Coal is responsible for about a third of carbon dioxide
emissions and releases double the sulfur dioxide and
nitrogen oxide of other energy sources. With various
state and federal environmental regulations on the
horizon, coal plants have no choice but to make changes.
Reports suggest developing and implementing the
technology to clean carbon and bury it could cost up to
$70 billion. Is it smarter to put that money toward the
cleaner, cheaper option of natural gas and, as the
glitches are ironed out, wind and solar energy?
Copyright © 1996-2010 by
CyberTech,
Inc.
All rights reserved.
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.energycentral.com
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.energybiz.com
|