But Lighting up in China
Some coal plants here are going dark but overseas
they are lighting up. Akron, Ohio-based
FirstEnergy’s planned closure of six coal-fired
units is expected to start a trend -- one that will
see the oldest and dirtiest such facilities laid to
rest.
Like all utilities that own and operate coal-fired
fleets, FirstEnergy had a choice: To retire or to
retrofit its plants given the range of rules to take
effect -- everything involving mercury, coal ash and
greenhouse gases. The company concluded that it
would be cheaper to just shutter by September the
inefficient and under-used plants, which amounts to
about 10 percent of the electricity it burns.
But FirstEnergy operates in states that have
restructured electricity markets: Its prices are
driven in part by supply and demand, not what
regulators say it can or cannot earn. With less
electricity to bid into the system, it then puts a
higher value on what it can offer.
A Wall Street Journal story quotes several
analysts who say that price per megawatt could
nearly double from its current value of $126.
“We recently completed a comprehensive review of our
coal-fired generating plants and determined that
additional investments to implement (the mercury
rule) and other environmental rules would make these
older plants even less likely to be dispatched under
market rules,” says James Lash, president of
FirstEnergy Generation. “As a result, it was
necessary to retire the plants rather than continue
operations.” The company currently owns 17 coal
plants that are located in Ohio, Pennsylvania and
Maryland.
Coal now provides about half of this country’s
electric generation. But the energy picture is
changing with the pending environmental rules and
the newfound wealth of inexpensive shale gas here.
Black & Veatch is predicting that coal’s share of
the market could fall by as much as half over the
next 25 years while natural gas’ slice would double
from its 20 percent share today. Its calculations
are driven in some measure by an expectation of
increased greenhouse gas regulations.
Lighting up Overseas
While U.S. utilities that burn coal are becoming
increasingly challenged to find newer and cleaner
sources of energy, those in China and other parts of
the developing world are hungry for more. Therefore,
coal producers here will find that international
markets potentially more lucrative.
“Politically, it is a win-win for the government if
it uses natural gas to produce power here while
quietly selling coal elsewhere,” says Ken Green,
scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.
“Government gets lease and tax revenues here while
also reducing local air pollution levels and
greenhouse gas emissions at home.”
According to
China’s National Development and Reform Commission,
the country’s coal imports rose by nearly 11 percent
in 2011 to 182 million tons. That makes it the
world’s largest importer of coal. It is also
producing and consuming more at home as well, or an
11 percent increase from 2010 to 2011. That demand
is helping to raise coal prices.
For their part, coal organizations are saying that
the shift in market fundamentals is harmful to both
utilities and their customers. That’s because the
combined regulatory costs would be the most
expensive that have ever been enacted.
The American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity,
which funded a study by the National Economic
Research Associates, says that 1.4 million jobs
would be lost while electricity rates would rise by
23 percent, all by 2020. Less demand for coal would
mean more need for natural gas, which would see its
prices rise too.
“We will meet the Environmental Protection Agency
rules but we will need a little more time,” says
David Owens, an executive vice president at the
Edison Electric Institute. Owens adds that the
emergence of shale gas is a game-changer but he
cautions that an over-reliance on it could have
adverse consequences.
While the industry is hoping for delay, action will
ultimately be inevitable. Standard & Poor's says
that a third of coal plants are working to comply.
But two-thirds of them in the United States are
older than 30 years and must either be retired or
retrofitted. The older and smaller facilities are
better candidates to be retired while the newer and
bigger coal plants might be more easily modernized.
FirstEnergy’s experience is indicative of that
thinking. And while coal will remain vital, its
significance will gradually decline here. Its
importance overseas, conversely, is expected
escalate as developing countries grow.
EnergyBiz Insider is the Winner of the 2011 Online
Column category awarded by Media Industry News, MIN.
Ken Silverstein has also been named one of the Top
Economics Journalists by Wall Street Economists.
Follow Ken on www.twitter.com/ken_silverstein
energybizinsider@energycentral.com
Copyright © 1996-2011 by
CyberTech,
Inc.
All rights reserved.
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.energycentral.com
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.energybiz.com