
|
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
James Cahalin is a Senior
Recruitment Consultant at
EnergyCentralJobs.com.
He can be contacted at
303.228.4753 or
james@energycentral.com.
|
|
|
|
|
The Internet has
changed the way the world communicates. The verdict
is still out, however, on whether this change is for
the better or worse. On the upside, digital
technology has introduced new ways to instantly
reach millions of job seekers and research potential
candidates. Sites like LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter,
etc., allow recruiters to discover both professional
and personal information on potential candidates in
minutes. This is a very powerful tool, but it comes
with even greater responsibility.
Researching potential candidates via social
networking presents inherent dangers. LinkedIn,
which I like to refer to as "professional media," is
relatively benign, but Facebook certainly presents
uncharted territory. Recruiters have never had
access to this type of detailed personal information
in the past. Accessing this information can put you
and your company at great risk. So the
million-dollar question for organizations like the
Department of Labor's Office of Federal Contract
Compliance Programs (OFCCP) is: "How should
recruiters handle this?" Is it permissible for
recruiters to research potential candidates via
social media? Is it fair to allow that research to
greatly influence a hiring decision?
Believe it or not, this issue will be a major
problem for the HR community all around the country.
At this point, we are unaware of any legal
precedents; however, it is anticipated that legal
action will take place in the future. In my opinion,
whether and when we'll have laws or even guidelines
is 100 percent voter-related. The political party in
control of Congress will dictate whether and when
this issue is addressed. Democrats might legislate;
Republicans might leave it to the free market. I've
been asked about this very topic by many recruiters
as well as HR directors, and to be honest with you,
I don't know how to answer it. So I thought I would
conduct some research, both professional and
personal, to find out what practices make sense and
which ones place recruiters and their clients at
risk.
At the Independent Energy Human Resources
Association (IEHRA) conference in Chicago this past
October, the question came up repeatedly. The answer
has two sides. For employers, a great deal of
information about a person can be learned from
someone's social media pages. But for job-seekers,
is it fair and ethical if recruiters are going to
make hiring decisions based largely upon what they
do in their personal lives?
Employer
Researching social media sites on potential
candidates can provide insight the previously was
never routinely obtained. You can find out their
favorite music, movies, friends, what they did this
past weekend, where they were, where they are right
now, religious beliefs, political views and
opinions, etc. That is powerful information, and it
is tempting to use it to determine whether they'd be
a good fit with your company's culture. Hiring
managers rightly want to know whether the candidate
is someone they'll be able to work with every day.
Is the fact that they are a closet Air Supply* fan
going to affect the candidate's ability to do the
job? How about the fact that the candidate roots for
your sports team's arch rival? Personally, I have
posted movie quotes without attribution in the past,
some of which could be read in a very negative light
when being read without context — Jim Carrey movies,
especially. A friend of mine recently posted a quote
from the character Cosmo Kramer from the 1990s
sitcom
Seinfeld about a certain type of
gin. Non-Seinfeld fans would not understand that
quote and might think that that person really enjoys
a "no-smell, no-tell brand of gin."
What if a candidate writes his or her own blog? A
completely personal blog can seriously influence a
hiring decision. Everything you find out through
social media can be insightful, but using it also
could represent a violation of ethical practices.
Job Seekers
Applicants have always separated their personal
personas from their professional agendas, but
today's multisource information stream blends the
two. I agree when you say that your love for Celine
Dion's recording, "My Heart Will Go On"* should in
no way affect a possible job. Your social media
pages should not affect a hiring decision in any
way. The reality, however, is the opposite. This
point also pertains to applications for student
admission to institutions of higher education.
Admissions officers don't necessarily want to see
photos of their potential students protesting campus
policies, for instance. You can hurt your cause by
making your dislikes public.
The age of social media is upon us, and it's not
going away. It will evolve, it will get bigger, and
it will become more prevalent in people's everyday
lives. Many who are active on Facebook have friends
who are habitual posters — you might be one
yourself. I'm sure some recruiters have researched a
few candidates' Twitter feeds, MySpace or Facebook
pages. Using social media often just exposes your
own predilections and prejudices. Also, a
candidate's personal preferences probably do not
reflect their likelihood of success in a given job.
So my advice to you is: TRUST YOUR INSTINCTS! Your
gut feeling on a potential hire is way more
important than the fact that you are a Red Sox fan
while the candidate loves the Yankees. You just
never know unless you are personally acquainted with
that person. Typically, recruiters aren't that close
with potential hires.
Be sure to use your head! EVERYTHING you put out on
the Internet is discoverable. Use common sense. I
hear about people getting fired because of their
social media posts all the time. I guess I should be
sympathetic, but if you are "friends" with your boss
and you post something like: "I hate my job!" how
sorry should I feel for you if you get fired?
Recruiters, for the most part, are experts at
writing advanced search strings which they can adapt
to search engines such as Google, Yahoo or Bing. If
you put it on the Internet, they can find it. This,
I promise you.
Recruiters
Get back to the basics. Schedule phone interviews so
you have a voice to base your judgments on. Trust
your instincts; they are typically correct. Stop
relying on technology so much during the hiring
process. Use it as a tool, but not as the decision
maker. Also, protect your company. Violations, fines
or possible lawsuits on discriminatory hiring
practices are possible and could also very well crop
up retroactively. There is no real guideline or set
of rules in place and it might just take a lawsuit
to get one in place. Document why you didn't extend
an offer to candidate A. Your statement that the
candidate's Facebook page was the reason would not
be appropriate to document.
A personal note to parents: Remember that many
teenagers lack common sense and don't look into the
future past next weekend. Check their pages and make
sure they're not negatively prejudicing their future
— especially with photos. Universities are using
social media as a way to base decisions on
admittance.
Obviously, the jury is still out on all of these
issues, and the foregoing advice doesn't answer my
question about what is and what is not allowed.
Precisely because there are no rules and you can't
stop a recruiter from looking at your social media
pages, job applicants should exercise good judgment.
There is no real way to prove that your social media
pages had a negative influence on a recruiter you're
trying to impress. As for the recruiters, don't be
judgmental with regard to social media pages.
Remember that pretty much everything on those pages
is easily taken out of context. Professional media
pages are a much better tool in your recruiting
practices than social media pages. Again, social
media is here for the long haul. You can use it as a
tool to assist you, but at the same time, it has the
potential to negatively impact your life. Whatever
happens, the onus is on you. So use your head and
trust your gut!
*Please note that the names of universities,
artists and sports teams were used for example
purposes only and the use in no way reflects the
positive or negative views or opinions of the author
and EnergyCentralJobs.com.
Please
click here to view this article online.
You may also search out other articles written
specifically to HR Managers.
EnergyCentralJobs.com