The Latest Sneak Attacks in a Coordinated Effort to Eliminate
Vaccine Exemptions
September 18 2012
By Dr. Mercola
The featured article in the latest newsletter from Children's
Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) gets straight to the point with
its headline:1
Back to School – Is the Child Sitting Next to Yours Immunized?
The article goes on to berate vaccine exemption options and
parents who use personal belief exemptions to opt-out of
vaccines for their children. It stops short of ordering parents
to march into their children's classrooms and demand to know
who's vaccinated and who's not (health privacy laws prevent that
anyway).
It peppers you with enough scare tactics – along with links
to information on vaccine exemptions and states that allow
personal belief exemptions – to leave readers convinced they
need to do something to stop vaccine exemptions.
All across the United States, people are fighting for their
right to choose not to be injected with vaccines against their
will, and this is just the latest tactic in a coordinated effort
aimed at eliminating all vaccine exemptions.
The Gates Foundation is even funding surveillance of
anti-vaccine groups. Seth C. Kalichman, professor at the
Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut recently
received a $100,000 grant to establish an Anti-Vaccine
Surveillance and Alert System.
The intention is to "establish an internet-based global
monitoring and rapid alert system for finding, analyzing, and
counteracting misinformation communication campaigns
regarding vaccines to support global immunization efforts,"
GreenMedInfo.com reports.2
My strong guess is that some of the best sources for truthful
information like
NVIC.org and this web site have already been targeted by the
Gates Foundation.
In light of that, it's not surprising that vaccine groups are
trying to turn citizens against each other in an effort to
squelch opposition and free will on this matter. According to
CHOP:
"...these decisions, often referred to as personal
belief exemptions, have been traced to recent cases of
pertussis, measles and mumps in several states. Currently,
20 states allow personal belief exemptions.
Many people do not realize that these choices put not
only their own children at risk, but also those around them
because the more people in a community who are immune to a
disease, the lower the chance that the disease will spread
throughout the community. This is called herd immunity. So,
even those who may not be immune will have a decreased
chance of getting the disease."
First of all, there are only 18 states – not 20 – that allow
personal belief, philosophical or conscientious belief
exemptions to vaccination, in addition to 48 states that allow
religious belief exemptions. To find out which non-medical
vacine exemptions are allowed in your state laws, look at a map
of states and get a copy of your state vaccine requirements on
NVIC's website at:
www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx
Unvaccinated Population Falsely Blamed for Ineffective Vaccines
Recent disease outbreaks were traced back to personal belief
exemptions... Really?
That's just not reality, and if you take the time to look
into the truthfulness of that statement, you'll see it simply
does not hold up. Many outbreaks of pertussis (whooping cough),
measles, and mumps have occurred primarily in people who
were vaccinated, and no one seems to be able to
fully explain how that is the fault of those who are
unvaccinated...
If the vaccine theory was correct, these people should have
been protected because they were vaccinated. Published studies
into the outbreaks have revealed that a lot of the blame should
be placed on ineffective vaccines – not on the
unvaccinated minority.
Consider the following findings about the last two
whooping cough (pertussis) outbreaks.
In 2010, the largest outbreak of whooping cough in over 50
years occurred in California. Around that same time, a scare
campaign was launched in California by Pharma-funded medical
trade associations, state health officials and national media,
targeting people opting out of receiving pertussis vaccine,
falsely accusing them of causing the outbreak.
However, research published in March of this year3
shows that 81 percent of 2010 California whooping cough cases in
people under the age of 18 occurred in those who were fully up
to date on the whooping cough vaccine. Eleven percent had
received at least one shot, but not the entire recommended
series, and only eight percent of those stricken were
unvaccinated.
According to the authors:
"This first detailed analysis of a recent North
American pertussis outbreak found widespread disease among
fully vaccinated older children. Starting
approximately three years after prior vaccine dose, attack
rates markedly increased, suggesting inadequate protection
or durability from the acellular vaccine."
