Proposal 3 battle over renewable energy costs millions

The Gratiot County Wind project sits near Breckenridge. Voters in November will decide on Proposal 3, a proposal that would put an energy mandate in the state constitution. For The Oakland Press/MARK RANZENBERGER

Voters in November will decide whether to put a strong requirement for renewable energy into Michigan’s highest law.

Proposal 3 would enshrine in Michigan’s Constitution a requirement that a full 25 percent of Michigan’s electricity be produced by “clean, renewable electric energy sources.” Such sources could include wind energy, solar energy, hydroelectric power and biomass fuels.

A “yes” vote would put the mandate into the Constitution. A “no” vote would keep it out.

The measure is opposed by the state’s two largest electric utility companies.

It’s backed primarily by a group calling itself Michigan Energy Michigan Jobs (mi
energymijobs.com), a coalition of environmental, union, alternative energy and business interests. Its biggest backer, according to campaign finance statements, is a San Francisco-based organization called the Green Tech Action Fund.

That fund is affiliated with a group called the Energy Foundation, which says its goals are “advancing new energy technologies that enable economic growth with dramatically less pollution.”

Among the groups listed as its partners are the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Kresge Foundation, and the David and Lucille Packard Foundation.

The Green Tech Action Fund has given Michigan Energy Michigan Jobs $1.34 million, more than half the $2.2 million raised by the supporters.

Michigan campaign finance law puts no limits on the amount of money an individual donor may give a ballot committee.

http://www.theoaklandpress.com/articles/2012/10/08/news/local_news/doc50720f0b57103323670696.txt?viewmode=default

Continued...