Civilization's Foundation Eroding
Lester R. Brown
The thin layer of topsoil that
covers the planet’s land surface is the foundation of
civilization. This soil, typically 6 inches or so deep, was
formed over long stretches of geological time as new soil
formation exceeded the natural rate of erosion. But sometime
within the last century, as human and livestock populations
expanded, soil erosion began to exceed new soil formation over
large areas.
This is not new. In 1938, Walter Lowdermilk, a senior official
in the Soil Conservation Service of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, traveled abroad to look at lands that had been
cultivated for thousands of years, seeking to learn how these
older civilizations had coped with soil erosion. He found that
some had managed their land well, maintaining its fertility over
long stretches of history, and were thriving. Others had failed
to do so and left only remnants of their illustrious pasts.
In a section of his report entitled “The Hundred Dead Cities,”
he described a site in northern Syria, near Aleppo, where
ancient buildings were still standing in stark isolated relief,
but they were on bare rock. During the seventh century, the
thriving region had been invaded, initially by a Persian army
and later by nomads out of the Arabian Desert. In the process,
soil and water conservation practices used for centuries were
abandoned. Lowdermilk noted, “Here erosion had done its
worst….if the soils had remained, even though the cities were
destroyed and the populations dispersed, the area might be
re-peopled again and the cities rebuilt, but now that the soils
are gone, all is gone.”
Wind and water erosion take a toll. The latter can be seen in
the silting of reservoirs and in satellite photographs of muddy,
silt-laden rivers flowing into the sea. Pakistan’s two large
reservoirs, Mangla and Tarbela, which store Indus River water
for the country’s vast irrigation network, are losing roughly 1
percent of their storage capacity each year as they fill with
silt from deforested watersheds.
Ethiopia, a mountainous country with highly erodible soils, is
losing close to 2 billion tons of topsoil a year, washed away by
rain. This is one reason Ethiopia always seems to be on the
verge of famine, never able to accumulate enough grain reserves
to provide meaningful food security.
Soil erosion from the deterioration of grasslands is widespread.
The world’s steadily growing herds of cattle and flocks of sheep
and goats forage on the two fifths of the earth’s land surface
that is too dry, too steeply sloping, or not fertile enough to
sustain crop production. This area supports most of the world’s
3.3 billion cattle, sheep, and goats, all ruminants with complex
digestive systems that enable them to digest roughage,
converting it into beef, mutton, and milk.
![]() Credit: iStock Photo/stevenallan |
An estimated 200 million people
make their living as pastoralists, tending cattle, sheep, and
goats. Since most land is held in common in pastoral societies,
overgrazing is difficult to control. As a result, half of the
world’s grasslands are degraded. The problem is highly visible
throughout Africa, the Middle East, Central Asia, and northwest
China, where the growth in livestock numbers tracks that in
human numbers. In 1950, Africa was home to 227 million people
and 273 million livestock. By 2007, there were 965 million
people and 824 million livestock.
Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country, is losing 351,000
hectares (867,000 acres) of rangeland and cropland to
desertification each year. While Nigeria’s human population was
growing from 37 million in 1950 to 148 million in 2007, a
fourfold expansion, its livestock population grew from roughly 6
million to 102 million, a 17-fold jump. With the forage needs of
Nigeria’s 16 million cattle and 86 million sheep and goats
exceeding the sustainable yield of grasslands, the northern part
of the country is slowly turning to desert. If Nigeria continues
toward its projected 289 million people by 2050, the
deterioration will only accelerate.
Iran, with 73 million people, illustrates the pressures facing
the Middle East. With 8 million cattle and 79 million sheep and
goats—the source of wool for its fabled rug-making
industry—Iran’s rangelands are deteriorating from overstocking.
In the southeastern province of Sistan-Balochistan, sand storms
have buried 124 villages, forcing their abandonment. Drifting
sands have covered grazing areas—starving livestock and
depriving villagers of their livelihood.
