Appeals court keeps anti-coal measure off Bellingham ballot
Aug 29 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - John Stark The
Bellingham Herald (Bellingham, Wash.)
It's official: The initiative attempting to prohibit coal
shipments through Bellingham will not be on the ballot in
November.
In a brief opinion issued Monday, Aug. 27, the Washington
Court of Appeals upheld an Aug. 3 decision from Whatcom County
Superior Court Judge Charles Snyder, who found that the
anti-coal ordinance and Community Bill of Rights proposed by the
Coal-Free Bellingham group could not withstand post-election
legal scrutiny, and would be misleading to voters if they were
put on the ballot.
Stoney Bird, a Coal-Free Bellingham organizer and spokesman,
said the group would issue a statement on the Appeals Court
action on Wednesday, Aug. 29.
After hearing legal arguments from both sides on Aug. 3,
Snyder granted the city of Bellingham an injunction blocking the
anti-coal measures from the ballot, even though supporters
gathered about 10,000 signatures -- more than double the number
they needed to meet the legal requirement for presenting the
measure to city voters
The proposed ordinance banning coal shipments through the
city seemed to go well beyond the city's legal authority under
state and federal law. City attorneys advised the City Council
to seek the injunction to avoid further legal headaches, and the
council unanimously agreed, setting the stage for Snyder's
action.
Coal-Free Bellingham organizers and their attorney, Breean
Beggs, asked the Appeals Court for an emergency stay of Snyder's
injunction. In a one-sentence ruling, the higher court denied
that request:
"A majority of the (appeals court) panel having determined
that said motion should be denied because the trial court
(Snyder) did not err in concluding that City of Bellingham
initiative 2012-2 exceeds the legislative authority of the city
of Bellingham and thus its initiative power; now, therefore, it
is hereby ordered that appellants' motion for emergency stay be
... denied."
The Appeals Court ruling came just one day before the
printing deadline for ballot materials for the Nov. 6 general
election.
Coal-Free Bellingham mounted the petition drive in reaction
to SSA Marine's plan for a coal export terminal at Cherry Point,
at a site between the BP Cherry Point refinery and the Alcoa
Intalco Works aluminum smelter. If that project survives
regulatory review, coal from Montana and Wyoming mines would be
shipped through Bellingham by rail, to be loaded onto ships for
export to Asia.
That prospect has spurred widespread concern about the impact
on the city. Opponents cite issues that include global warming,
coal dust, diesel emissions, and delays at railroad crossings.
Rail and coal company officials say the concerns are
overblown. Although the coal is carried in open cars, the loads
would be treated with a spray that minimizes dust problems,
according to spokesmen for Peabody Energy, which has announced
its intention to use the Cherry Point terminal if it is built.
Reach JOHN STARK at john.stark@bellinghamherald.com or call
715-2274.