Senator James Inhofe, R-Okla., Ranking Member of
the Senate Committee on Environment and Public
Works, came out swinging in a floor speech June 18
ahead of a scheduled June 20 vote on his proposal to
kill the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s
Utility Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT)
rule, also known as the Mercury and Air Toxics
Standards (MATS).
Inhofe urged his colleagues to join him in his
effort to put an end to President Barack Obama's
“war on coal” just after Obama announced that he
would veto the measure if it were to pass.
Said Inhofe in his prepared remarks for his floor
speech: “Mr. President, as you know the Senate will
take up a vote this week on my resolution, SJR 37,
to stop the Environmental Protection Agency's
Utility MACT rule, which is the centerpiece of
President Obama's war on coal. As we look ahead to
this vote, it's clear that there is a coordinated
effort between the White House and Congressional
Democrats to paint our efforts to stop an out of
control EPA as extreme. This is breaking news:
President Obama just issued a statement this
afternoon that he will veto my resolution if it
passes.”
Just before that announcement from the White House,
Representatives Ed Markey and Henry Waxman came out
with a new report detailing what Waxman has called
the "most anti-environmental" House of
Representatives in history, Inhofe noted. “I'd like
to remind my Democratic friends that 19 House
Democrats supported companion legislation in the
House to stop the Utility MACT rule, and numerous
Democrats and even unions have sent letters in
support of my resolution, so it's not just
Republicans whose constituents are feeling the pain
of EPA's regulations,” Inhofe added.
"To my Democrat friends in the House, I beg to
differ: it's not that this Congress is
anti-environmental; it's that this EPA is the most
radical EPA in history, aggressive to the point that
even the left leaning Washington Post has called out
the agency for ‘earning a reputation for abuse,’" he
says.
Inhofe later added: “What is this effort really
about? It's about one thing only: killing coal
- and killing coal is the centerpiece of their
radial global warming agenda. Remember then-Senator
Obama said that he voted against the health benefits
in Clear Skies because he thought ‘global warming
was critical.’
In other words, global warming was more important
than any considerations regarding health.
Importantly, the Senate will take this vote on my
resolution just as world leaders gather in Rio for
the Rio+20 Sustainable Development Conference.”
Inhofe said that in large part, that Rio
conference is about facilitating a wealth transfer
from wealthy to poor countries in the guise of
sustainable development.
Cassell is chief of coal generation for
Generation Hub, an Energy Central

Copyright © 1996-2012 by
CyberTech,
Inc.
All rights reserved.
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.energycentral.com
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.energybiz.com