Senator urges White House to assess economic impact of GHG rules

Washington (Platts)--28Feb2011/533 pm EST/2233 GMT

US Senator Sherrod Brown Monday asked the White House to assess the economic impacts of federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions on the electric power sector and manufacturing and explore a settlement with energy-intensive industries.

The Ohio Democrat has long championed the concerns of heavy industry during congressional attempts to cap GHG emissions and maintains that a collaborative approach would help keep US manufacturers competitive.

President Barack Obama in January called for a government-wide review of rules and regulations to ensure they were promoting economic growth while protecting public health and safety.

"As part of the review process, I urge you to include an assessment of the economic repercussions and potential unintended consequences of the greenhouse gas regulation on manufacturers, farmers, electric power generators, and our nation's economy as a whole," Brown wrote the president.

Using its authority under the Clean Air Act, the US Environmental Protection Agency issued GHG permit regulations for new and modified electric generation units on January 2 and plans to impose performance standards on existing power plants and oil refineries by May 2012.

Brown said these rules must be reconsidered amid concerns about their unintended consequences that could "undermine" the objectives of reducing GHG emissions and boosting economic growth.

Brown said "a comprehensive strategy of investments and well-defined incentives can drive innovation and encourage long-term investments much needed by manufacturers and industry."

The senator pointed to the agreement achieved last year between the US Environmental Protection Agency and the auto industry in drafting final rules to regulate GHG from new model cars and light trucks and achieve higher fuel economy standards.

"It makes sense to explore similar opportunities with other industries," Brown wrote. "I believe that through collaborative approaches like these, we can reduce greenhouse gas emissions, save consumers money, and address our dependence on foreign oil."

Neither industry nor environmental groups said work on such a settlement was underway.

"We're always talking with industries, but I don't know of a specific parallel in the offing," said David Doniger, the Natural Resources Defense Council's climate change policy director.

The National Association of Manufacturers declined to "speculate" on a possible settlement. "We remain very concerned with the regulations coming out of the EPA and on how they will impact manufacturers," NAM spokesman Jeff Ostermayer said.

--Cathy Cash, cathy_cash@platts.com

To subscribe or visit go to:  http://www.platts.com

 The McGraw-Hill Companies