Dr. Oz Investigates the Hazards of Dental Amalgams
April 16, 2013
Story at-a-glance
Dental amalgam is composed of about 50 percent mercury, a
well-known neurotoxin that can also damage your kidneys
There is overwhelming evidence showing mercury is easily
released in the form of vapor each time you eat, drink, brush
your teeth or otherwise stimulate your teeth. These mercury
vapors readily pass through your cell membranes, across your
blood-brain barrier, and into your central nervous system, where
it can cause psychological, neurological, and immunological
problems
Mercury used in dentistry is a significant source of
environmental mercury pollution. When you factor in
environmental costs and clean-up costs, amalgam is the most
expensive dental restoration material in the world
Once released into the environment, dental mercury converts to
methylmercury and contaminates fish, which are the largest
dietary source of mercury in the US
By Dr. Mercola
Dental amalgam is a primitive, environmentally polluting
product. It is an antiquated remnant from the Civil War
era—which is composed of about 50 percent mercury, a well-known
neurotoxin.
Aside from the health risks associated with placing mercury
into your teeth, there’s also the issue of environmental
pollution caused by the dental industry. Once released into the
environment, dental mercury converts to methylmercury and
contaminates fish, which are the largest dietary source of
mercury in the US.
Yet despite the evidence, the American Dental Association
(ADA) still remains a staunch advocate of dental amalgams,
refusing to acknowledge any inherent problems and risks
associated with dental mercury.
The ADA was also among the pro-mercury forces seeking to have
dental amalgams exempted from the United Nations Environment
Program’s (UNEP) worldwide environmental treaty on mercury.1
Fortunately, earlier this year the scheme failed. On January
19, 2013, more than 140 nations agreed to the treaty, giving
birth to “The Minamata Convention on Mercury,”2
which includes worldwide phase-down of dental amalgam to reduce
environmental mercury pollution. However, mercury-containing
vaccine preservatives were excluded from the treaty.
Thankfully an increasing number of dentists and health
professionals have started to take notice and are turning their
backs on this archaic practice. According to a survey, 52
percent of American dentists report they are no longer placing
amalgams in their patients’ mouths.
Specialists, however, are still far more likely to be using
mercury fillings — four out of five still place amalgams.
Last year, the
New York University College of Dentistry announced that
amalgam will no longer be the default restoration material
students are taught to use.
Dr. Oz Causes 'Controversy' with Amalgam Segment
Dr. Oz recently aired a segment about the dangers of dental
amalgams,3
which was quickly denounced and attacked by the ADA and
“skeptics” alike. In an ADA rebuttal published by the
Sacramento Bee, ADA President Dr. Robert Faiella states:4
"As a physician, Dr. Oz missed an opportunity to
educate his viewers, and instead focused on conjecture
rather than fact.”
And Steven Salzberg, a computer scientist at Johns Hopkins
University5
wrote a scathing critique in Forbes,6
in which he accuses Dr. Oz of demonstrating “poor understanding
of science,” and being “ignorant of the truth.”
“Why aren’t people dropping like flies from the
fillings in their teeth?” he writes. “With little
effort, I determined that, contrary to Dr. Oz’s statements,
nothing new has been discovered lately about silver tooth
fillings. I found studies going back to the 1970s that
showed what we’ve long known for decades - that
mercury is released from these fillings. But Oz
ignores all these.” [Emphasis mine]
What’s fascinating about Salzberg’s attempt at discrediting Dr.
Oz for bringing attention to this issue is that he doesn’t
actually refute the science at all. As he states above, studies
going back to the 70’s show that mercury vapor IS released from
amalgam fillings. He simply bashes Dr. Oz’s “overenthusiastic”
mannerisms and delivery of the facts.
In this case, he criticizes Dr. Oz for saying that he’s
showing the proof of mercury vapor release “for the first time,”
which would be technically inaccurate if viewed over the course
of history of modern science perhaps, yet accurate if you limit
it to Dr. Oz’s show, or perhaps even television. After all, when
was the last time you heard or saw anyone demonstrating how
mercury vapors are released from dental amalgams on TV?
