Rand Paul, the newly elected firebrand Tea Party senator from
Kentucky, is mounting a full-on attack on spending, targeting
what he terms “corporate welfare” as well as taking direct aim
at President Barack Obama’s clean-energy initiatives.
Paul, a Republican, says it’s vital to stick to the GOP campaign
promises of deep, immediate cuts. He proposes $500 billion in
spending reductions that he says won’t touch Social Security or
Medicare.
Top of the list: Tens of billions in spending gone from the
departments of education, agriculture, transportation, energy,
and housing and urban development. He takes on international
aid, Health and Human Services, homeland security, and other
federal agencies, too.
“Consistently labeled for elimination, specifically by House
Republicans during the 1990s, one of (the Department of)
Commerce's main functions is delivering corporate welfare to
American firms that can compete without it,” Paul writes in The
New York Times.
“My proposal would scale back the Commerce Department's spending
by 54 percent and eliminate corporate welfare.”
He singles out the Department of Energy as well, a pet project
of Obama’s and often cited by the president as a potential
source of new jobs in a country facing unemployment consistently
above 9 percent.
“Nearly all forms of energy development here in the U.S. are
subsidized by the federal government, from oil and coal to
nuclear, wind, solar, and biofuels,” Paul writes. “These
subsidies often go to research and companies that can survive
without them. This drives up the cost of energy for all
Americans, both as taxpayers and consumers.”
Not least is defense, where he says spending is up 67 percent
since 2001, even after you subtract the cost of wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan, Paul writes.
Most importantly, the Kentucky Republican contends, it’s time
for Americans to face up to a simple fact: Nothing we do at the
federal level now comes cost-free.
“Is any particular program, whatever its merits, worth borrowing
billions of dollars from foreign nations to finance programs
that could be administered better at the state and local level,
or even taken over by the private sector?” Paul asks.
Paul’s call for a more serious debate on spending, one he seems
to be issuing to both Republicans and Democrats, was echoed in
press interviews with former Sen. Alan Simpson, the
plain-speaking head of Obama’s deficit cutting commission.
Any plan to cut spending that leaves out military spending,
Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security is unserious on the face
of it, Simpson said in televisions interviews over the weekend.
“If you have a career politician get up and say, 'I know we can
get this done; we're going to get rid of all earmarks, all
waste, fraud, and abuse, all foreign aid, Air Force one, all
congressional pensions,' that's a sparrow's belch in the midst
of a typhoon," Simpson told CNN's "State of the Union."
© Moneynews. All rights reserved.