With the presidential campaign headed down the
final stretch, it is expected that the two main
candidates will slow up. What? While their slugfest
will remain in high gear, their highly toxic
rhetoric will begin to ease as they seek to woo the
independent and moderate voters.
It will be a softer message aimed at both coal and
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which has
been the punching bag for the right and the go-to
guy for the left that has unable to get its agenda
through Congress. Each side has riled up its base as
much as can be expected. Now, it’s time to go after
the center -- the place where the election will
actually get decided.
As such, President Obama is playing up his “clean
coal” agenda while Governor Romney is discussing a
slow-down in regulations to stimulate economic
growth. The question among onlookers is whether the
former Massachusetts governor would balance the
needs of businesses with the desire for a healthy
environment or whether his responses to all such
issues would be dogmatic and automatic.
Both candidates, for instance, are trying to win the
battleground states of Colorado, Ohio and Virginia.
All, notably, have a significant coal mining
presence. It’s why the president has toned down his
talk of the harmful effects of older coal-fired
electric generation and turned instead to discussing
his administration’s funding of advanced coal
technologies that include carbon capture and burial.
Advertisements, meantime, have pounded Romney over
his flip-flops, pointing out his one-time support of
carbon caps and calling coal plants “killers.” He
has responded with his own attacks, noting Vice
President Biden’s comments in 2007 that more people
die from dirty coal units than from terrorist
attacks, although this is not something from which
the vice president is running. But would Romney take
a more judicious approach to executing laws if
elected?
“I’d hope he’d go back to the way he was as governor
of Massachusetts,” says Christine Todd Whitman,
administrator of the EPA under George Bush II, in an
interview with
Politico. “Because in that position, he was
finding the balance that can be struck between
environmental protection and economic growth because
it’s not a zero-sum game.”
Changing Tactics
Romney can play to the Republican base all he wants.
But the reality is that, if elected, he would have
to groom members of Congress. He can’t wave a magic
wand and pass legislation or roll back the
regulatory clock. It’s a grand exercise in
compromise -- unless he would prefer to make
political points and go home with nothing to show.
House Republicans, for example, are using
descriptive terms when they refer to the EPA,
calling it a “job-killing” machine. But despite all
of their efforts to reverse key regs such as those
on greenhouse gases and mercury, they have failed.
And with each occurrence, they are losing
negotiating power, along with those industries that
are helping to bankroll the efforts.
When a federal agency issues a new regulation, it is
because Congress has given it such authorization. If
Romney chooses, he could continue to engage in a
highly partisan war of words. But if he wants to
lead and to mold public policy, he should instead
enjoin the protagonists. While both sides may
squirm, they would ultimately shake hands.
Consider a report issued by the Senate Democrats: It
gives an historical account of how environmental
regulations have enjoyed bipartisan support. It
notes that the impartial Office of Management Budget
reviewed 10 major EPA rules and it concluded that
the benefits of those regulations have outweighed
the costs by a factor of 7.
More importantly, the free market winds are blowing
much stronger than the regulatory gales. Simply,
natural gas is the best fuel option for utilities
right now. And if competing energy sources want a
greater share of that business, they need to improve
their processes -- not try to vilify other
technologies or reverse 40 years of environmental
progress. That includes both coal and green energy.
The candidates must stay true to those who granted
them their respective nominations. But they must
also try to unite a deeply wounded nation.
November’s winner must be a statesman, necessitating
that both Obama and Romney broaden their appeal and
start changing their political tactics.
EnergyBiz Insider has been awarded the Gold for
Original Web Commentary presented by the American
Society of Business Press Editors. The column is
also the Winner of the 2011 Online Column category
awarded by Media Industry News, MIN. Ken Silverstein
has been named one of the Top Economics Journalists
by Wall Street Economists.
Twitter: @Ken_Silverstein
energybizinsider@energycentral.com
Copyright © 1996-2012 by
CyberTech,
Inc.
All rights reserved.
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.energycentral.com
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.energybiz.com