Salzburg also disagrees with any claims that this mercury
vapor may in fact be harmful to your health, although he offers
no proof of its harmlessness, aside from the insinuation that
since people aren’t dropping dead, how bad could it be?
If you’re wondering the same thing, remember there’s a big
difference between acutely lethal toxicity and insidious,
disease-producing toxicity that accumulates over time. Just
because it doesn’t instantly kill you, does NOT mean it’s
harmless!
To perpetuate such an idea is reprehensibly irresponsible,
yet this is what’s happening not just with mercury fillings, but
also with water fluoridation, pollution, plastic
endocrine-disrupting chemicals and other environmental
pollutants that collectively take their toll on your health.
“Science-based skeptics” keep hammering out the message that
avoiding toxic exposures is “controversial,” as if your health
and well-being depended on ignoring such advice. When are we
going to stop giving them the time of day? How could such a
notion possibly BE controversial when you consider that the
human body was not designed to run on toxins and man-made
chemicals?
Smoking Teeth—Toxic Gas
Salzberg also questions the credentials of David Wentz who
performed the mercury vapor demonstration on Dr. Oz’ show. But a
similar visual demonstration of this toxic gas release
originates from the International Academy of Oral Medicine and
Toxicology7
(IAOMT).
The video powerfully demonstrates that if you have amalgam
fillings, then every time you eat, chew, visit the dentist or
drink hot coffee, mercury vapors are released into your oral
cavity, where it can be absorbed into your blood stream. The
poisonous vapors are odorless, colorless and tasteless however,
so you won't be able to tell that they're there. A single dental
amalgam filling may release as much as 15 micrograms of mercury
per day. The average individual has eight amalgam fillings and
could absorb up to 120 micrograms of mercury per day. In
contrast, eating mercury-tainted seafood will expose you to
about 2.3 micrograms per day -- and that alone was enough for
scientists to call for a worldwide warning8
back in 2006.
The Truth about Mercury Fillings: Disasters for Your Health and
the Environment
The mercury used by dentists to manufacture dental amalgam is
shipped as a hazardous material to the dental office. Any
amalgam leftover is also treated as hazardous and requires
special precautions to dispose of, yet it’s supposed to be
“safe” to keep it in your mouth for years to come.
Mercury is a potent neurotoxin that can damage your brain,
central nervous system and kidneys. Children and fetuses, whose
brains are still developing, are most at risk, but really anyone
can be affected. Sadly, many live with toxic reactions for
extended periods of time, never connecting the dots between
their failing health and the mercury in their teeth.
Once someone dies, their amalgam fillings actually pose a
risk to the living as well. Emissions from the combustion of
mercury fillings during cremation are a significant contaminator
of air, waterways, soil, wildlife and food. Seven to nine metric
tons of mercury per year escapes into the atmosphere during
cremations, and it is estimated that, left unchecked, crematoria
will be the largest single cause of mercury pollution by 2020.
When you factor in environmental costs and clean-up costs,
amalgam is actually the MOST EXPENSIVE dental material in the
world. It is also the number one cause of mercury exposure for
consumers, according to the Canadian government and other
sources.
Important Information Regarding Amalgam Removal
For those of you who have mercury fillings, I recommend that
you have them removed … but avoid making the mistake I did
nearly 20 years ago by having it done by a non-biological
dentist. When you have these fillings removed you can be exposed
to significant amounts of mercury vapors if the dentist doesn't
know what he or she is doing. It's also for this reason that I
strongly suggest you get healthy BEFORE having your fillings
removed, as you want your detoxification mechanisms optimized
prior to removal.
My struggles with my own teeth led me to learn about and
embrace biological dentistry, also known as holistic or
environmental dentistry. In a nutshell, biological dentistry
views your teeth and gums as an integrated part of your entire
body, and any medical treatments performed takes this fact into
account. The primary aim of holistic dentistry is to resolve
your dental problems while working in harmony with the rest of
your body.