[Emphasis mine]
B. pertussis whooping cough is a cyclical disease with
natural increases that tend to occur every 4-5 years, no matter
how high the vaccination rate is in a population using DPT/DTaP
or Tdap vaccines on a widespread basis. Whole cell DPT vaccines
used in the U.S. from the 1950's until the late 1990's were
estimated to be 63 to 94 percent effective and studies showed
that vaccine-acquired immunity fell to about 40 percent after
seven years.
In the study cited above, the researchers noted the vaccine's
effectiveness was only 41 percent among 2- to 7-year-olds and a
dismal 24 percent among those aged 8-12. With this shockingly
low rate of DTaP vaccine effectiveness, the questionable
solution public health officials have come up with is to declare
that everybody has to get three primary shots and
three follow-up booster shots in order to get long-lasting
protection4
– and that's provided the vaccine gives you any protection at
all!
The Washington State Secretary of Health also declared a
pertussis epidemic on April 3, 2012, in response to a 1,300
percent increase in pertussis cases compared to 2011.5
Scientists are now considering adding a seventh
inoculation6,
in order to boost protection against whooping cough.
"New research confirms the whooping cough vaccine is
failing at a higher rate than expected, and scientists are
considering adding a seventh dose to the national
immunization schedule published by the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention. Two recent studies8
have found the majority of people getting sick are up to
date with their immunizations."
Mumps and Measles Vaccines are Also Failing
Mumps: In 2010, more than 1,000 people
in New Jersey and New York were also sickened with mumps. In
the US, children typically receive their mumps vaccination
as part of the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) vaccine.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
advises children to receive their first dose between 12 and
18 months, and their second between the ages of 4 and 6.
This vaccine is supposed to improve immunity to measles,
mumps and rubella… yet 77 percent of the 1,000+ who came
down with mumps were vaccinated. Similarly, in 2006, when
mumps infected more than 6,500 people in the United States,
cases occurred primarily among college students who had
received two doses of MMR vaccine. At that time, just about
the only people who were truly immune to mumps were older
Americans who had recovered from mumps as children, and
therefore had received natural, lifelong immunity.
Measles – The 1989 measles epidemic in
the region of Quebec was largely attributed to incomplete
vaccination coverage – until a study9
into the outbreak disclosed that the outbreak occurred in a
population that had 99 percent vaccination
coverage. The researchers concluded that: "Incomplete
vaccination coverage is not a valid explanation for the
Quebec City measles outbreak."
Conflicts of Interest – Not Science – Influence Most Vaccine
Recommendations
The CHOP newsletter is delivered by email periodically to
anyone who signs up for it, and almost always contains advice on
getting all children vaccinated. The Vaccine Education Center10
at CHOP says it's funded by endowed chairs and "does not receive
support from pharmaceutical companies."
But it neglects to mention that the hospital indirectly
benefits from drug company money that helps fund endowed chairs
like Merck's Maurice R. Hilleman Professor of Vaccinology, which
is currently held by Paul Offit11,
who not only is very public about his belief that infants could
theoretically safely handle 10,000 vaccines all at once; he also
openly opposes personal belief vaccine exemptions.12
Rarely is it mentioned that Offit has a financial stake in the
vaccine industry, as he invented one of the vaccines CHOP
promotes. He's also served on the scientific advisory board of
Merck.
Offit's personal beliefs about forcing people to
involuntarily use vaccines, which violates the informed consent
ethic in medicine, along with the inaccurate statements he makes
about vaccine safety, which are not backed by solid scientific
evidence, are echoed throughout CHOP's pro-forced vaccination
propaganda. For example, one of their Q&A brochures13
answers the question: Can too many vaccines overwhelm an
infant's immune system? with the following statement:
"No. Compared to the immunological challenges that
infants handle every day, the challenge from the
immunological components in vaccines is minuscule. Babies
begin dealing with immunological challenges at birth. The
mother's womb is a sterile environment, free from viruses,
bacteria, parasites and fungi. But after babies pass through
the birth canal and enter the world, they are immediately
colonized with trillions of bacteria, which means that they
carry the bacteria on their bodies but aren't infected by
them. These bacteria live on the skin, nose, throat and
intestines. To make sure that colonizing bacteria don't
invade the bloodstream and cause harm, babies constantly
make antibodies against them.
