Story Published: Sep 1, 2010
WASHINGTON – When word came that
President Barack Obama was going to have an impromptu meeting with
Mayor Michael Bloomberg Aug. 27, many in Indian country were
hopeful. Hopeful that a president who has sometimes made it his
business to call attention to issues tinged by race, religion, and
other “hot button” forces would talk to the New York City leader
about a racially-charged comment he had recently made involving
Native Americans.
The hopes ranged from small – recognition – to large – getting the
president to secure an apology. No matter their size, they were
quashed.
Instead, Obama – who has sometimes made a point of publicly
supporting Indian issues – engaged Bloomberg in a conversation about
the economy, and played a round of golf. Adding insult to injury,
some New York papers have cited anonymous sources saying that Obama
was feeling out Bloomberg for a job in his administration.
When the golf game was over, they moved on.
Many in Indian country have been unable and unwilling to move on
from a series of Old West-inspired musings offered by Bloomberg to
the New York Daily News in an article published Aug. 13: “I’ve said
this to David Paterson, I said, ‘You know, get yourself a cowboy hat
and a shotgun. ... If there’s ever a great video, it’s you standing
in the middle of the New York State Thruway saying, you know, ‘Read
my lips – the law of the land is this, and we’re going to enforce
the law.’”
Bloomberg was talking about how he felt the New York governor should
handle a quagmire involving a new state law taxing cigarettes sold
on Indian lands – a law that tribes say breaks their treaties and
other sovereign rights.
No matter the tax conflict, the problem that many Indians have had
with Bloomberg’s words is that the imagery he referred to already
happened – quite literally and painfully. In American history, Old
West settlers, colonists and others literally took their shotguns
out, and killed Indians, while also harming their cultures and
languages and stealing their lands.
When the conquest was over, they moved on.
Bloomberg and his aides know his words were controversial; they have
seen the protests at City Hall. They have heard from respected
organizations, including the National Congress of American Indians,
which have called for an apology. They have fielded dozens of calls
from reporters who have asked for comment.
Despite the pressure, Bloomberg has not responded. His office has
said his controversial words are not what the situation is about.
Paterson’s office, meanwhile, distanced the governor from the
remarks, saying they “do not reflect” his position.
It is against that backdrop that Obama met with Bloomberg at the
Vineyard Golf Club in Edgartown, Mass., with Native American hope
springing eternal.
Before the four-hour course meeting, officials in Obama’s
administration had been updated on the tribal conflict, lending
credence to the notion that the president could have been briefed
and prepared to ask Bloomberg to rectify his gaffe. The president’s
past commitment, including last year’s White House Tribal Nations
Summit, also inspired hope.
After the round of golf, it quickly became clear that the moment had
passed without attention. When asked if the president brought up the
issue with the mayor, and if he had a position, spokesman Shin
Inouye said the White House would offer “no comment.” The White
House has not issued any statements supporting an apology or other
action.
Pool reporters covering the president were not given access to Obama
and Bloomberg on the day of the meeting, so they were unable to
directly ask them questions regarding the matter. No mainstream
outlets that do have access to the leaders have posed questions
about the controversy to them.
To be fair, the White House and Obama often choose not to weigh in
on a host of controversial issues, especially those involving race.
But not always.
Obama famously waded last summer into the controversy when Harvard
professor Henry Louis “Skip” Gates Jr., who is black, was arrested
by a white police officer at his home. As a result of the
president’s attention, a “beer summit” was later held at the White
House between Gates and the officer who arrested him.
The president said he considered the situation to be a “teachable
moment” that he hoped could improve relations between minorities and
police.
In that case, a reporter from the mainstream media was granted
access to ask Obama the question that led to his support for Gates.
Indian news outlets, no matter the political party in power, have
never been granted access in a similar fashion.
Obama also recently weighed in on the proposed building of a Muslim
mosque at the Ground Zero site in New York City. Despite knowing the
issue was controversial, he supported the idea that a mosque could
be built at the site. Some political observers hailed him for his
willingness to present another “teachable moment” regardless of
political calculation.
In both the Gates and mosque scenarios, the president received flak
from political enemies, and some Democratic supporters said he could
have cost them votes in an election year.
Philip Deloria, an associate dean at the University of Michigan and
Native scholar, said political realities are increasingly
complicating moral issues for Obama, which can be especially
disconcerting for Indians who have faced more than their share of
moral injustices. He said the president is probably quite wary of
presenting another learning lesson – this one centered on an even
smaller minority – given the potential political ramifications.
“From a purely political point of view, Obama should not comment, or
try to make a teachable moment out of any of this stuff. From Skip
Gates to the mosque, these things don’t really play that well for
him,” Deloria said.
“Of course, from a moral or ethical point of view, it would be great
to have a national leader who could weigh in with some gravitas on
issues like this. And I’m not saying I’m representing a tribal point
of view, but one can imagine an even stronger desire to have a
national leader who steps up to the plate and educates the nation on
things like sovereignty and treaty rights.”
Deloria added that Obama has sometimes played into the idea that he
is willing to go to bat for Indians, which is probably why he
sometimes lets certain ones down.
Even given the current political landscape, some said Obama must be
willing to forgo political calculations, especially since Indian
issues tend to be bi-partisan.
“I think it would be very helpful for him to speak out on the
dehumanizing impact of the mascots and stereotyping of Indian and
Native people,” said Eric Eberhard, an Indian law professor with
Seattle University Law School. “I certainly hope that he will find a
time and place to make it plain to everyone that the entire nation
is diminished and dishonored by this kind of talk and behavior from
anyone and particularly from those who are elected to positions of
public trust.”
Robert Williams, director of the Indigenous Peoples Law and Policy
Program at the University of Arizona, said there is a federal trust
responsibility issue at stake as well – an area the president has
said he wants to improve. “The tribes in New York are under
protection of the United States federal government under the
Constitution, and that perhaps is the most important lesson someone
like Mayor Bloomberg needs to be taught by the president of the
United States.”
Williams believes the situation isn’t all that different from when
past presidents, acting on a strong federal interest, faced down
southern governors and racist local law enforcement officials whose
actions and words threatened racial violence against blacks as a
minority group exercising what they thought were their rights under
U.S. law.
Jack Trope, director of the Association on American Indian Affairs,
put the brakes on a bit, saying there is a need for Indians to be
strategic about their requests for presidential intervention. In the
Bloomberg case, he said Obama should “perhaps” weigh in, but he
noted that there are a plethora of other crucial Indian issues that
need desperate attention.
Robert Miller, a legal scholar with the Lewis & Clark Law School,
offered his own thoughts on “teachable moments” – and the missed one
in this instance – saying that perhaps the greatest lesson learned
will belong to Indians.
“We are under the radar, and we have to fight to overcome that. It
should not be okay to slur and slander tribal governments and Indian
peoples without consequences the same as for other groups.”
© 1998 - 2010 Indian
Country Today. All Rights Reserved To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.indiancountry.com