Biological dentists are well aware of the dangers involved
with toxic materials such as mercury fillings (aka amalgams).
Some things that need to be done to keep you (and your dentist)
safe during amalgam removal include:
Providing you with an alternative air source and
instructing you not to breathe through your mouth
Using a cold-water spray to minimize mercury vapors
Putting a rubber dam in your mouth so you don't swallow
or inhale any toxins
Using a high-volume evacuator near the tooth at all
times to evacuate the mercury vapor
Washing your mouth out immediately after the fillings
have been removed (the dentist should also change gloves
after the removal)
Immediately cleaning your protective wear and face once
the fillings are removed
Using room air purifiers
How to Find a Qualified Biological Dentist
Knowledgeable biological dentists can be hard to come by, so
start your search by asking a friend, relative, neighbor, or
inquire at your local health food store. The following links can
also help you to find a mercury-free, biological dentist:
One of the most popular alternatives to amalgam is resin
composite, which is made of a type of plastic reinforced with
powdered glass. It is already common throughout the United
States and the rest of the developed world, offering notable
improvements over amalgam, as it:
Is environmentally safe: Composite, which contains no
mercury, does not pollute the environment. This saves
taxpayers from paying the costs of cleaning up dental
mercury pollution in our water, air, and land – and the
costs of health problems associated with mercury pollution.
Preserves healthy tooth structure, because, unlike
amalgam, it does not require the removal of significant
amounts of healthy tooth matter. Over the long term,
composite preserves healthy tooth structure and actually
strengthens teeth, leading to better oral health and less
extensive dental work over the long-term.
Is long-lasting: While some claim that amalgam fillings
last longer than composite fillings, the science reveals
this claim to be baseless. The latest studies show that
composite not only lasts as long as amalgam, but actually
has a higher overall survival rate.
A lesser-known alternative is increasingly making
mercury-free dentistry possible even in the rural areas of
developing countries. Atraumatic restorative treatment (also
called alternative restorative treatment or ART) is a
mercury-free restorative technique that has been demonstrated a
success in a diverse array of countries around the world,
including Tanzania, India, Brazil, Zimbabwe, Turkey, South
Africa, Thailand, Canada, Panama, Ecuador, Syria, Hong Kong,
Mexico, Sri Lanka, Chile, Nigeria, China, Uruguay, Peru, and the
United States. ART relies on adhesive materials for the filling
(instead of mercury) and uses only hand instruments to place the
filling, making it particularly well-suited for rural areas of
developing countries.
Global Consensus Reached on Mercury Pollution
There’s now a global consensus that so-called “silver”
fillings contribute to environmental mercury pollution, and the
UN treaty calling for worldwide phase-down of amalgam to protect
the environment is a good start, seeing how significant of a
problem it is. According to EPA estimates from 2010, about 50
percent of the mercury entering municipal wastewater treatment
plants (about 3.7 tons each year) can be traced back to
dental amalgam waste. An estimated 90 percent is captured by the
treatment plants.9
The rest ends up in sewage sludge—some of which ends up in
landfills, while other portions are incinerated (thereby
polluting the air) or applied as agricultural fertilizer
(polluting your food), or seep into waterways (polluting fish
and wildlife).
But we also need to recognize the hazard mercury amalgam
poses to human health when used in dentistry. Small steps are
being taken, but much more still needs to be done. As reported
by the Chicago Tribune10:
“Two large, nonprofit Catholic hospital chains are
waging proxy battles with the two leading American makers of
dental amalgam. The hospital chains' investment arms are
seeking a shareholder vote that would mandate each company
detail plans to phase out mercury.”
It's high time that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
and the dental schools in charge of educating young dentists
start acknowledging the dangers of mercury fillings and at least
protect those most vulnerable to damage from mercury fillings --
children and pregnant women. There is overwhelming evidence
showing mercury is easily released in the form of vapor each
time you eat, drink, brush your teeth or otherwise stimulate
your teeth. These mercury vapors readily pass through your cell
membranes, across your blood-brain barrier, and into your
central nervous system, where they can cause psychological,
neurological, and immunological problems.