...Given that infants are colonized with trillions of
bacteria, that each bacterium contains between 2,000 and
6,000 immunological components and that infants are infected
with numerous viruses, the challenge from the 150
immunological components in vaccines is minuscule compared
to what infants manage every day."
This is an astounding comparison and shockingly ignorant of
foundational physiology.
Not only do these ignorant statements dismiss and disparage the
role of beneficial gut bacteria – which we now know are
absolutely essential and vital for human health and well-being –
and characterize normal gut bacteria as potentially harmful, but
there is a false characterization of the immunological challenge
posed by multiple vaccines, each of which can contain either
live or killed viruses and a number of different adjuvants and
chemicals, injected into the tiny body of an infant. CHOP even
takes Offit's ridiculous claim that infants can safely handle
10,000 vaccines at one time to brand new heights, stating that:14
"The purpose of vaccines is to prompt a child's body
to make antibodies, which work by preventing bacteria and
viruses from reproducing themselves and causing disease. So,
how many different antibodies can babies make?
The best answer to this question came from a Nobel
Prize-winning immunologist at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology named Susumu Tonegawa, who first figured out how
people make antibodies. Tonegawa discovered that antibodies
are made by rearranging and recombining many different
genes, and found that people can make about 10 billion
different antibodies.
Given the number of antibody-producing cells in a
child's bloodstream, and the number of immunological
components contained in vaccines, it is reasonable to
conclude that babies could effectively make
antibodies to about 100,000 vaccines at one time."
[Emphasis mine]
The Difference Between Natural and Vaccine-Induced Immunity
Many still believe vaccines provide identical immunity to
that obtained when you are naturally exposed to an infection,
This widespread misconception needs to be corrected.
The presumed result of a vaccination is to help you build
immunity to potentially harmful organisms that cause disease.
What many fail to appreciate is that your body's immune system
is already designed to do this in response to
naturally-occurring infectious agents that you are constantly
exposed to throughout life. One major difference between
vaccine-induced immunity and natural immunity stems from how
you're exposed to these organisms.
Most organisms that cause infection enter your body through
the mucous membranes of your nose, mouth, lungs or your
digestive tract.
These mucous membranes have their own immune system, called
the secretory IgA immune system. It is a different system from
the one activated when a vaccine is injected into your body.
Your IgA immune system is your body's first line of defense and
its job is to address the infectious microorganism at their
entry points, thus reducing or even eliminating the need for
activation of your body's entire immune system.
However, when a laboratory altered or created infectious
microorganism is injected into your body with a vaccine and,
especially when combined with an immune adjuvant, such as
aluminum, your IgA immune system is bypassed, stimulating your
immune system to mount a very strong inflammatory response.
Vaccines can also trigger such a strong inflammatory response
that the inflammation becomes chronic and leads to chronic
illness or disability. (People with a personal or family history
of severe allergy or autoimmunity should be cautious about
vaccination because they already have a genetic predisposition
to inflammatory responses that do not resolve and can lead to
chronic health problems.)
Injecting these lab-altered microorganisms into your body in
an attempt to provoke an atypical, temporary immunity is clearly
not the same way your body develops naturally-acquired immunity.
Your immune system simply was not designed to be injected with
lab altered disease-causing organisms in this manner. While I am
a great fan and avocate of technology it is very clear to me
that this is one reason why vaccines almost always only provide
a much more temporary immunity compared to naturally acquired
immunity.
Since vaccines bypass your natural first-line defense (your
lgA immune system), they are clearly inferior to natural
immunity and fail to provide the same kind of long lasting
protection from future disease as they provide typically
inferior immunity compared to that your body would acquire
by experiencing and healing from the natural disease. In the
case of mumps, for instance,
immunity is typically permanent for those who contract the
disease during childhood.
What You Need to Know about "Herd Immunity"
The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
describes vaccine-induced herd immunity, also labeled "community
immunity" by public health doctors as follows:
"When a critical portion of a community is immunized
against a contagious disease, most members of the community
are protected against that disease because there is little
opportunity for an outbreak. Even those who are not eligible
for certain vaccines – such as infants, pregnant women, or
immunocompromised individuals – get some protection because
the spread of contagious disease is contained. This is known
as 'community immunity.'"