Neighboring Afghanistan is faced with a similar situation. The
Registan Desert is migrating westward, encroaching on
agricultural areas. A U.N. Environment Programme (UNEP) team
reports that “up to 100 villages have been submerged by
windblown dust and sand.” In the country’s northwest, sand dunes
are moving onto agricultural land in the upper reaches of the
Amu Darya basin, their path cleared by the loss of stabilizing
vegetation from firewood gathering and overgrazing. The UNEP
team observed sand dunes 15 meters high blocking roads, forcing
residents to establish new routes.
China faces similarly difficult challenges. After the economic
reforms in 1978 that shifted the responsibility for farming from
large state-organized production teams to farm families, China’s
cattle, sheep, and goat populations spiraled upward. While the
United States, a country with comparable grazing capacity, has
97 million cattle, China has a slightly smaller herd of 82
million. But while the United States has only 9 million sheep
and goats, China has 284 million. Concentrated in China’s
western and northern provinces, sheep and goats are destroying
the land’s protective vegetation. The wind then does the rest,
removing the soil and converting productive rangeland into
desert.
China’s desertification may be the worst in the world. Wang Tao,
one of the world’s leading desert scholars, reports that from
1950 to 1975 an average of 600 square miles turned to desert
each year. By century’s end, nearly 1,400 square miles (3,600
square kilometers) were going to desert annually. Over the last
half-century, some 24,000 villages in northern and western China
have been entirely or partly abandoned as a result of being
overrun by drifting sand.
China is now at war. It is not invading armies that are claiming
its territory, but expanding deserts. Old deserts are advancing
and new ones are forming like guerrilla forces striking
unexpectedly, forcing Beijing to fight on several fronts.
Soil erosion often results from the demand-driven expansion of
cultivation onto marginal land. Over the last century or so
there were massive cropland expansions in two countries—the
United States and the Soviet Union—and both ended in disaster.
During the late nineteenth century, millions of Americans pushed
westward, homesteading on the Great Plains, plowing vast areas
of grassland to produce wheat. Much of this land—highly erodible
when plowed—should have remained in grass. This overexpansion
culminated in the 1930s Dust Bowl, a traumatic period chronicled
in John Steinbeck’s novel The Grapes of Wrath. In a
crash program to save its soils, the United States returned
large areas of eroded cropland to grass, adopted strip-cropping,
and planted thousands of miles of tree shelterbelts.
![]()
Credit:
iStock Photo/Brasil2
|
The second major expansion came in the Soviet Union beginning
in the mid-1950s. In an all-out effort to expand grain
production, the Soviets plowed an area of grassland larger than
the wheat area of Australia and Canada combined. The result, as
Soviet agronomists had predicted, was an ecological
disaster—another Dust Bowl. Kazakhstan, where the plowing was
concentrated, has abandoned 40 percent of its grainland since
1980. On the remaining cultivated land, the wheat yield per acre
is one sixth of that in France, Western Europe’s leading wheat
producer.
A third massive cropland expansion is now taking place in the
Brazilian Amazon Basin and in the cerrado, a
savannah-like region bordering the basin on its south side. Land
in the cerrado, like that in the U.S. and Soviet
expansion, is vulnerable to soil erosion. This cropland
expansion is pushing cattle ranchers into the Amazon forests,
where ecologists are convinced that continuing to clear the area
of trees will end in disaster. Reporter Geoffrey Lean,
summarizing the findings of a 2006 Brazilian scientific
symposium in London’s Independent, notes that the
alternative to a rainforest in the Amazon would be “dry savannah
at best, desert at worst.”
Civilization depends on fertile soils. Ultimately, the health of
the people cannot be separated from the health of the land.
Conserving and rebuilding soils will be covered in the next Plan
B 4.0 Book Byte.
Adapted from Chapter 2, “Population Pressure: Land and Water” in
Lester R. Brown,
Plan
B 4.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization (New York:
W.W. Norton & Company, 2009), available on-line at
www.earth-policy.org/index.php?/books/pb4