Click on the code area and press
CTRL + C (for Windows) / CMD + C (for Macintosh) to copy the
code.
Please Help Hold FDA Accountable
On September 22, 2011, Dr.
Jeff Shuren, Director of the Center for Devices &
Radiological Health (the branch of the FDA responsible for the
approval and safety of all medical devices) promised to make an
announcement on amalgam by the end of 2011. When questioned by a
reporter at a major newspaper, the FDA repeated that it would
act in 2011. As 2011 came to a close, the suspense grew as
everyone speculated whether FDA would finally act, to protect
the health of American children. With just six minutes left in
the work year, at 4:54 pm on Friday, December 30, FDA conceded
that no announcement was forthcoming – not in 2011, and maybe
not at all.
As of today, April 16, 2013, the FDA’s announcement is
472 days overdue, and counting...
The FDA’s door is always open to the drug companies seeking
quick approval of its latest and greatest drug, but the agency
is now in its second year of violating its own deadline to act
on amalgam. In a call to action, The Campaign for Mercury Free
Dentistry writes11:
“As confirmed by the mercury treaty talks, dental
amalgam is beyond a doubt a hazard in our environment; that
is why so many government officials on every continent are
dedicated to phasing down – and ultimately phasing out – its
use. But FDA failed to consider the environmental health
threat posed by this mercury product in its 2009 dental
amalgam rule.
Not only that, but FDA failed to address the problem
of amalgam use in children – even though its own hand-picked
advisory panel on dental amalgam raised this concern again
and again during its 2010 meeting. The scientists on that
panel told FDA there is “no place for mercury in children”….
recommended that in “children less than 6 years of age, I
would restrict it significantly”…. insisted that amalgam did
not belong in “pregnant women and definitely not in those
below 6 years of age”…. and asked FDA, “why put amalgams in
children if we know they're going to live with that for the
rest of their lives? And we don't know what that's going to
do.”
In fact, not a single scientist on FDA’s advisory
panel agreed with FDA's 2009 rule that promoted unrestricted
amalgam use in children and pregnant women. Director Shuren
himself has acknowledged the FDA panel’s conclusion: "Now,
the panel did …point out that there may be certain
populations who are more sensitive to dental amalgam, like
young children and pregnant women."
So why doesn’t FDA protect those young
children and pregnant women from this unnecessary source of
mercury exposure?”
How You Can Help
Dr. Oz spoke out about mercury fillings—now it’s your turn!
It's high time for the FDA start acting on the science and get
on the bandwagon to protect the health of children and pregnant
women across the US. Your voice is needed in order to bring
about permanent change in the fight for mercury-free dentistry.
The FDA reneged on their stated intent to address dental amalgam
by the end of 2011. We now need you to urge the FDA to heed the
advice of its own scientists, convened in December 2010. To
voice your opinion, please contact Dr. Shuren. This time, we
think it best if you telephone or fax him, and make your message
more direct, rather than emailing.
MAIL a letter to Director Jeff Shuren,
CDRH, Building WO66, Room 5442, U.S. Food and Drug Admin.,
10903 New Hampshire Ave. Silver Spring, MD 20993
Phone calls and faxes are especially important because Dr.
Shuren cannot ignore them – keep calling and leaving messages
until you get answers! Ask Dr. Shuren:
The FDA panel on dental amalgam that met in 2010
recommended against using dental amalgam in young children
and pregnant women. What are you doing to protect young
children and pregnant women from dental amalgam?
Other nations like Canada, Australia, the United
Kingdom, Sweden, and Denmark have taken steps to protect
children and pregnant women from dental amalgam. Why is the
U.S. so far behind other nations?
You said FDA would make an announcement on dental
amalgam by December 31, 2011. We have waited patiently for
more than 450 days, but it is now 2013. When is FDA going to
start protecting our children from dental mercury?
472 days of FDA silence is enough. With your
help, we can show our government that the public will not rest
until FDA is at least protecting our children from dental
mercury.