The problem is that there is in fact such a thing as
natural herd immunity. But what they've done is they've
taken this natural phenomenon and assumed that vaccines will
work the same way. However, vaccines do not confer the same kind
of immunity as experiencing the natural disease, and the science
clearly shows that there's a big difference between naturally
acquired herd immunity and vaccine-induced herd immunity.
To learn more, I urge you to listen to the following video,
in which Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the
National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), discusses the
concept of herd immunity.
"The original concept of herd immunity is that when a
population experiences the natural disease… natural immunity
would be achieved – a robust, qualitatively superior natural
herd immunity within the population, which would then
protect other people from getting the disease in other age
groups. It's the way infectious diseases work…
The vaccinologists have adopted this idea of vaccine
induced herd immunity. The problem with it is that all
vaccines only confer temporary protection… Pertussis vaccine
is one the best examples… Pertussis vaccines have been used
for about 50 to 60 years, and the organism has started to
evolve to become vaccine resistant. I think this is not
something that's really understood generally by the public:
Vaccines do not confer the same type of immunity
that natural exposure to the disease does."
Vaccine professionals would like you to believe they are the
same, but they're qualitatively two entirely different types of
immune responses.
"In most cases natural exposure to disease would give
you a longer lasting, more robust, qualitatively superior
immunity because it gives you both cell mediated immunity
and humoral immunity," Barbara explains. "Humoral
is the antibody production. The way you measure
vaccine-induced immunity is by how high the antibody titers
are. (How many antibodies you have, basically.)
But the problem is, the cell mediated immunity is
very important as well. Most vaccines evade cell mediated
immunity and go straight for the antibodies, which is only
one part of immunity. That's been the big problem with the
production of vaccines."
Vaccines are designed to trick your body's immune
system into producing protective antibodies needed to resist any
future infection. However, your body is smarter than that. The
artificial stimulation of your immune system produced by lab
altered bacteria and viruses simply does not replicate the exact
response that your immune system mounts when naturally
encountering the infectious microorganism.
According to Barbara:
"The fact that manmade vaccines cannot replicate the
body's natural experience with the disease is one of the key
points of contention between those who insist that mankind
cannot live without mass use of multiple vaccines and those
who believe that mankind's biological integrity will be
severely compromised by their continued use.
...[I]s it better to protect children against
infectious disease early in life through temporary immunity
from a vaccine, or are they better off contracting certain
contagious infections in childhood and attaining permanent
immunity? Do vaccine complications ultimately cause more
chronic illness and death than infectious diseases do? These
questions essentially pit trust in human intervention
against trust in nature and the natural order, which existed
long before vaccines were created by man."
Why We Must Defend Vaccine Exemptions
The religious exemption to vaccination is now under heavy
attack across the country. In the video below, Barbara Loe
Fisher, co-founder of the National Vaccine Information Center
(NVIC), discusses this important exemption, and why it's so
vital we defend our right to opt out of vaccinations for
medical, religious, or conscientious belief reasons.
All Americans need to know their options for legally
opting-out of vaccinations, and you also need to know why
it's so important to protect this legal option, whether you
choose to use every federally recommended vaccine for yourself
and your children or not.
No matter what vaccination choices you make for yourself or
your family, there is a basic human right to be fully informed
about all risks and have the ability to refuse to allow
substances you consider to be harmful, toxic or poisonous to be
forced upon you.
Unfortunately, the partnership between government health
agencies and vaccine manufacturers is getting closer and closer.
There is some seroius discrimination against Americans, who want
to be free to exercise their human right to informed consent to
medical risk-taking when it comes to making voluntary decisions
about which vaccines they and their children use. We cannot
allow that happen!
It's vitally important to know your legal rights and
understand your options when it comes to using vaccines and
prescription drugs.
