Senate Republicans Agree to End Big Oil Subsidies After Watching
Polar Bear Film

In an stunning reversal, Senate Republicans have accepted President
Obama's call to end tax breaks for the oil and gas industry, reversing a
procedural vote on Thursday that had killed the Mendendez Bill (S. 2204
- Repeal Subsidies and Tax Breaks for the Big 5 Oil Companies),
introduced by Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ). On Thursday, the bill was
defeated by a vote of 51-47, nine votes short of the 60 required to
pass.
But in a rare Saturday afternoon session called by Senate Majority
Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), the measure was swiftly rejuvenated—and
passed—after nine of the Republicans who voted against the bill on
Thursday had a change of heart after watching a sneak preview on Friday
of To the Arctic, a documentary that follows the life of a mother polar
bear caring for her two seven-month-old cubs in the Arctic. Narrated by
three-time Oscar winner Meryl Streep, To the Arctic arrives in IMAX
theaters on April 20.
The surprise passage of the bill puts the Senate more in line with a
majority of the American people when it comes to big oil. A CNN/ORC poll
taken last week found that 55 percent of Americans believe that oil
companies deserve "a great deal of blame" for the recent increase in gas
prices. The majority of Congressional Republicans have consistently
voted against ending fossil fuel subsidies, which is unsurprising,
considering that many Republican lawmakers receive contributions from
and invest in the oil and gas industry. But with Saturday's abrupt
turnaround, that is likely to change as well.
Scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey believe that upwards of 50
billion barrels of oil lie within the continental shelf off the coast of
Alaska, in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas. But these are still unproven
reservoirs. For comparison, Saudi Arabia has a proven 260 billion
barrels.
One of the main concerns about drilling there is that the Arctic is a
fragile ecosystem, with an ice shelf that is rapidly melting due to
anthropogenic climate change, a factor that is harming much of the
wildlife in the region, particularly the endangered polar bear, which
needs the ice to hunt and rear young. Environmentalists and
conservationists have long argued that oil drilling in Arctic would push
the polar bear to extinction.
POLAR BEARS' NEWEST ALLIES: SENATE
REPUBLICANS
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) was one of the nine Republican senators who
voted against the bill on Thursday, and then had an about-face after
seeing the tragic plight of the polar bears in To the Arctic.
"I was deeply touched by this story of this polar bear family's struggle
to survive in a frigid environment of melting ice," Cornyn said. "They
may be polar bears, but their desire to live is no less powerful than
ours. And I realized that instead of drilling in their fragile habitat,
we need to preserve it. And giving more taxpayer handouts to oil
companies that want to destroy the Arctic is not the answer."
It is a dramatic change of heart from a politician who has received over
$2 million in campaign contributions from the oil and gas industry—the
most of any senator.[5] His office issued a brief statement on Saturday
saying that Cornyn has already spoken with the World Wildlife Fund
(WWF), offering to be a spokesperson in support of their efforts to save
the polar bear.[6]
"We couldn't be more thrilled to have Senator Corwyn on board our
campaign to save the polar bear," said Carter Roberts, CEO of the WWF.
"There is no better spokesperson than someone who switched sides for
ethical reasons." Roberts said that Cornyn even offered to wear a polar
bear suit at the next meeting of the Subcommittee on Energy, Natural
Resources, and Infrastructure, on which the senator is the minority
ranking member.
SENATOR MCCONNELL: DEFEND THE ARCTIC FROM FUTURE OIL AND GAS
DRILLING
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who is the
second-highest recipient in the Senate of contributions from the oil and
gas industry, with over $1.5 million, also had a change of heart after
seeing the film.
"The polar bear is an American icon," said McConnell, soon after voting
yea in Saturday's re-vote.
"But it's getting much more difficult for a polar bear mother and her
cubs to survive in the harsh Arctic," he said, fighting back tears.
"Every new day she has to travel farther to find food because the sea
ice she needs to hunt is quickly melting from global warming. Her hungry
cubs face starvation on a regular basis. And now, because of our
addiction to oil, she has to deal with the prospect of an oil spill?
It's not right. It's not moral. And I'm calling on all Americans,
Democrats and Republicans, to take a stand to defend the Arctic from
future oil and gas drilling. If we're going to subsidize any energy, it
must be clean, renewable and respect the environment."
McConnell's office released a statement saying the senator will be
offering his considerable political clout to support Greenpeace's
efforts to protect the Arctic and bring the message to a new audience.
NORTH POLE: A NEW "GLOBAL COMMONS"?
"Our goal is to permanently ban oil drilling and industrial fishing in
the Arctic and to establish the area around the North Pole as a 'global
commons,'" said Dan Howells, Deputy Campaign Director of Greenpeace USA.
"And now that we have Senator McConnell's support, this ambitious plan
can sooner become a reality. In 1991, a Greenpeace campaign much like
this one helped establish Antarctica as a world park and off limits to
commercial extraction. We did it before, we can do it again."[7]
While ending subsidies to the oil and gas industry signals an important
shift on Capitol Hill, such handouts only represent a small fraction of
Big Oil's operational budgets for the extraction, refinement and
distribution of dirty fossil fuel. "Cutting $2.4 billion in subsidies
annually to the biggest companies—BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips,
ExxonMobil and Shell—might seem like a solid initial step," said Karen
Showalter of Oil Change International, a Washington, DC-based clean
energy advocacy group. "But it's just the tip of the iceberg. The oil
and gas industry receives at least $10 billion annually in special
favors."[8]
But now, polar bears are going to be getting some favored treatment of
their own, thanks to some high-ranking Republicans who were touched by
the story of one family, struggling to survive in one of the Earth's
harshest environments.
###
NOTES
[1] Cohen, Tom and Alan Silverleib.
Senate Republicans reject Obama call to end 'big oil' tax breaks.
March 29, 2012. Accessed March 31, 2012.
[2] MacGillivray Freeman Films.
IMAX - To the Arctic. November 1, 2010. Accessed March 31, 2012.
[3] CNN/ORC poll.
Interviews with 1,014 adult Americans conducted by telephone by ORC
International on March 24-25, 2012. Accessed March 31, 2012.
[4] CNBC.
Polar Bears vs. Oil. January 28, 2008. Accessed March 31, 2012.
[5] Oil Change International.
Dirty Energy Money Campaign: John Cornyn. February 8, 2012. Accessed
March 31, 2012.
[6] World Wildlife Fund.
Polar Bear: World's Largest Land Carnivore. September 29, 2011.
Accessed March 31, 2012.
[7] Howells, Dan.
Greenpeace Email: Polar Bear Cubs Won't Stand a Chance. March 26,
2012. Accessed March 31, 2012.
[8] Showalter, Karen.
Senate Fails to Cut Favors to Big Oil, Once Again. March 29, 2012.
Accessed March 31, 2012.
image: Polar bear and cubs (United States Fish and Wildlife Service,
Wikimedia Commons)
Polar bear image via Shutterstock.
Article originally published at
Justmeans.
|