rigoberta Menchu), former political leaders (Mikhail Gorbachev of Russia, Fernando Cardoso of Brazil and Felipe Gonzales of Spain), Prince Charles, and many international organisations such as UNASUR (South American Union of Nations), the Organisation of American States and environmental and indigenous peoples' NGOs. It will be interesting to see how far the message of the Yasuni initiative eventually travels, and whether more such initiatives are taken by other countries in a move to conserve forests, leave oil or coal in the ground, and fight climate change, with the countries concerned and the international community sharing the costs and benefits.
Martin Khor is Executive Director of the South
Centre, an intergovernmental policy think-tank of developing countries,
and former Director of the
*Third World Resurgence No. 240/241, August-September 2010, pp 5-6 |
|
Originally published: http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/resurgence/2010/240-241/climate1.htm |