For example, your doctor is legally obligated to provide you
with the CDC Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) sheet and
discuss the potential symptoms of side effects of the
vaccination(s) you or your child receive BEFORE vaccination
takes place. If someone giving a vaccine does not do this, it is
a a violation of federal law. Furthermore, the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 also requires doctors and
other vaccine providers to:
Keep a permanent record of all vaccines given and the
manufacturer's name and lot number
Write down serious health problems, hospitalizations,
injuries and deaths that occur after vaccination in the
patient's permanent medical record
File an official report of all serious health problems,
hospitalizations, injuries and deaths following vaccination
to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System
(VAERS)
If a vaccine provider fails to inform, record or report, it
is a violation of federal law. It's important to get all the
facts before making your decision about vaccination; and to
understand that you have the legal right to opt out of
using a vaccine that you do not want you or your child to
receive. At present, all 50 states allow a medical exemption to
vaccination (medical exemptions must be approved by an M.D. or
D.O.); 48 states allow a religious exemption to vaccination; and
18 states allow a personal, philosophical or conscientious
belief exemption to vaccination. But as mentioned earlier,
vaccine exemptions are under attack in a number of states, and
it's in everyone's best interest to protect the right to make
informed, voluntary vaccination decisions.
What You Can Do to Make a Difference
While it seems "old-fashioned," the only truly effective
actions you can take to protect the right to informed consent to
vaccination and expand your rights under the law to make
voluntary vaccine choices, is to get personally involved with
your state legislators and the leaders in your community.
THINK GLOBALLY, ACT LOCALLY.
Mass vaccination policies are made at the federal level but
vaccine laws are made at the state level, and it is at the state
level where your action to protect your vaccine choice rights
will have the greatest impact.
Signing up to be a user of NVIC's free online Advocacy Portal
at
www.NVICAdvocacy.org gives you access to practical, useful
information to help you become an effective vaccine choice
advocate in your own community. You will get real-time Action
Alerts about what you can do if there are threats to vaccine
exemptions in your state. With the click of a mouse or one touch
on a Smartphone screen you will be put in touch with YOUR
elected representatives so you can let them know how you feel
and what you want them to do. Plus, when national vaccine issues
come up, you will have all the information you need to make sure
your voice is heard.
It is so important for you to reach out and make sure your
concerns get on the radar screen of the leaders and opinion
makers in your community, especially the politicians you elect
and are directly involved in making vaccine laws in your state.
These are your elected representatives, so you have a right and
a responsibility to let them know what's really
happening in your life and the lives of people you know when it
comes to vaccine mandates. Be sure to share the "real life"
experiences that you or people you know have had with
vaccination.
Internet Resources
I also encourage you to visit the following web pages on the
National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) website at
www.NVIC.org:
NVIC Memorial for Vaccine Victims: View
descriptions and photos of children and adults, who have
suffered vaccine reactions, injuries and deaths. If you or
your child experiences an adverse vaccine event, please
consider posting and sharing your story here.
Vaccine Freedom Wall: View or post descriptions
of harassment by doctors or state officials for making
independent vaccine choices.
Find a Doctor Who will Listen to Your Concerns
If your pediatrician or doctor refuses to provide medical
care to you or your child unless you agree to get vaccines you
don't want, I strongly encourage you to have the courage to
find another doctor. Harassment, intimidation, and refusal
of medical care is becoming the modus operandi of the medical
establishment in an effort to punish those patients and parents,
who become truly educated about health and vaccination and want
to make vaccine choices instead of being forced to follow risky
one-size-fits-all vaccine policies.
If you are treated with disrespect or are harassed in any way
by a doctor (or government official), do not engage in an
unproductive argument. You may want to contact an attorney, your
elected state representatives or local media if you or your
child are threatened.
However, there is hope.
At least 15 percent of young doctors recently polled admit
that they're starting to adopt a more individualized approach to
vaccinations in direct response to the vaccine safety concerns
of parents. It is good news that there is a growing number of
smart young doctors, who prefer to work as partners with parents
in making personalized vaccine decisions for children, including
delaying vaccinations or giving children fewer vaccines on the
same day or continuing to provide medical care for those
families, who decline use of one or more vaccines.
So take the time to locate and connect with a doctor, who
treats you with compassion and respect and is willing to work
with you to do what is right for your child.
This content may be copied in full, with
copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific
permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other
use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.