During the 19th century voters -- only white adult males -- were
organized as paramilitary units. The Wide Awakes, affiliated
with the Republicans, would march off to vote in a torch light
parade.
American elections have often been defined by who is
not allowed to vote.
Two days before the Declaration of Independence, for example
the New Jersey Constitution declared that all residents “who are
worth fifty pounds” could vote. (That included women and African
Americans, but by 1807 that line was rewritten so that only
white men were eligible.)
During the 19th century voters – again, only white adult
males – were often organized into paramilitary units. The Wide
Awakes, affiliated with the Republicans, would march off to vote
in a torch light parade.
After the civil war that franchise was extended, slowly,
state by state, to all males.
But in April 1880
John Elk presented himself to a county official in Omaha,
Nebraska, and attempted to register to vote. The clerk
“designedly, corruptly, willfully, and maliciously, did then and
there refuse to register this plaintiff, for the sole reason
that the plaintiff was an Indian, and therefore not a citizen of
the United States, and not therefore entitled to vote.”
On the next day Elk went to the polls anyway. The same clerk
was a judge and again refused to give Elk a ballot.
Eventually the Supreme Court agreed. It basically said that
Elk had been born an Indian, therefore was not a citizen, and
could not vote. He owed his “immediate allegiance to” his tribe,
not the United States, the court said.
Congress supposedly fixed that in 1924 when it passed the
Citizenship Act. But that was a Washington, D.C. idea – and
states continued to deny American Indians and Alaska Natives the
right to vote. South Dakota, Idaho, Maine, Mississippi, New
Mexico, Utah and Arizona all found legal loopholes to prevent
Native Americans from voting until as late as 1962. The civil
rights movement, and stricter federal oversight during the 1960s
and 1970s, increased access for Native American voters. (The
National Congress of American Indians’
Native Vote project has the goal of this election turning
out the largest Native vote in history.)
All of this history builds into the storyline for the 2012
election. This cycle there has been a determined and steady call
to restrict voting participation across the country. The battle
to register people to vote is more complicated, partly because
it now includes early voting and other methods to engage more
people in the process.
Early voting has become a routine for many voters, nearly one
third of the ballots cast in 2008, and as much as half this time
around. It’s convenient and especially easy for rural people,
such as those on reservations, because it reduces transportation
issues.
Tribes in Montana filed a voting rights suit last week to
press for early voting opportunities in that state.
But while early voting, and indeed, access to voting should
be non-partisan, it’s not. Republicans have led the charge to
limit access to the polls using a variety of methods from
requiring identification to ending early voting.
In Ohio, for example, the Republican Secretary of State was
blunt. He said early voting was an advantage for Democrats. He
wrote: “After talking with election officials across the state,
I have decided to level the playing field on voting days and
hours during the absentee period in order to ensure that the
Presidential Election in Ohio will be uniform, accessible for
all, fair, and secure.”
A level playing field that restricts voting? But early voting
is popular in Ohio (and where ever it’s open). People like being
able to pop by a poll whenever it’s convenient for them. One
study found that early voters “tend to have lower income than
election-day voters” with the difference “most noticeable among
people with annual incomes of less than $35,000.” In other
words: People who have a tough time leaving work, or school, and
voting on a set schedule.
Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court
ruling that struck down Ohio’s limits to early voting. The
Secretary of State has
asked the Supreme Court to review the case. And quickly.
Think Progress, a liberal website, said there is urgency
because of polls that show early voters are far more inclined to
pick Obama. One recent poll showed that 60 percent of Obama
voters had already cast ballots, compared to 39 percent for
Romney.
In Pennsylvania there is a
similar fight over a strict voter ID law, but a court also
struck down that law as well as one in
South Carolina. More than 30 states have some requirements
to show identification at the polls, and many, such as Idaho,
now incorporate tribal IDs into that requirement.
A
voting rights group in Minnesota is trying to educate Native
American voters about ID laws. “I use my voice and my vote to
stand up for future generations,” says one of the voices on the
video spot. That state has a measure on the ballot to require ID
in future elections.
An election that will once again define who can’t vote.
Mark Trahant is a writer, speaker and Twitter poet. He is
a member of the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes and lives in Fort Hall,
Idaho. He has been writing about Indian Country for more than
three decades. His e-mail is:
marktrahant@thecedarsgroup.org.